Fine-Tuning, Quantization, and LLMs: Navigating Unintended Outcomes

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.04392v3
• Date: Mon, 9 Sep 2024 06:25:33 GMT
• Title: Fine-Tuning, Quantization, and LLMs: Navigating Unintended Outcomes
• Authors: Divyanshu Kumar, Anurakt Kumar, Sahil Agarwal, Prashanth Harshangi,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) have gained widespread adoption across various domains, including chatbots and auto-task completion agents. These models are susceptible to safety vulnerabilities such as jailbreaking, prompt injection, and privacy leakage attacks. This study investigates the impact of these modifications on LLM safety, a critical consideration for building reliable and secure AI systems.
• Score: 0.0
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have gained widespread adoption across various domains, including chatbots and auto-task completion agents. However, these models are susceptible to safety vulnerabilities such as jailbreaking, prompt injection, and privacy leakage attacks. These vulnerabilities can lead to the generation of malicious content, unauthorized actions, or the disclosure of confidential information. While foundational LLMs undergo alignment training and incorporate safety measures, they are often subject to fine-tuning, or doing quantization resource-constrained environments. This study investigates the impact of these modifications on LLM safety, a critical consideration for building reliable and secure AI systems. We evaluate foundational models including Mistral, Llama series, Qwen, and MosaicML, along with their fine-tuned variants. Our comprehensive analysis reveals that fine-tuning generally increases the success rates of jailbreak attacks, while quantization has variable effects on attack success rates. Importantly, we find that properly implemented guardrails significantly enhance resistance to jailbreak attempts. These findings contribute to our understanding of LLM vulnerabilities and provide insights for developing more robust safety strategies in the deployment of language models.

Related papers

• Adversarial Reasoning at Jailbreaking Time [49.70772424278124]
  We develop an adversarial reasoning approach to automatic jailbreaking via test-time computation. Our approach introduces a new paradigm in understanding LLM vulnerabilities, laying the foundation for the development of more robust and trustworthy AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-03T18:59:01Z)
• You Can't Eat Your Cake and Have It Too: The Performance Degradation of LLMs with Jailbreak Defense [34.023473699165315]
  We study the utility degradation, safety elevation, and exaggerated-safety escalation of LLMs with jailbreak defense strategies. We find that mainstream jailbreak defenses fail to ensure both safety and performance simultaneously.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-21T15:24:29Z)
• LLM-Virus: Evolutionary Jailbreak Attack on Large Language Models [59.29840790102413]
  Existing jailbreak attacks are primarily based on opaque optimization techniques and gradient search methods. We propose LLM-Virus, a jailbreak attack method based on evolutionary algorithm, termed evolutionary jailbreak. Our results show that LLM-Virus achieves competitive or even superior performance compared to existing attack methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-28T07:48:57Z)
• HarmLevelBench: Evaluating Harm-Level Compliance and the Impact of Quantization on Model Alignment [1.8843687952462742]
  This paper aims to address gaps in the current literature on jailbreaking techniques and the evaluation of LLM vulnerabilities. Our contributions include the creation of a novel dataset designed to assess the harmfulness of model outputs across multiple harm levels. We provide a comprehensive benchmark of state-of-the-art jailbreaking attacks, specifically targeting the Vicuna 13B v1.5 model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-11T10:02:49Z)
• Harnessing Task Overload for Scalable Jailbreak Attacks on Large Language Models [8.024771725860127]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) remain vulnerable to jailbreak attacks that bypass their safety mechanisms. We introduce a novel scalable jailbreak attack that preempts the activation of an LLM's safety policies by occupying its computational resources.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-05T15:10:01Z)
• Can LLMs be Fooled? Investigating Vulnerabilities in LLMs [4.927763944523323]
  The advent of Large Language Models (LLMs) has garnered significant popularity and wielded immense power across various domains within Natural Language Processing (NLP) This paper will synthesize the findings from each vulnerability section and propose new directions of research and development. By understanding the focal points of current vulnerabilities, we can better anticipate and mitigate future risks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-30T04:08:00Z)
• Defensive Prompt Patch: A Robust and Interpretable Defense of LLMs against Jailbreak Attacks [59.46556573924901]
  This paper introduces Defensive Prompt Patch (DPP), a novel prompt-based defense mechanism for large language models (LLMs) Unlike previous approaches, DPP is designed to achieve a minimal Attack Success Rate (ASR) while preserving the high utility of LLMs. Empirical results conducted on LLAMA-2-7B-Chat and Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.2 models demonstrate the robustness and adaptability of DPP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-30T14:40:35Z)
• Unveiling the Misuse Potential of Base Large Language Models via In-Context Learning [61.2224355547598]
  Open-sourcing of large language models (LLMs) accelerates application development, innovation, and scientific progress. Our investigation exposes a critical oversight in this belief. By deploying carefully designed demonstrations, our research demonstrates that base LLMs could effectively interpret and execute malicious instructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-16T13:22:54Z)
• AdaShield: Safeguarding Multimodal Large Language Models from Structure-based Attack via Adaptive Shield Prompting [54.931241667414184]
  We propose textbfAdaptive textbfShield Prompting, which prepends inputs with defense prompts to defend MLLMs against structure-based jailbreak attacks. Our methods can consistently improve MLLMs' robustness against structure-based jailbreak attacks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-14T15:57:13Z)
• Revisiting Jailbreaking for Large Language Models: A Representation Engineering Perspective [43.94115802328438]
  Recent surge in jailbreaking attacks has revealed significant vulnerabilities in Large Language Models (LLMs) when exposed to malicious inputs. We suggest that the self-safeguarding capability of LLMs is linked to specific activity patterns within their representation space. Our findings demonstrate that these patterns can be detected with just a few pairs of contrastive queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-12T00:50:04Z)
• Benchmarking and Defending Against Indirect Prompt Injection Attacks on Large Language Models [79.0183835295533]
  We introduce the first benchmark for indirect prompt injection attacks, named BIPIA, to assess the risk of such vulnerabilities. Our analysis identifies two key factors contributing to their success: LLMs' inability to distinguish between informational context and actionable instructions, and their lack of awareness in avoiding the execution of instructions within external content. We propose two novel defense mechanisms-boundary awareness and explicit reminder-to address these vulnerabilities in both black-box and white-box settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-21T01:08:39Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.