Before & After: The Effect of EU's 2022 Code of Practice on Disinformation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.11369v1
• Date: Tue, 15 Oct 2024 07:48:43 GMT
• Title: Before & After: The Effect of EU's 2022 Code of Practice on Disinformation
• Authors: Emmanouil Papadogiannakis, Panagiotis Papadopoulos, Nicolas Kourtellis, Evangelos P. Markatos,
• Abstract summary: We show that ad networks have withdrawn mostly from unpopular misinformation websites with very few visitors. We show that ad networks continue to place advertisements of legitimate companies next to misinformation content. In fact, major ad networks place ads in almost 400 misinformation websites of our dataset.
• Score: 2.1456348289599134
• License:
• Abstract: Over the past few years, the European Commission has made significant steps to reduce disinformation in cyberspace. One of those steps has been the introduction of the 2022 "Strengthened Code of Practice on Disinformation". Signed by leading online platforms, this Strengthened Code of Practice on Disinformation is an attempt to combat disinformation on the Web. The Code of Practice includes a variety of measures including the demonetization of disinformation, urging, for example, advertisers "to avoid the placement of advertising next to Disinformation content". In this work, we set out to explore what was the impact of the Code of Practice and especially to explore to what extent ad networks continue to advertise on dis-/mis-information sites. We perform a historical analysis and find that, although at a hasty glance things may seem to be improving, there is really no significant reduction in the amount of advertising relationships among popular misinformation websites and major ad networks. In fact, we show that ad networks have withdrawn mostly from unpopular misinformation websites with very few visitors, but still form relationships with highly unreliable websites that account for the majority of misinformation traffic. To make matters worse, we show that ad networks continue to place advertisements of legitimate companies next to misinformation content. In fact, major ad networks place ads in almost 400 misinformation websites of our dataset.

Related papers

• Accessibility Issues in Ad-Driven Web Applications [3.9531869396416344]
  Third-party advertisements (ads) are a vital revenue source for free web services, but they introduce significant accessibility challenges. We conduct the first large-scale investigation of 430K website elements, including nearly 100K ad elements, to understand the accessibility of ads on websites.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-27T09:50:06Z)
• Why am I Still Seeing This: Measuring the Effectiveness Of Ad Controls and Explanations in AI-Mediated Ad Targeting Systems [55.02903075972816]
  We evaluate the effectiveness of Meta's "See less" ad control and the actionability of ad targeting explanations following the shift to AI-mediated targeting. We find that utilizing the "See less" ad control for the topics we study does not significantly reduce the number of ads shown by Meta on these topics. We find that the majority of ad targeting explanations for local ads made no reference to location-specific targeting criteria.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-21T18:03:11Z)
• Finding Fake News Websites in the Wild [0.0860395700487494]
  We propose a novel methodology for identifying websites responsible for creating and disseminating misinformation content. We validate our approach on Twitter by examining various execution modes and contexts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-09T18:00:12Z)
• Before Blue Birds Became X-tinct: Understanding the Effect of Regime Change on Twitter's Advertising and Compliance of Advertising Policies [0.562479170374811]
  We present the first large-scale audit of advertising on Twitter focusing on compliance with the platform's advertising policies. We find evidence of widespread noncompliance with Twitter's political and adult content advertising policies. Major brands decreased their advertising on Twitter, suggesting a negative immediate effect on the platform's advertising revenue.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-22T02:39:53Z)
• Discrimination through Image Selection by Job Advertisers on Facebook [79.21648699199648]
  We propose and investigate the prevalence of a new means for discrimination in job advertising. It combines both targeting and delivery -- through the disproportionate representation or exclusion of people of certain demographics in job ad images. We use the Facebook Ad Library to demonstrate the prevalence of this practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-13T03:43:58Z)
• Multilingual Disinformation Detection for Digital Advertising [0.9684919127633844]
  We make the first step towards quickly detecting and red-flaging websites that potentially manipulate the public with disinformation. We build a machine learning model based on multilingual text embeddings that first determines whether the page mentions a topic of interest, then estimates the likelihood of the content being malicious. Our system empowers internal teams to proactively blacklist unsafe content, thus protecting the reputation of the advertisement provider.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-04T10:29:20Z)
• Adherence to Misinformation on Social Media Through Socio-Cognitive and Group-Based Processes [79.79659145328856]
  We argue that when misinformation proliferates, this happens because the social media environment enables adherence to misinformation. We make the case that polarization and misinformation adherence are closely tied.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-30T12:34:24Z)
• DISCO: Comprehensive and Explainable Disinformation Detection [71.5283511752544]
  We propose a comprehensive and explainable disinformation detection framework called DISCO. We demonstrate DISCO on a real-world fake news detection task with satisfactory detection accuracy and explanation. We expect that our demo could pave the way for addressing the limitations of identification, comprehension, and explainability as a whole.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-09T18:17:25Z)
• Defending Democracy: Using Deep Learning to Identify and Prevent Misinformation [0.0]
  This study classifies and visualizes the spread of misinformation on a social media network using publicly available Twitter data. The study further demonstrates the suitability of BERT for providing a scalable model for false information detection.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-03T16:34:54Z)
• Cross-Domain Learning for Classifying Propaganda in Online Contents [67.10699378370752]
  We present an approach to leverage cross-domain learning, based on labeled documents and sentences from news and tweets, as well as political speeches with a clear difference in their degrees of being propagandistic. Our experiments demonstrate the usefulness of this approach, and identify difficulties and limitations in various configurations of sources and targets for the transfer step.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-13T10:19:13Z)
• An Empirical Study of In-App Advertising Issues Based on Large Scale App Review Analysis [67.58267006314415]
  We present a large-scale analysis on ad-related user feedback from App Store and Google Play. From a statistical analysis of 36,309 ad-related reviews, we find that users care most about the number of unique ads and ad display frequency during usage. Some ad issue types are addressed more quickly by developers than other ad issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-22T05:38:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.