Investigating Implicit Bias in Large Language Models: A Large-Scale Study of Over 50 LLMs
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.12864v1
- Date: Sun, 13 Oct 2024 03:43:18 GMT
- Title: Investigating Implicit Bias in Large Language Models: A Large-Scale Study of Over 50 LLMs
- Authors: Divyanshu Kumar, Umang Jain, Sahil Agarwal, Prashanth Harshangi,
- Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) are being adopted across a wide range of tasks.
Recent research indicates that LLMs can harbor implicit biases even when they pass explicit bias evaluations.
This study highlights that newer or larger language models do not automatically exhibit reduced bias.
- Score: 0.0
- License:
- Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) are being adopted across a wide range of tasks, including decision-making processes in industries where bias in AI systems is a significant concern. Recent research indicates that LLMs can harbor implicit biases even when they pass explicit bias evaluations. Building upon the frameworks of the LLM Implicit Association Test (IAT) Bias and LLM Decision Bias, this study highlights that newer or larger language models do not automatically exhibit reduced bias; in some cases, they displayed higher bias scores than their predecessors, such as in Meta's Llama series and OpenAI's GPT models. This suggests that increasing model complexity without deliberate bias mitigation strategies can unintentionally amplify existing biases. The variability in bias scores within and across providers underscores the need for standardized evaluation metrics and benchmarks for bias assessment. The lack of consistency indicates that bias mitigation is not yet a universally prioritized goal in model development, which can lead to unfair or discriminatory outcomes. By broadening the detection of implicit bias, this research provides a more comprehensive understanding of the biases present in advanced models and underscores the critical importance of addressing these issues to ensure the development of fair and responsible AI systems.
Related papers
- Towards Resource Efficient and Interpretable Bias Mitigation in Large Language Models [1.787433808079955]
Large language models (LLMs) have been observed to perpetuate unwanted biases in training data.
In this paper, we mitigate bias by leveraging small biased and anti-biased expert models to obtain a debiasing signal.
Experiments on mitigating gender, race, and religion biases show a reduction in bias on several local and global bias metrics.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-12-02T16:56:08Z) - How far can bias go? -- Tracing bias from pretraining data to alignment [54.51310112013655]
This study examines the correlation between gender-occupation bias in pre-training data and their manifestation in LLMs.
Our findings reveal that biases present in pre-training data are amplified in model outputs.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-28T16:20:25Z) - Bias Similarity Across Large Language Models [32.0365189539138]
We analyze bias through output distribution across multiple dimensions using two datasets (4K and 1M questions)
Our results show that fine-tuning has minimal impact on output distributions, and proprietary models tend to overly response as unknowns to minimize bias, compromising accuracy and utility.
Open-source models like Llama3-Chat and Gemma2-it demonstrate fairness comparable to proprietary models like GPT-4, challenging the assumption that larger, closed-source models are inherently less biased.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-15T19:21:14Z) - Editable Fairness: Fine-Grained Bias Mitigation in Language Models [52.66450426729818]
We propose a novel debiasing approach, Fairness Stamp (FAST), which enables fine-grained calibration of individual social biases.
FAST surpasses state-of-the-art baselines with superior debiasing performance.
This highlights the potential of fine-grained debiasing strategies to achieve fairness in large language models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-07T17:14:58Z) - The African Woman is Rhythmic and Soulful: An Investigation of Implicit Biases in LLM Open-ended Text Generation [3.9945212716333063]
Implicit biases are significant because they influence the decisions made by Large Language Models (LLMs)
Traditionally, explicit bias tests or embedding-based methods are employed to detect bias, but these approaches can overlook more nuanced, implicit forms of bias.
We introduce two novel psychological-inspired methodologies to reveal and measure implicit biases through prompt-based and decision-making tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-01T13:21:33Z) - VLBiasBench: A Comprehensive Benchmark for Evaluating Bias in Large Vision-Language Model [72.13121434085116]
We introduce VLBiasBench, a benchmark to evaluate biases in Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs)
VLBiasBench features a dataset that covers nine distinct categories of social biases, including age, disability status, gender, nationality, physical appearance, race, religion, profession, social economic status, as well as two intersectional bias categories: race x gender and race x social economic status.
We conduct extensive evaluations on 15 open-source models as well as two advanced closed-source models, yielding new insights into the biases present in these models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-20T10:56:59Z) - Towards detecting unanticipated bias in Large Language Models [1.4589372436314496]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have exhibited fairness issues similar to those in previous machine learning systems.
This research focuses on analyzing and quantifying these biases in training data and their impact on the decisions of these models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-03T11:25:20Z) - GPTBIAS: A Comprehensive Framework for Evaluating Bias in Large Language
Models [83.30078426829627]
Large language models (LLMs) have gained popularity and are being widely adopted by a large user community.
The existing evaluation methods have many constraints, and their results exhibit a limited degree of interpretability.
We propose a bias evaluation framework named GPTBIAS that leverages the high performance of LLMs to assess bias in models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-11T12:02:14Z) - General Greedy De-bias Learning [163.65789778416172]
We propose a General Greedy De-bias learning framework (GGD), which greedily trains the biased models and the base model like gradient descent in functional space.
GGD can learn a more robust base model under the settings of both task-specific biased models with prior knowledge and self-ensemble biased model without prior knowledge.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-12-20T14:47:32Z) - Towards Debiasing NLU Models from Unknown Biases [70.31427277842239]
NLU models often exploit biases to achieve high dataset-specific performance without properly learning the intended task.
We present a self-debiasing framework that prevents models from mainly utilizing biases without knowing them in advance.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-25T15:49:39Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.