SeRA: Self-Reviewing and Alignment of Large Language Models using Implicit Reward Margins
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.09362v1
- Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 04:17:28 GMT
- Title: SeRA: Self-Reviewing and Alignment of Large Language Models using Implicit Reward Margins
- Authors: Jongwoo Ko, Saket Dingliwal, Bhavana Ganesh, Sailik Sengupta, Sravan Bodapati, Aram Galstyan,
- Abstract summary: Self-Reviewing and Alignment (SeRA) is a cost-efficient and effective method that can be readily combined with existing DAAs.
SeRA comprises of two components: (1) sample selection using implicit reward margins, which helps alleviate over-fitting to some undesired features, and (2) preference bootstrapping using implicit rewards to augment preference data with updated policy models.
- Score: 30.767203592231496
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: Direct alignment algorithms (DAAs), such as direct preference optimization (DPO), have become popular alternatives for Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) due to their simplicity, efficiency, and stability. However, the preferences used in DAAs are usually collected before the alignment training begins and remain unchanged (off-policy). This can lead to two problems where the policy model (1) picks up on spurious correlations in the dataset (as opposed to learning the intended alignment expressed in the human preference labels), and (2) overfits to feedback on off-policy trajectories that have less likelihood of being generated by an updated policy model. To address these issues, we introduce Self-Reviewing and Alignment (SeRA), a cost-efficient and effective method that can be readily combined with existing DAAs. SeRA comprises of two components: (1) sample selection using implicit reward margins, which helps alleviate over-fitting to some undesired features, and (2) preference bootstrapping using implicit rewards to augment preference data with updated policy models in a cost-efficient manner. Extensive experimentation, including some on instruction-following tasks, demonstrate the effectiveness and generality of SeRA in training LLMs on offline preference datasets with DAAs.
Related papers
- Reward-Augmented Data Enhances Direct Preference Alignment of LLMs [56.24431208419858]
We introduce reward-conditioned Large Language Models (LLMs) that learn from the entire spectrum of response quality within the dataset.
We propose an effective yet simple data relabeling method that conditions the preference pairs on quality scores to construct a reward-augmented dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-10T16:01:51Z) - Self-supervised Preference Optimization: Enhance Your Language Model with Preference Degree Awareness [27.43137305486112]
We propose a novel Self-supervised Preference Optimization (SPO) framework, which constructs a self-supervised preference degree loss combined with the alignment loss.
The results demonstrate that SPO can be seamlessly integrated with existing preference optimization methods to achieve state-of-the-art performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-26T12:37:26Z) - Bridging and Modeling Correlations in Pairwise Data for Direct Preference Optimization [75.1240295759264]
We propose an effective framework for Bridging and Modeling Correlations in pairwise data, named BMC.
We increase the consistency and informativeness of the pairwise preference signals through targeted modifications.
We identify that DPO alone is insufficient to model these correlations and capture nuanced variations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-14T11:29:47Z) - Cost-Effective Proxy Reward Model Construction with On-Policy and Active Learning [70.22819290458581]
Reinforcement learning with human feedback (RLHF) is a widely adopted approach in current large language model pipelines.
Our approach introduces two key innovations: (1) on-policy query to avoid OOD and imbalance issues in seed data, and (2) active learning to select the most informative data for preference queries.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-02T10:09:19Z) - Joint Demonstration and Preference Learning Improves Policy Alignment with Human Feedback [58.049113055986375]
We develop a single stage approach named Alignment with Integrated Human Feedback (AIHF) to train reward models and the policy.
The proposed approach admits a suite of efficient algorithms, which can easily reduce to, and leverage, popular alignment algorithms.
We demonstrate the efficiency of the proposed solutions with extensive experiments involving alignment problems in LLMs and robotic control problems in MuJoCo.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-11T01:20:53Z) - Self-Augmented Preference Optimization: Off-Policy Paradigms for Language Model Alignment [104.18002641195442]
We introduce Self-Augmented Preference Optimization (SAPO), an effective and scalable training paradigm that does not require existing paired data.
Building on the self-play concept, which autonomously generates negative responses, we further incorporate an off-policy learning pipeline to enhance data exploration and exploitation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-31T14:21:04Z) - $i$REPO: $i$mplicit Reward Pairwise Difference based Empirical Preference Optimization [12.266207199002604]
Large Language Models (LLM) can sometimes produce outputs that deviate from human expectations.
We propose a novel framework named $i$REPO, which utilizes implicit Reward pairwise difference regression for Empirical Preference Optimization.
We show that $i$REPO effectively achieves self-alignment using soft-label, self-generated responses and the logit of empirical AI annotators.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-24T05:42:11Z) - Linear Alignment: A Closed-form Solution for Aligning Human Preferences without Tuning and Feedback [70.32795295142648]
Linear alignment is a novel algorithm that aligns language models with human preferences in one single inference step.
Experiments on both general and personalized preference datasets demonstrate that linear alignment significantly enhances the performance and efficiency of LLM alignment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-21T10:46:23Z) - Offline Reinforcement Learning with Adaptive Behavior Regularization [1.491109220586182]
offline reinforcement learning (RL) defines a sample-efficient learning paradigm, where a policy is learned from static and previously collected datasets.
We propose a novel approach, which we refer to as adaptive behavior regularization (ABR)
ABR enables the policy to adaptively adjust its optimization objective between cloning and improving over the policy used to generate the dataset.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-15T15:59:11Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.