LLMs in the Loop: Leveraging Large Language Model Annotations for Active Learning in Low-Resource Languages
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.02261v2
- Date: Sun, 23 Jun 2024 18:21:01 GMT
- Title: LLMs in the Loop: Leveraging Large Language Model Annotations for Active Learning in Low-Resource Languages
- Authors: Nataliia Kholodna, Sahib Julka, Mohammad Khodadadi, Muhammed Nurullah Gumus, Michael Granitzer,
- Abstract summary: Low-resource languages face significant barriers in AI development due to limited linguistic resources and expertise for data labeling.
We propose leveraging the potential of LLMs in the active learning loop for data annotation.
Empirical evaluations, notably employing GPT-4-Turbo, demonstrate near-state-of-the-art performance with significantly reduced data requirements.
- Score: 1.149936119867417
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Low-resource languages face significant barriers in AI development due to limited linguistic resources and expertise for data labeling, rendering them rare and costly. The scarcity of data and the absence of preexisting tools exacerbate these challenges, especially since these languages may not be adequately represented in various NLP datasets. To address this gap, we propose leveraging the potential of LLMs in the active learning loop for data annotation. Initially, we conduct evaluations to assess inter-annotator agreement and consistency, facilitating the selection of a suitable LLM annotator. The chosen annotator is then integrated into a training loop for a classifier using an active learning paradigm, minimizing the amount of queried data required. Empirical evaluations, notably employing GPT-4-Turbo, demonstrate near-state-of-the-art performance with significantly reduced data requirements, as indicated by estimated potential cost savings of at least 42.45 times compared to human annotation. Our proposed solution shows promising potential to substantially reduce both the monetary and computational costs associated with automation in low-resource settings. By bridging the gap between low-resource languages and AI, this approach fosters broader inclusion and shows the potential to enable automation across diverse linguistic landscapes.
Related papers
- RA-BLIP: Multimodal Adaptive Retrieval-Augmented Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training [55.54020926284334]
Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have recently received substantial interest, which shows their emerging potential as general-purpose models for various vision-language tasks.
Retrieval augmentation techniques have proven to be effective plugins for both LLMs and MLLMs.
In this study, we propose multimodal adaptive Retrieval-Augmented Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training (RA-BLIP), a novel retrieval-augmented framework for various MLLMs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-18T03:45:19Z) - Double Jeopardy and Climate Impact in the Use of Large Language Models: Socio-economic Disparities and Reduced Utility for Non-English Speakers [0.0]
We show that English speakers face higher costs when using OpenAI's GPT models via APIs because of how the system processes the input -- tokenization.
Around 1.5 billion people, speaking languages primarily from lower-middle-income countries, could incur costs that are 4 to 6 times higher than those faced by English speakers.
This underscores the need for fairer algorithm development to benefit all linguistic groups.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-14T16:11:04Z) - Boosting the Capabilities of Compact Models in Low-Data Contexts with Large Language Models and Retrieval-Augmented Generation [2.9921619703037274]
We propose a retrieval augmented generation (RAG) framework backed by a large language model (LLM) to correct the output of a smaller model for the linguistic task of morphological glossing.
We leverage linguistic information to make up for the lack of data and trainable parameters, while allowing for inputs from written descriptive grammars interpreted and distilled through an LLM.
We show that a compact, RAG-supported model is highly effective in data-scarce settings, achieving a new state-of-the-art for this task and our target languages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-01T04:20:14Z) - Exploring the Impact of Data Quantity on ASR in Extremely Low-resource Languages [24.856817602140193]
This study focuses on two endangered Austronesian languages, Amis and Seediq.
We propose a novel data-selection scheme leveraging a multilingual corpus to augment the limited target language data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-13T14:35:47Z) - Unlocking the Potential of Model Merging for Low-Resource Languages [66.7716891808697]
Adapting large language models to new languages typically involves continual pre-training (CT) followed by supervised fine-tuning (SFT)
We propose model merging as an alternative for low-resource languages, combining models with distinct capabilities into a single model without additional training.
Experiments based on Llama-2-7B demonstrate that model merging effectively endows LLMs for low-resource languages with task-solving abilities, outperforming CT-then-SFT in scenarios with extremely scarce data.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-04T15:14:17Z) - Self-training Large Language Models through Knowledge Detection [26.831873737733737]
Large language models (LLMs) often necessitate extensive labeled datasets and training compute to achieve impressive performance across downstream tasks.
This paper explores a self-training paradigm, where the LLM autonomously curates its own labels and selectively trains on unknown data samples.
Empirical evaluations demonstrate significant improvements in reducing hallucination in generation across multiple subjects.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-17T07:25:09Z) - DIALIGHT: Lightweight Multilingual Development and Evaluation of
Task-Oriented Dialogue Systems with Large Language Models [76.79929883963275]
DIALIGHT is a toolkit for developing and evaluating multilingual Task-Oriented Dialogue (ToD) systems.
It features a secure, user-friendly web interface for fine-grained human evaluation at both local utterance level and global dialogue level.
Our evaluations reveal that while PLM fine-tuning leads to higher accuracy and coherence, LLM-based systems excel in producing diverse and likeable responses.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-04T11:27:48Z) - CoAnnotating: Uncertainty-Guided Work Allocation between Human and Large
Language Models for Data Annotation [94.59630161324013]
We propose CoAnnotating, a novel paradigm for Human-LLM co-annotation of unstructured texts at scale.
Our empirical study shows CoAnnotating to be an effective means to allocate work from results on different datasets, with up to 21% performance improvement over random baseline.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-24T08:56:49Z) - Democratizing LLMs for Low-Resource Languages by Leveraging their English Dominant Abilities with Linguistically-Diverse Prompts [75.33019401706188]
Large language models (LLMs) are known to effectively perform tasks by simply observing few exemplars.
We propose to assemble synthetic exemplars from a diverse set of high-resource languages to prompt the LLMs to translate from any language into English.
Our unsupervised prompting method performs on par with supervised few-shot learning in LLMs of different sizes for translations between English and 13 Indic and 21 African low-resource languages.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-20T08:27:47Z) - OverPrompt: Enhancing ChatGPT through Efficient In-Context Learning [49.38867353135258]
We propose OverPrompt, leveraging the in-context learning capability of LLMs to handle multiple task inputs.
Our experiments show that OverPrompt can achieve cost-efficient zero-shot classification without causing significant detriment to task performance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-24T10:08:04Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.