Conditional Outcome Equivalence: A Quantile Alternative to CATE

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.12454v1
• Date: Wed, 16 Oct 2024 11:04:16 GMT
• Title: Conditional Outcome Equivalence: A Quantile Alternative to CATE
• Authors: Josh Givens, Henry W J Reeve, Song Liu, Katarzyna Reluga,
• Abstract summary: Conditional quantile treatment effect (CQTE) can provide insight into the effect of a treatment beyond the conditional average treatment effect (CATE) The estimation of CQTE is challenging and often depends upon the smoothness of the individual quantiles. We propose a new estimand, the conditional quantile comparator (CQC)
• Score: 7.298573111387454
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Conditional quantile treatment effect (CQTE) can provide insight into the effect of a treatment beyond the conditional average treatment effect (CATE). This ability to provide information over multiple quantiles of the response makes CQTE especially valuable in cases where the effect of a treatment is not well-modelled by a location shift, even conditionally on the covariates. Nevertheless, the estimation of CQTE is challenging and often depends upon the smoothness of the individual quantiles as a function of the covariates rather than smoothness of the CQTE itself. This is in stark contrast to CATE where it is possible to obtain high-quality estimates which have less dependency upon the smoothness of the nuisance parameters when the CATE itself is smooth. Moreover, relative smoothness of the CQTE lacks the interpretability of smoothness of the CATE making it less clear whether it is a reasonable assumption to make. We combine the desirable properties of CATE and CQTE by considering a new estimand, the conditional quantile comparator (CQC). The CQC not only retains information about the whole treatment distribution, similar to CQTE, but also having more natural examples of smoothness and is able to leverage simplicity in an auxiliary estimand. We provide finite sample bounds on the error of our estimator, demonstrating its ability to exploit simplicity. We validate our theory in numerical simulations which show that our method produces more accurate estimates than baselines. Finally, we apply our methodology to a study on the effect of employment incentives on earnings across different age groups. We see that our method is able to reveal heterogeneity of the effect across different quantiles.

Related papers

• Direct Doubly Robust Estimation of Conditional Quantile Contrasts [8.035129168712334]
  Conditional quantile comparator (CQC) offers quantile-level summaries akin to the conditional quantile treatment effect (CQTE)<n>Current estimation is limited by the need to first estimate the difference in conditional cumulative distribution functions and then invert it.<n>We propose the first direct estimator of the CQC, allowing for explicit modelling and parameterisation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-27T14:46:25Z)
• On the Convergence of DP-SGD with Adaptive Clipping [56.24689348875711]
  Gradient Descent with gradient clipping is a powerful technique for enabling differentially private optimization. This paper provides the first comprehensive convergence analysis of SGD with quantile clipping (QC-SGD) We show how QC-SGD suffers from a bias problem similar to constant-threshold clipped SGD but can be mitigated through a carefully designed quantile and step size schedule.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-27T20:29:47Z)
• Can Constrained Quantum Annealing Be Effective in Noisy Quantum Annealers? [0.0]
  We investigate the performance of penalty-based quantum annealing (PQA) and constrained quantum annealing (CQA) for graph partitioning problems. PQA generally demonstrates relatively stable success probabilities, while CQA's performance varies significantly across problem instances. CQA experiences leakage from the constraint-satisfying subspace under most noise models, with the exception of phase-flip noise.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-23T03:12:45Z)
• Unifying (Quantum) Statistical and Parametrized (Quantum) Algorithms [65.268245109828]
  We take inspiration from Kearns' SQ oracle and Valiant's weak evaluation oracle. We introduce an extensive yet intuitive framework that yields unconditional lower bounds for learning from evaluation queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-26T18:23:21Z)
• Evaluating Dynamic Conditional Quantile Treatment Effects with Applications in Ridesharing [15.35497380896072]
  We establish a formal framework to calculate dynamic quantile treatment effects (QTE) on characteristics independent of the treatment. We then introduce two varying coefficient decision process (VCDP) models and devise an innovative method to test the dynamic CQTE. To showcase the practical utility of our method, we apply it to three real-world datasets from a ride-sourcing platform.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-17T13:12:48Z)
• Conformalized Unconditional Quantile Regression [27.528258690139793]
  We develop a predictive inference procedure that combines conformal prediction with unconditional quantile regression. We show that our procedure is adaptive to heteroscedasticity, provides transparent coverage guarantees that are relevant to the test instance at hand, and performs competitively with existing methods in terms of efficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-04T00:20:26Z)
• Adaptive Conformal Prediction by Reweighting Nonconformity Score [0.0]
  We use a Quantile Regression Forest (QRF) to learn the distribution of nonconformity scores and utilize the QRF's weights to assign more importance to samples with residuals similar to the test point. Our approach enjoys an assumption-free finite sample marginal and training-conditional coverage, and under suitable assumptions, it also ensures conditional coverage.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-22T16:42:19Z)
• Robust and Agnostic Learning of Conditional Distributional Treatment Effects [62.44901952244514]
  The conditional average treatment effect (CATE) is the best point prediction of individual causal effects. In aggregate analyses, this is usually addressed by measuring distributional treatment effect (DTE) We provide a new robust and model-agnostic methodology for learning the conditional DTE (CDTE) for a wide class of problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-23T17:40:31Z)
• Treatment Effect Risk: Bounds and Inference [58.442274475425144]
  Since the average treatment effect measures the change in social welfare, even if positive, there is a risk of negative effect on, say, some 10% of the population. In this paper we consider how to nonetheless assess this important risk measure, formalized as the conditional value at risk (CVaR) of the ITE distribution. Some bounds can also be interpreted as summarizing a complex CATE function into a single metric and are of interest independently of being a bound.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-15T17:21:26Z)
• Sparse Feature Selection Makes Batch Reinforcement Learning More Sample Efficient [62.24615324523435]
  This paper provides a statistical analysis of high-dimensional batch Reinforcement Learning (RL) using sparse linear function approximation. When there is a large number of candidate features, our result sheds light on the fact that sparsity-aware methods can make batch RL more sample efficient.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-08T16:48:02Z)
• Counterfactual Variable Control for Robust and Interpretable Question Answering [57.25261576239862]
  Deep neural network based question answering (QA) models are neither robust nor explainable in many cases. In this paper, we inspect such spurious "capability" of QA models using causal inference. We propose a novel approach called Counterfactual Variable Control (CVC) that explicitly mitigates any shortcut correlation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-12T10:09:05Z)
• Localized Debiased Machine Learning: Efficient Inference on Quantile Treatment Effects and Beyond [69.83813153444115]
  We consider an efficient estimating equation for the (local) quantile treatment effect ((L)QTE) in causal inference. Debiased machine learning (DML) is a data-splitting approach to estimating high-dimensional nuisances. We propose localized debiased machine learning (LDML), which avoids this burdensome step.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-12-30T14:42:52Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.