Do LLMs Have Political Correctness? Analyzing Ethical Biases and Jailbreak Vulnerabilities in AI Systems

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.13334v2
• Date: Wed, 23 Oct 2024 02:15:52 GMT
• Title: Do LLMs Have Political Correctness? Analyzing Ethical Biases and Jailbreak Vulnerabilities in AI Systems
• Authors: Isack Lee, Haebin Seong,
• Abstract summary: We introduce the concept of PCJailbreak, highlighting the inherent risks posed by these safety-induced biases. We propose an efficient defense method PCDefense, which prevents jailbreak attempts by injecting defense prompts prior to generation.
• Score: 0.0
• License:
• Abstract: Although large language models (LLMs) demonstrate impressive proficiency in various tasks, they present potential safety risks, such as `jailbreaks', where malicious inputs can coerce LLMs into generating harmful content. To address these issues, many LLM developers have implemented various safety measures to align these models. This alignment involves several techniques, including data filtering during pre-training, supervised fine-tuning, reinforcement learning from human feedback, and red-teaming exercises. These methods often introduce deliberate and intentional biases similar to Political Correctness (PC) to ensure the ethical behavior of LLMs. In this paper, we delve into the intentional biases injected into LLMs for safety purposes and examine methods to circumvent these safety alignment techniques. Notably, these intentional biases result in a jailbreaking success rate in GPT-4o models that differs by 20% between non-binary and cisgender keywords and by 16% between white and black keywords, even when the other parts of the prompts are identical. We introduce the concept of PCJailbreak, highlighting the inherent risks posed by these safety-induced biases. Additionally, we propose an efficient defense method PCDefense, which prevents jailbreak attempts by injecting defense prompts prior to generation. PCDefense stands as an appealing alternative to Guard Models, such as Llama-Guard, that require additional inference cost after text generation. Our findings emphasize the urgent need for LLM developers to adopt a more responsible approach when designing and implementing safety measures.

Related papers

• Multi-round jailbreak attack on large language models [2.540971544359496]
  We introduce a multi-round jailbreak approach to better understand "jailbreak" attacks. This method can rewrite the dangerous prompts, decomposing them into a series of less harmful sub-questions. Our experimental results show a 94% success rate on the llama2-7B.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-15T12:08:14Z)
• The Dark Side of Function Calling: Pathways to Jailbreaking Large Language Models [8.423787598133972]
  This paper uncovers a critical vulnerability in the function calling process of large language models (LLMs) We introduce a novel "jailbreak function" attack method that exploits alignment discrepancies, user coercion, and the absence of rigorous safety filters. Our findings highlight the urgent need for enhanced security measures in the function calling capabilities of LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-25T10:09:21Z)
• Jailbreak Attacks and Defenses Against Large Language Models: A Survey [22.392989536664288]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have performed exceptionally in various text-generative tasks. "jailbreaking" induces the model to generate malicious responses against the usage policy and society. We propose a comprehensive and detailed taxonomy of jailbreak attack and defense methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-05T06:57:30Z)
• How Alignment and Jailbreak Work: Explain LLM Safety through Intermediate Hidden States [65.45603614354329]
  Large language models (LLMs) rely on safety alignment to avoid responding to malicious user inputs. Jailbreak can circumvent safety guardrails, resulting in LLMs generating harmful content. We employ weak classifiers to explain LLM safety through the intermediate hidden states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-09T05:04:37Z)
• Defensive Prompt Patch: A Robust and Interpretable Defense of LLMs against Jailbreak Attacks [59.46556573924901]
  This paper introduces Defensive Prompt Patch (DPP), a novel prompt-based defense mechanism for large language models (LLMs) Unlike previous approaches, DPP is designed to achieve a minimal Attack Success Rate (ASR) while preserving the high utility of LLMs. Empirical results conducted on LLAMA-2-7B-Chat and Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.2 models demonstrate the robustness and adaptability of DPP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-30T14:40:35Z)
• Fine-Tuning, Quantization, and LLMs: Navigating Unintended Outcomes [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have gained widespread adoption across various domains, including chatbots and auto-task completion agents. These models are susceptible to safety vulnerabilities such as jailbreaking, prompt injection, and privacy leakage attacks. This study investigates the impact of these modifications on LLM safety, a critical consideration for building reliable and secure AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-05T20:31:45Z)
• AdaShield: Safeguarding Multimodal Large Language Models from Structure-based Attack via Adaptive Shield Prompting [54.931241667414184]
  We propose textbfAdaptive textbfShield Prompting, which prepends inputs with defense prompts to defend MLLMs against structure-based jailbreak attacks. Our methods can consistently improve MLLMs' robustness against structure-based jailbreak attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-14T15:57:13Z)
• ASETF: A Novel Method for Jailbreak Attack on LLMs through Translate Suffix Embeddings [58.82536530615557]
  We propose an Adversarial Suffix Embedding Translation Framework (ASETF) to transform continuous adversarial suffix embeddings into coherent and understandable text. Our method significantly reduces the computation time of adversarial suffixes and achieves a much better attack success rate to existing techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-25T06:46:27Z)
• Jailbreaking Black Box Large Language Models in Twenty Queries [97.29563503097995]
  Large language models (LLMs) are vulnerable to adversarial jailbreaks. We propose an algorithm that generates semantic jailbreaks with only black-box access to an LLM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-12T15:38:28Z)
• Shadow Alignment: The Ease of Subverting Safely-Aligned Language Models [102.63973600144308]
  Open-source large language models can be easily subverted to generate harmful content. Experiments across 8 models released by 5 different organizations demonstrate the effectiveness of shadow alignment attack. This study serves as a clarion call for a collective effort to overhaul and fortify the safety of open-source LLMs against malicious attackers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-04T16:39:31Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.