Natural Language Counterfactual Explanations for Graphs Using Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.09295v1
• Date: Fri, 11 Oct 2024 23:06:07 GMT
• Title: Natural Language Counterfactual Explanations for Graphs Using Large Language Models
• Authors: Flavio Giorgi, Cesare Campagnano, Fabrizio Silvestri, Gabriele Tolomei,
• Abstract summary: We exploit the power of open-source Large Language Models to generate natural language explanations. We show that our approach effectively produces accurate natural language representations of counterfactual instances.
• Score: 7.560731917128082
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) has emerged as a critical area of research to unravel the opaque inner logic of (deep) machine learning models. Among the various XAI techniques proposed in the literature, counterfactual explanations stand out as one of the most promising approaches. However, these ``what-if'' explanations are frequently complex and technical, making them difficult for non-experts to understand and, more broadly, challenging for humans to interpret. To bridge this gap, in this work, we exploit the power of open-source Large Language Models to generate natural language explanations when prompted with valid counterfactual instances produced by state-of-the-art explainers for graph-based models. Experiments across several graph datasets and counterfactual explainers show that our approach effectively produces accurate natural language representations of counterfactual instances, as demonstrated by key performance metrics.

Related papers

• Explaining Text Similarity in Transformer Models [52.571158418102584]
  Recent advances in explainable AI have made it possible to mitigate limitations by leveraging improved explanations for Transformers. We use BiLRP, an extension developed for computing second-order explanations in bilinear similarity models, to investigate which feature interactions drive similarity in NLP models. Our findings contribute to a deeper understanding of different semantic similarity tasks and models, highlighting how novel explainable AI methods enable in-depth analyses and corpus-level insights.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T17:11:31Z)
• T-Explainer: A Model-Agnostic Explainability Framework Based on Gradients [5.946429628497358]
  We introduce T-Explainer, a novel local additive attribution explainer based on Taylor expansion. It has desirable properties, such as local accuracy and consistency, making T-Explainer stable over multiple runs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-25T10:40:49Z)
• Large Language Models for Scientific Synthesis, Inference and Explanation [56.41963802804953]
  We show how large language models can perform scientific synthesis, inference, and explanation. We show that the large language model can augment this "knowledge" by synthesizing from the scientific literature. This approach has the further advantage that the large language model can explain the machine learning system's predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-12T02:17:59Z)
• Explainability for Large Language Models: A Survey [59.67574757137078]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in natural language processing. This paper introduces a taxonomy of explainability techniques and provides a structured overview of methods for explaining Transformer-based language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-02T22:14:26Z)
• On Robustness of Prompt-based Semantic Parsing with Large Pre-trained Language Model: An Empirical Study on Codex [48.588772371355816]
  This paper presents the first empirical study on the adversarial robustness of a large prompt-based language model of code, codex. Our results demonstrate that the state-of-the-art (SOTA) code-language models are vulnerable to carefully crafted adversarial examples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-30T13:21:00Z)
• Visualizing and Explaining Language Models [0.0]
  Natural Language Processing has become, after Computer Vision, the second field of Artificial Intelligence. This paper showcases the techniques used in some of the most popular Deep Learning for NLP visualizations, with a special focus on interpretability and explainability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-30T17:23:33Z)
• Syntax-informed Question Answering with Heterogeneous Graph Transformer [2.139714421848487]
  We present a linguistics-informed question answering approach that extends and fine-tunes a pre-trained neural language model. We illustrate the approach by the addition of syntactic information in the form of dependency and constituency graphic structures connecting tokens and virtual tokens.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-01T07:48:03Z)
• Interpreting Language Models with Contrastive Explanations [99.7035899290924]
  Language models must consider various features to predict a token, such as its part of speech, number, tense, or semantics. Existing explanation methods conflate evidence for all these features into a single explanation, which is less interpretable for human understanding. We show that contrastive explanations are quantifiably better than non-contrastive explanations in verifying major grammatical phenomena.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-21T18:32:24Z)
• Towards Interpretable Natural Language Understanding with Explanations as Latent Variables [146.83882632854485]
  We develop a framework for interpretable natural language understanding that requires only a small set of human annotated explanations for training. Our framework treats natural language explanations as latent variables that model the underlying reasoning process of a neural model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-24T02:05:56Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.