Humanity in AI: Detecting the Personality of Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.08545v1
• Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 05:53:11 GMT
• Title: Humanity in AI: Detecting the Personality of Large Language Models
• Authors: Baohua Zhan, Yongyi Huang, Wenyao Cui, Huaping Zhang, Jianyun Shang,
• Abstract summary: Questionnaires are a common method for detecting the personality of Large Language Models (LLMs) We propose combining text mining with questionnaires method. We find that the personalities of LLMs are derived from their pre-trained data.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
• Abstract: Questionnaires are a common method for detecting the personality of Large Language Models (LLMs). However, their reliability is often compromised by two main issues: hallucinations (where LLMs produce inaccurate or irrelevant responses) and the sensitivity of responses to the order of the presented options. To address these issues, we propose combining text mining with questionnaires method. Text mining can extract psychological features from the LLMs' responses without being affected by the order of options. Furthermore, because this method does not rely on specific answers, it reduces the influence of hallucinations. By normalizing the scores from both methods and calculating the root mean square error, our experiment results confirm the effectiveness of this approach. To further investigate the origins of personality traits in LLMs, we conduct experiments on both pre-trained language models (PLMs), such as BERT and GPT, as well as conversational models (ChatLLMs), such as ChatGPT. The results show that LLMs do contain certain personalities, for example, ChatGPT and ChatGLM exhibit the personality traits of 'Conscientiousness'. Additionally, we find that the personalities of LLMs are derived from their pre-trained data. The instruction data used to train ChatLLMs can enhance the generation of data containing personalities and expose their hidden personality. We compare the results with the human average personality score, and we find that the personality of FLAN-T5 in PLMs and ChatGPT in ChatLLMs is more similar to that of a human, with score differences of 0.34 and 0.22, respectively.

Related papers

• Neuron-based Personality Trait Induction in Large Language Models [115.08894603023712]
  Large language models (LLMs) have become increasingly proficient at simulating various personality traits. We present a neuron-based approach for personality trait induction in LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T07:47:45Z)
• Do LLMs Have Distinct and Consistent Personality? TRAIT: Personality Testset designed for LLMs with Psychometrics [29.325576963215163]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have led to their adaptation in various domains as conversational agents. We introduce TRAIT, a new benchmark consisting of 8K multi-choice questions designed to assess the personality of LLMs. LLMs exhibit distinct and consistent personality, which is highly influenced by their training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T19:50:56Z)
• LLMvsSmall Model? Large Language Model Based Text Augmentation Enhanced Personality Detection Model [58.887561071010985]
  Personality detection aims to detect one's personality traits underlying in social media posts. Most existing methods learn post features directly by fine-tuning the pre-trained language models. We propose a large language model (LLM) based text augmentation enhanced personality detection model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-12T12:10:18Z)
• Eliciting Personality Traits in Large Language Models [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly being utilized by both candidates and employers in the recruitment context. This study seeks to obtain a better understanding of such models by examining their output variations based on different input prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-13T10:09:00Z)
• Challenging the Validity of Personality Tests for Large Language Models [2.9123921488295768]
  Large language models (LLMs) behave increasingly human-like in text-based interactions. LLMs' responses to personality tests systematically deviate from human responses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-09T11:54:01Z)
• Do LLMs exhibit human-like response biases? A case study in survey design [66.1850490474361]
  We investigate the extent to which large language models (LLMs) reflect human response biases, if at all. We design a dataset and framework to evaluate whether LLMs exhibit human-like response biases in survey questionnaires. Our comprehensive evaluation of nine models shows that popular open and commercial LLMs generally fail to reflect human-like behavior.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-07T15:40:43Z)
• PsyCoT: Psychological Questionnaire as Powerful Chain-of-Thought for Personality Detection [50.66968526809069]
  We propose a novel personality detection method, called PsyCoT, which mimics the way individuals complete psychological questionnaires in a multi-turn dialogue manner. Our experiments demonstrate that PsyCoT significantly improves the performance and robustness of GPT-3.5 in personality detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-31T08:23:33Z)
• Character-LLM: A Trainable Agent for Role-Playing [67.35139167985008]
  Large language models (LLMs) can be used to serve as agents to simulate human behaviors. We introduce Character-LLM that teach LLMs to act as specific people such as Beethoven, Queen Cleopatra, Julius Caesar, etc.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-16T07:58:56Z)
• Can ChatGPT Assess Human Personalities? A General Evaluation Framework [70.90142717649785]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have produced impressive results in various areas, but their potential human-like psychology is still largely unexplored. This paper presents a generic evaluation framework for LLMs to assess human personalities based on Myers Briggs Type Indicator (MBTI) tests.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-01T06:16:14Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.