Why am I Still Seeing This: Measuring the Effectiveness Of Ad Controls and Explanations in AI-Mediated Ad Targeting Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2408.11910v1
• Date: Wed, 21 Aug 2024 18:03:11 GMT
• Title: Why am I Still Seeing This: Measuring the Effectiveness Of Ad Controls and Explanations in AI-Mediated Ad Targeting Systems
• Authors: Jane Castleman, Aleksandra Korolova,
• Abstract summary: We evaluate the effectiveness of Meta's "See less" ad control and the actionability of ad targeting explanations following the shift to AI-mediated targeting. We find that utilizing the "See less" ad control for the topics we study does not significantly reduce the number of ads shown by Meta on these topics. We find that the majority of ad targeting explanations for local ads made no reference to location-specific targeting criteria.
• Score: 55.02903075972816
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Recently, Meta has shifted towards AI-mediated ad targeting mechanisms that do not require advertisers to provide detailed targeting criteria, likely driven by excitement over AI capabilities as well as new data privacy policies and targeting changes agreed upon in civil rights settlements. At the same time, Meta has touted their ad preference controls as an effective mechanism for users to control the ads they see. Furthermore, Meta markets their targeting explanations as a transparency tool that allows users to understand why they saw certain ads and inform actions to control future ads. Our study evaluates the effectiveness of Meta's "See less" ad control and the actionability of ad targeting explanations following the shift to AI-mediated targeting. We conduct a large-scale study, randomly assigning participants to mark "See less" to Body Weight Control or Parenting topics, and collecting the ads and targeting explanations Meta shows to participants before and after the intervention. We find that utilizing the "See less" ad control for the topics we study does not significantly reduce the number of ads shown by Meta on these topics, and that the control is less effective for some users whose demographics are correlated with the topic. Furthermore, we find that the majority of ad targeting explanations for local ads made no reference to location-specific targeting criteria, and did not inform users why ads related to the topics they marked to "See less" of continued to be delivered. We hypothesize that the poor effectiveness of controls and lack of actionability in explanations are the result of the shift to AI-mediated targeting, for which explainability and transparency tools have not yet been developed. Our work thus provides evidence for the need of new methods for transparency and user control, suitable and reflective of increasingly complex AI-mediated ad delivery systems.

Related papers

• On the Use of Proxies in Political Ad Targeting [49.61009579554272]
  We show that major political advertisers circumvented mitigations by targeting proxy attributes. Our findings have crucial implications for the ongoing discussion on the regulation of political advertising.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T17:15:13Z)
• Advertiser Content Understanding via LLMs for Google Ads Safety [9.376815457907195]
  This study proposes a method to understand advertiser's intent for content policy violations, using Large Language Models (LLMs) We generate advertiser's content profile based on multiple signals from their ads, domains, targeting info, etc. After minimal prompt tuning our method was able to reach 95% accuracy on a small test set.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-10T00:57:51Z)
• Online Ad Procurement in Non-stationary Autobidding Worlds [10.871587311621974]
  We introduce a primal-dual algorithm for online decision making with multi-dimension decision variables, bandit feedback and long-term uncertain constraints. We show that our algorithm achieves low regret in many worlds when procurement outcomes are generated through procedures that are adversarial, adversarially corrupted, periodic, and ergodic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-10T00:41:08Z)
• Discrimination through Image Selection by Job Advertisers on Facebook [79.21648699199648]
  We propose and investigate the prevalence of a new means for discrimination in job advertising. It combines both targeting and delivery -- through the disproportionate representation or exclusion of people of certain demographics in job ad images. We use the Facebook Ad Library to demonstrate the prevalence of this practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-13T03:43:58Z)
• Exploring the Online Micro-targeting Practices of Small, Medium, and Large Businesses [0.0]
  The European Commission plans to restrict or ban some targeting functionalities in the new European Democracy Action Plan act. We take a first step by understanding who is advertising on Facebook and how they use the targeting functionalities. We found that only 32% of small and medium-sized businesses and 30% of large-sized businesses micro-target at least one of their ads.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-07-19T14:16:54Z)
• AI-Driven Contextual Advertising: A Technology Report and Implication Analysis [0.0]
  Programmatic advertising consists in automated auctioning of digital ad space. The interest in contextual advertising is in part a counterreaction to the current dependency on personal data. Developments in Artificial Intelligence (AI) allow for a deeper semantic understanding of context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-02T13:44:58Z)
• Causal Inference in the Presence of Interference in Sponsored Search Advertising [11.514573594428352]
  In this paper, we leverage the language of causal inference in the presence of interference to model interactions among the ads. We illustrate the utility of our formalization through experiments carried out on the ad placement system of the Bing search engine.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-15T01:13:14Z)
• Learning to Infer User Hidden States for Online Sequential Advertising [52.169666997331724]
  We propose our Deep Intents Sequential Advertising (DISA) method to address these issues. The key part of interpretability is to understand a consumer's purchase intent which is, however, unobservable (called hidden states)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-03T05:12:26Z)
• An Empirical Study of In-App Advertising Issues Based on Large Scale App Review Analysis [67.58267006314415]
  We present a large-scale analysis on ad-related user feedback from App Store and Google Play. From a statistical analysis of 36,309 ad-related reviews, we find that users care most about the number of unique ads and ad display frequency during usage. Some ad issue types are addressed more quickly by developers than other ad issues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-22T05:38:24Z)
• Do Interruptions Pay Off? Effects of Interruptive Ads on Consumers Willingness to Pay [79.9312329825761]
  We present the results of a study designed to measure the impact of interruptive advertising on consumers willingness to pay for products bearing the advertiser's brand. Our results contribute to the research on the economic impact of advertising, and introduce a method of measuring actual (as opposed to self-reported) willingness to pay in experimental marketing research.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-14T09:26:57Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.