Retrospective Learning from Interactions

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.13852v2
• Date: Tue, 20 May 2025 23:19:28 GMT
• Title: Retrospective Learning from Interactions
• Authors: Zizhao Chen, Mustafa Omer Gul, Yiwei Chen, Gloria Geng, Anne Wu, Yoav Artzi,
• Abstract summary: We introduce ReSpect, a method to learn from such signals in past interactions via retrospection without additional annotations.<n>We show how ReSpect gradually improves task completion rate from 31% to 82%, all without any external annotation.
• Score: 18.5871047885934
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Multi-turn interactions between large language models (LLMs) and users naturally include implicit feedback signals. If an LLM responds in an unexpected way to an instruction, the user is likely to signal it by rephrasing the request, expressing frustration, or pivoting to an alternative task. Such signals are task-independent and occupy a relatively constrained subspace of language, allowing the LLM to identify them even if it fails on the actual task. We introduce ReSpect, a method to learn from such signals in past interactions via retrospection without additional annotations. We deploy ReSpect in a new multimodal interaction scenario, where humans instruct a multimodal LLM to solve an abstract reasoning task with a combinatorial solution space. Through thousands of interactions with humans, we show how ReSpect gradually improves task completion rate from 31% to 82%, all without any external annotation.

Related papers

• Intent Mismatch Causes LLMs to Get Lost in Multi-Turn Conversation [26.91734024759386]
  We argue that the root cause lies in an intent alignment gap rather than intrinsic capability deficits.<n>We propose to decouple intent understanding from task execution through a Mediator-Assistant architecture.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-07T03:41:04Z)
• ClarifyMT-Bench: Benchmarking and Improving Multi-Turn Clarification for Conversational Large Language Models [32.099137908375546]
  ClarifyMT-Bench is a benchmark for multi-turn clarification in large language models (LLMs)<n>We construct 6,120 multi-turn dialogues capturing diverse ambiguity sources and interaction patterns.<n>We propose textbfClarifyAgent, an agentic approach that decomposes clarification into perception, forecasting, tracking, and planning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-24T11:39:00Z)
• Consistently Simulating Human Personas with Multi-Turn Reinforcement Learning [52.07170679746533]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used to simulate human users in interactive settings such as therapy, education, and social role-play.<n>We introduce a unified framework for evaluating and improving persona consistency in LLM-generated dialogue.<n>We define three automatic metrics: prompt-to-line consistency, line-to-line consistency, and Q&A consistency, that capture different types of persona drift and validate each against human annotations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-31T19:40:41Z)
• LLMs Get Lost In Multi-Turn Conversation [44.26588510453331]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are conversational interfaces.<n>LLMs have the potential to assist their users not only when they can fully specify the task at hand, but also to help them define, explore, and refine what they need through multi-turn conversational exchange.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-09T15:21:44Z)
• If an LLM Were a Character, Would It Know Its Own Story? Evaluating Lifelong Learning in LLMs [55.8331366739144]
  We introduce LIFESTATE-BENCH, a benchmark designed to assess lifelong learning in large language models (LLMs) Our fact checking evaluation probes models' self-awareness, episodic memory retrieval, and relationship tracking, across both parametric and non-parametric approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-30T16:50:57Z)
• Scaling Autonomous Agents via Automatic Reward Modeling And Planning [52.39395405893965]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across a range of tasks.<n>However, they still struggle with problems requiring multi-step decision-making and environmental feedback.<n>We propose a framework that can automatically learn a reward model from the environment without human annotations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T18:49:25Z)
• Online Intrinsic Rewards for Decision Making Agents from Large Language Model Feedback [52.763620660061115]
  ONI is a distributed architecture that simultaneously learns an RL policy and an intrinsic reward function.<n>We explore a range of algorithmic choices for reward modeling with varying complexity.<n>Our approach achieves state-of-the-art performance across a range of challenging tasks from the NetHack Learning Environment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-30T13:52:43Z)
• Beyond the Turn-Based Game: Enabling Real-Time Conversations with Duplex Models [66.24055500785657]
  Traditional turn-based chat systems prevent users from verbally interacting with system while it is generating responses. To overcome these limitations, we adapt existing LLMs to listen users while generating output and provide users with instant feedback. We build a dataset consisting of alternating time slices of queries and responses as well as covering typical feedback types in instantaneous interactions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-22T03:20:10Z)
• Item-Language Model for Conversational Recommendation [10.256524103913666]
  We propose an Item-Language Model (ILM) to produce text-aligned item representations that encode user interaction signals. We conduct extensive experiments which demonstrate both the importance of the language-alignment and of user interaction knowledge in the item encoder.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-05T01:35:50Z)
• Are you still on track!? Catching LLM Task Drift with Activations [55.75645403965326]
  Task drift allows attackers to exfiltrate data or influence the LLM's output for other users. We show that a simple linear classifier can detect drift with near-perfect ROC AUC on an out-of-distribution test set. We observe that this approach generalizes surprisingly well to unseen task domains, such as prompt injections, jailbreaks, and malicious instructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-02T16:53:21Z)
• ReST meets ReAct: Self-Improvement for Multi-Step Reasoning LLM Agent [50.508669199496474]
  We develop a ReAct-style LLM agent with the ability to reason and act upon external knowledge. We refine the agent through a ReST-like method that iteratively trains on previous trajectories. Starting from a prompted large model and after just two iterations of the algorithm, we can produce a fine-tuned small model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-15T18:20:15Z)
• LMRL Gym: Benchmarks for Multi-Turn Reinforcement Learning with Language Models [56.25156596019168]
  This paper introduces the LMRL-Gym benchmark for evaluating multi-turn RL for large language models (LLMs) Our benchmark consists of 8 different language tasks, which require multiple rounds of language interaction and cover a range of tasks in open-ended dialogue and text games.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-30T03:59:31Z)
• ML-LMCL: Mutual Learning and Large-Margin Contrastive Learning for Improving ASR Robustness in Spoken Language Understanding [55.39105863825107]
  We propose Mutual Learning and Large-Margin Contrastive Learning (ML-LMCL) to improve automatic speech recognition (ASR) robustness. In fine-tuning, we apply mutual learning and train two SLU models on the manual transcripts and the ASR transcripts, respectively. Experiments on three datasets show that ML-LMCL outperforms existing models and achieves new state-of-the-art performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-19T16:53:35Z)
• Zero-Shot Goal-Directed Dialogue via RL on Imagined Conversations [70.7884839812069]
  Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful and general solutions to many natural language tasks. However, many of the most important applications of language generation are interactive, where an agent has to talk to a person to reach a desired outcome. In this work, we explore a new method for adapting LLMs with RL for such goal-directed dialogue.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-09T18:45:16Z)
• Large Language Model (LLM) as a System of Multiple Expert Agents: An Approach to solve the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus (ARC) Challenge [20.802440121949072]
  We attempt to solve the Abstraction and Reasoning Corpus (ARC) Challenge using Large Language Models (LLMs) We convert the input image into multiple suitable text-based abstraction spaces. We then utilise the associative power of LLMs to derive the input-output relationship.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-08T12:37:28Z)
• Enabling Intelligent Interactions between an Agent and an LLM: A Reinforcement Learning Approach [31.6589518077397]
  Large language models (LLMs) encode a vast amount of world knowledge acquired from massive text datasets. LLMs can assist an embodied agent in solving complex sequential decision making tasks by providing high-level instructions. We propose When2Ask, a reinforcement learning based approach that learns when it is necessary to query LLMs for high-level instructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-06T11:49:09Z)
• Check Your Facts and Try Again: Improving Large Language Models with External Knowledge and Automated Feedback [127.75419038610455]
  Large language models (LLMs) are able to generate human-like, fluent responses for many downstream tasks. This paper proposes a LLM-Augmenter system, which augments a black-box LLM with a set of plug-and-play modules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-24T18:48:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.