The Design Space of in-IDE Human-AI Experience
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.08676v1
- Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 10:02:52 GMT
- Title: The Design Space of in-IDE Human-AI Experience
- Authors: Agnia Sergeyuk, Ekaterina Koshchenko, Ilya Zakharov, Timofey Bryksin, Maliheh Izadi,
- Abstract summary: Key findings stress the need for AI systems that are more personalized, proactive, and reliable.
Our findings show that while Adopters appreciate advanced features and non-interruptive integration, Churners emphasize the need for improved reliability and privacy.
Non-Users, in contrast, focus on skill development and ethical concerns as barriers to adoption.
- Score: 6.05260196829912
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Nowadays, integration of AI-driven tools within Integrated Development Environments (IDEs) is reshaping the software development lifecycle. Existing research highlights that users expect these tools to be efficient, context-aware, accurate, user-friendly, customizable, and secure. However, a major gap remains in understanding developers' needs and challenges, particularly when interacting with AI systems in IDEs and from the perspectives of different user groups. In this work, we address this gap through structured interviews with 35 developers from three different groups: Adopters, Churners, and Non-Users of AI in IDEs to create a comprehensive Design Space of in-IDE Human-AI Experience. Our results highlight key areas of Technology Improvement, Interaction, and Alignment in in-IDE AI systems, as well as Simplifying Skill Building and Programming Tasks. Our key findings stress the need for AI systems that are more personalized, proactive, and reliable. We also emphasize the importance of context-aware and privacy-focused solutions and better integration with existing workflows. Furthermore, our findings show that while Adopters appreciate advanced features and non-interruptive integration, Churners emphasize the need for improved reliability and privacy. Non-Users, in contrast, focus on skill development and ethical concerns as barriers to adoption. Lastly, we provide recommendations for industry practitioners aiming to enhance AI integration within developer workflows.
Related papers
- $\textit{"I Don't Use AI for Everything"}$: Exploring Utility, Attitude, and Responsibility of AI-empowered Tools in Software Development [19.851794567529286]
This study investigates the adoption, impact, and security considerations of AI-empowered tools in the software development process.
Our findings reveal widespread adoption of AI tools across various stages of software development.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-20T09:17:10Z) - Constraining Participation: Affordances of Feedback Features in Interfaces to Large Language Models [49.74265453289855]
Large language models (LLMs) are now accessible to anyone with a computer, a web browser, and an internet connection via browser-based interfaces.
This paper examines the affordances of interactive feedback features in ChatGPT's interface, analysing how they shape user input and participation in iteration.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-27T13:50:37Z) - OpenHands: An Open Platform for AI Software Developers as Generalist Agents [109.8507367518992]
We introduce OpenHands, a platform for the development of AI agents that interact with the world in similar ways to a human developer.
We describe how the platform allows for the implementation of new agents, safe interaction with sandboxed environments for code execution, and incorporation of evaluation benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-23T17:50:43Z) - The Ethics of Advanced AI Assistants [53.89899371095332]
This paper focuses on the opportunities and the ethical and societal risks posed by advanced AI assistants.
We define advanced AI assistants as artificial agents with natural language interfaces, whose function is to plan and execute sequences of actions on behalf of a user.
We consider the deployment of advanced assistants at a societal scale, focusing on cooperation, equity and access, misinformation, economic impact, the environment and how best to evaluate advanced AI assistants.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-24T23:18:46Z) - Bridging Gaps, Building Futures: Advancing Software Developer Diversity and Inclusion Through Future-Oriented Research [50.545824691484796]
We present insights from SE researchers and practitioners on challenges and solutions regarding diversity and inclusion in SE.
We share potential utopian and dystopian visions of the future and provide future research directions and implications for academia and industry.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-10T16:18:11Z) - Open-Source AI-based SE Tools: Opportunities and Challenges of Collaborative Software Learning [23.395624804517034]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have become instrumental in advancing software engineering (SE) tasks.
The collaboration of these AI-based SE models hinges on maximising the sources of high-quality data.
Data especially of high quality, often holds commercial or sensitive value, making it less accessible for open-source AI-based SE projects.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-09T10:47:02Z) - In-IDE Human-AI Experience in the Era of Large Language Models; A
Literature Review [2.6703221234079946]
The study of in-IDE Human-AI Experience is critical in understanding how these AI tools are transforming the software development process.
We conducted a literature review to study the current state of in-IDE Human-AI Experience research.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-19T14:55:51Z) - Exploring the intersection of Generative AI and Software Development [0.0]
The synergy between generative AI and Software Engineering emerges as a transformative frontier.
This whitepaper delves into the unexplored realm, elucidating how generative AI techniques can revolutionize software development.
It serves as a guide for stakeholders, urging discussions and experiments in the application of generative AI in Software Engineering.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-21T19:23:23Z) - Federated Learning-Empowered AI-Generated Content in Wireless Networks [58.48381827268331]
Federated learning (FL) can be leveraged to improve learning efficiency and achieve privacy protection for AIGC.
We present FL-based techniques for empowering AIGC, and aim to enable users to generate diverse, personalized, and high-quality content.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-14T04:13:11Z) - Artificial Intelligence for IT Operations (AIOPS) Workshop White Paper [50.25428141435537]
Artificial Intelligence for IT Operations (AIOps) is an emerging interdisciplinary field arising in the intersection between machine learning, big data, streaming analytics, and the management of IT operations.
Main aim of the AIOPS workshop is to bring together researchers from both academia and industry to present their experiences, results, and work in progress in this field.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-01-15T10:43:10Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.