Unlearn and Burn: Adversarial Machine Unlearning Requests Destroy Model Accuracy

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.09591v1
• Date: Sat, 12 Oct 2024 16:47:04 GMT
• Title: Unlearn and Burn: Adversarial Machine Unlearning Requests Destroy Model Accuracy
• Authors: Yangsibo Huang, Daogao Liu, Lynn Chua, Badih Ghazi, Pritish Kamath, Ravi Kumar, Pasin Manurangsi, Milad Nasr, Amer Sinha, Chiyuan Zhang,
• Abstract summary: We expose a critical yet underexplored vulnerability in the deployment of unlearning systems. We present a threat model where an attacker can degrade model accuracy by submitting adversarial unlearning requests for data not present in the training set. We evaluate various verification mechanisms to detect the legitimacy of unlearning requests and reveal the challenges in verification.
• Score: 65.80757820884476
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Machine unlearning algorithms, designed for selective removal of training data from models, have emerged as a promising approach to growing privacy concerns. In this work, we expose a critical yet underexplored vulnerability in the deployment of unlearning systems: the assumption that the data requested for removal is always part of the original training set. We present a threat model where an attacker can degrade model accuracy by submitting adversarial unlearning requests for data not present in the training set. We propose white-box and black-box attack algorithms and evaluate them through a case study on image classification tasks using the CIFAR-10 and ImageNet datasets, targeting a family of widely used unlearning methods. Our results show extremely poor test accuracy following the attack: 3.6% on CIFAR-10 and 0.4% on ImageNet for white-box attacks, and 8.5% on CIFAR-10 and 1.3% on ImageNet for black-box attacks. Additionally, we evaluate various verification mechanisms to detect the legitimacy of unlearning requests and reveal the challenges in verification, as most of the mechanisms fail to detect stealthy attacks without severely impairing their ability to process valid requests. These findings underscore the urgent need for research on more robust request verification methods and unlearning protocols, should the deployment of machine unlearning systems become more prevalent in the future.

Related papers

• Undermining Image and Text Classification Algorithms Using Adversarial Attacks [0.0]
  Our study addresses the gap by training various machine learning models and using GANs and SMOTE to generate additional data points aimed at attacking text classification models. Our experiments reveal a significant vulnerability in classification models. Specifically, we observe a 20 % decrease in accuracy for the top-performing text classification models post-attack, along with a 30 % decrease in facial recognition accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-03T18:44:28Z)
• Verification of Machine Unlearning is Fragile [48.71651033308842]
  We introduce two novel adversarial unlearning processes capable of circumventing both types of verification strategies. This study highlights the vulnerabilities and limitations in machine unlearning verification, paving the way for further research into the safety of machine unlearning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-01T21:37:10Z)
• Adversarial Robustification via Text-to-Image Diffusion Models [56.37291240867549]
  Adrial robustness has been conventionally believed as a challenging property to encode for neural networks. We develop a scalable and model-agnostic solution to achieve adversarial robustness without using any data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-26T10:49:14Z)
• Gone but Not Forgotten: Improved Benchmarks for Machine Unlearning [0.0]
  We describe and propose alternative evaluation methods for machine unlearning algorithms. We show the utility of our alternative evaluations via a series of experiments of state-of-the-art unlearning algorithms on different computer vision datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-29T15:53:23Z)
• Learn What You Want to Unlearn: Unlearning Inversion Attacks against Machine Unlearning [16.809644622465086]
  We conduct the first investigation to understand the extent to which machine unlearning can leak the confidential content of unlearned data. Under the Machine Learning as a Service setting, we propose unlearning inversion attacks that can reveal the feature and label information of an unlearned sample. The experimental results indicate that the proposed attack can reveal the sensitive information of the unlearned data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-04T06:37:46Z)
• Zero-shot Retrieval: Augmenting Pre-trained Models with Search Engines [83.65380507372483]
  Large pre-trained models can dramatically reduce the amount of task-specific data required to solve a problem, but they often fail to capture domain-specific nuances out of the box. This paper shows how to leverage recent advances in NLP and multi-modal learning to augment a pre-trained model with search engine retrieval.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-29T05:33:28Z)
• Query Efficient Cross-Dataset Transferable Black-Box Attack on Action Recognition [99.29804193431823]
  Black-box adversarial attacks present a realistic threat to action recognition systems. We propose a new attack on action recognition that addresses these shortcomings by generating perturbations. Our method achieves 8% and higher 12% deception rates compared to state-of-the-art query-based and transfer-based attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-23T17:47:49Z)
• Query Efficient Decision Based Sparse Attacks Against Black-Box Deep Learning Models [9.93052896330371]
  We develop an evolution-based algorithm-SparseEvo-for the problem and evaluate against both convolutional deep neural networks and vision transformers. SparseEvo requires significantly fewer model queries than the state-of-the-art sparse attack Pointwise for both untargeted and targeted attacks. Importantly, the query efficient SparseEvo, along with decision-based attacks, in general raise new questions regarding the safety of deployed systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-31T21:10:47Z)
• How Robust are Randomized Smoothing based Defenses to Data Poisoning? [66.80663779176979]
  We present a previously unrecognized threat to robust machine learning models that highlights the importance of training-data quality. We propose a novel bilevel optimization-based data poisoning attack that degrades the robustness guarantees of certifiably robust classifiers. Our attack is effective even when the victim trains the models from scratch using state-of-the-art robust training methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-02T15:30:21Z)
• Leveraging Siamese Networks for One-Shot Intrusion Detection Model [0.0]
  Supervised Machine Learning (ML) to enhance Intrusion Detection Systems has been the subject of significant research. retraining the models in-situ renders the network susceptible to attacks owing to the time-window required to acquire a sufficient volume of data. Here, a complementary approach referred to as 'One-Shot Learning', whereby a limited number of examples of a new attack-class is used to identify a new attack-class. A Siamese Network is trained to differentiate between classes based on pairs similarities, rather than features, allowing to identify new and previously unseen attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-27T11:40:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.