Double Jeopardy and Climate Impact in the Use of Large Language Models: Socio-economic Disparities and Reduced Utility for Non-English Speakers

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.10665v1
• Date: Mon, 14 Oct 2024 16:11:04 GMT
• Title: Double Jeopardy and Climate Impact in the Use of Large Language Models: Socio-economic Disparities and Reduced Utility for Non-English Speakers
• Abstract summary: We show that English speakers face higher costs when using OpenAI's GPT models via APIs because of how the system processes the input -- tokenization. Around 1.5 billion people, speaking languages primarily from lower-middle-income countries, could incur costs that are 4 to 6 times higher than those faced by English speakers. This underscores the need for fairer algorithm development to benefit all linguistic groups.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Artificial Intelligence (AI), particularly large language models (LLMs), holds the potential to bridge language and information gaps, which can benefit the economies of developing nations. However, our analysis of FLORES-200, FLORES+, Ethnologue, and World Development Indicators data reveals that these benefits largely favor English speakers. Speakers of languages in low-income and lower-middle-income countries face higher costs when using OpenAI's GPT models via APIs because of how the system processes the input -- tokenization. Around 1.5 billion people, speaking languages primarily from lower-middle-income countries, could incur costs that are 4 to 6 times higher than those faced by English speakers. Disparities in LLM performance are significant, and tokenization in models priced per token amplifies inequalities in access, cost, and utility. Moreover, using the quality of translation tasks as a proxy measure, we show that LLMs perform poorly in low-resource languages, presenting a ``double jeopardy" of higher costs and poor performance for these users. We also discuss the direct impact of fragmentation in tokenizing low-resource languages on climate. This underscores the need for fairer algorithm development to benefit all linguistic groups.

Related papers

• AI Diffusion in Low Resource Language Countries [10.939989206795047]
  Low-Resource Language Countries (LRLCs) have a share of AI users that is approximately 20% lower relative to their baseline.<n> linguistic accessibility is a significant, independent barrier to equitable AI diffusion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-04T17:31:39Z)
• Natural language processing for African languages [7.884789325654572]
  dissertation focuses on languages spoken in Sub-Saharan Africa where all the indigenous languages can be regarded as low-resourced.<n>We show that the quality of semantic representations learned in word embeddings does not only depend on the amount of data but on the quality of pre-training data.<n>We develop large scale human-annotated labelled datasets for 21 African languages in two impactful NLP tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-30T22:26:36Z)
• FormosanBench: Benchmarking Low-Resource Austronesian Languages in the Era of Large Language Models [1.2403152094314245]
  We introduce FORMOSANBENCH, the first benchmark for evaluating large language models (LLMs) on low-resource Austronesian languages.<n>We assess model performance in zero-shot, 10-shot, and fine-tuned settings using FORMOSANBENCH.<n>Our results reveal a substantial performance gap between high-resource and Formosan languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-12T07:02:28Z)
• Enhancing Code Generation for Low-Resource Languages: No Silver Bullet [55.39571645315926]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) rely on large and diverse datasets to learn syntax, semantics, and usage patterns of programming languages. For low-resource languages, the limited availability of such data hampers the models' ability to generalize effectively. We present an empirical study investigating the effectiveness of several approaches for boosting LLMs' performance on low-resource languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-31T12:23:28Z)
• On Limitations of LLM as Annotator for Low Resource Languages [0.4194295877935868]
  Low-resource languages face significant challenges due to the lack of sufficient linguistic data, resources, and tools for tasks such as supervised learning, annotation, and classification. This shortage hinders the development of accurate models and datasets, making it difficult to perform critical NLP tasks like sentiment analysis or hate speech detection. To bridge this gap, Large Language Models (LLMs) present an opportunity for potential annotators, capable of generating datasets and resources for these underrepresented languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-26T17:55:37Z)
• ELAICHI: Enhancing Low-resource TTS by Addressing Infrequent and Low-frequency Character Bigrams [16.172599163455693]
  We leverage high-quality data from linguistically or geographically related languages to improve TTS for the target language. Second, we utilize low-quality Automatic Speech Recognition (ASR) data recorded in non-studio environments, which is refined using denoising and speech enhancement models. Third, we apply knowledge distillation from large-scale models using synthetic data to generate more robust outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-23T14:18:25Z)
• Do Large Language Models Speak All Languages Equally? A Comparative Study in Low-Resource Settings [12.507989493130175]
  Large language models (LLMs) have garnered significant interest in natural language processing (NLP) Recent studies have highlighted the limitations of LLMs in low-resource languages. We present datasets for sentiment and hate speech tasks by translating from English to Bangla, Hindi, and Urdu.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-05T05:09:23Z)
• LLMs in the Loop: Leveraging Large Language Model Annotations for Active Learning in Low-Resource Languages [1.149936119867417]
  Low-resource languages face significant barriers in AI development due to limited linguistic resources and expertise for data labeling. We propose leveraging the potential of LLMs in the active learning loop for data annotation. Empirical evaluations, notably employing GPT-4-Turbo, demonstrate near-state-of-the-art performance with significantly reduced data requirements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-02T19:34:22Z)
• No Language is an Island: Unifying Chinese and English in Financial Large Language Models, Instruction Data, and Benchmarks [75.29561463156635]
  ICE-PIXIU uniquely integrates a spectrum of Chinese tasks, alongside translated and original English datasets. It provides unrestricted access to diverse model variants, a compilation of diverse cross-lingual and multi-modal instruction data, and an evaluation benchmark with expert annotations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-10T16:22:20Z)
• High-quality Data-to-Text Generation for Severely Under-Resourced Languages with Out-of-the-box Large Language Models [5.632410663467911]
  We explore the extent to which pretrained large language models (LLMs) can bridge the performance gap for under-resourced languages. We find that LLMs easily set the state of the art for the under-resourced languages by substantial margins. For all our languages, human evaluation shows on-a-par performance with humans for our best systems, but BLEU scores collapse compared to English.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T16:29:40Z)
• Natural Language Processing for Dialects of a Language: A Survey [56.93337350526933]
  State-of-the-art natural language processing (NLP) models are trained on massive training corpora, and report a superlative performance on evaluation datasets. This survey delves into an important attribute of these datasets: the dialect of a language. Motivated by the performance degradation of NLP models for dialectic datasets and its implications for the equity of language technologies, we survey past research in NLP for dialects in terms of datasets, and approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-11T03:04:38Z)
• Zero-Shot Cross-Lingual Reranking with Large Language Models for Low-Resource Languages [51.301942056881146]
  We investigate how large language models (LLMs) function as rerankers in cross-lingual information retrieval systems for African languages. Our implementation covers English and four African languages (Hausa, Somali, Swahili, and Yoruba) We examine cross-lingual reranking with queries in English and passages in the African languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-26T18:38:54Z)
• Democratizing LLMs for Low-Resource Languages by Leveraging their English Dominant Abilities with Linguistically-Diverse Prompts [75.33019401706188]
  Large language models (LLMs) are known to effectively perform tasks by simply observing few exemplars. We propose to assemble synthetic exemplars from a diverse set of high-resource languages to prompt the LLMs to translate from any language into English. Our unsupervised prompting method performs on par with supervised few-shot learning in LLMs of different sizes for translations between English and 13 Indic and 21 African low-resource languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-20T08:27:47Z)
• Do All Languages Cost the Same? Tokenization in the Era of Commercial Language Models [68.29126169579132]
  API vendors charge their users based on usage, more specifically on the number of tokens'' processed or generated by the underlying language models. What constitutes a token, however, is training data and model dependent with a large variance in the number of tokens required to convey the same information in different languages. We conduct a systematic analysis of the cost and utility of OpenAI's language model API on multilingual benchmarks in 22 typologically diverse languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-23T05:46:45Z)
• A Survey of Large Language Models [81.06947636926638]
  Language modeling has been widely studied for language understanding and generation in the past two decades. Recently, pre-trained language models (PLMs) have been proposed by pre-training Transformer models over large-scale corpora. To discriminate the difference in parameter scale, the research community has coined the term large language models (LLM) for the PLMs of significant size.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-31T17:28:46Z)
• Adapting to the Low-Resource Double-Bind: Investigating Low-Compute Methods on Low-Resource African Languages [0.6833698896122186]
  Access to high computational resources added to the issue of data scarcity of African languages. We evaluate language adapters as cost-effective approaches to low-resource African NLP. This opens the door to further experimentation and exploration on full-extent of language adapters capacities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-29T19:25:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.