Intent Mismatch Causes LLMs to Get Lost in Multi-Turn Conversation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2602.07338v1
• Date: Sat, 07 Feb 2026 03:41:04 GMT
• Title: Intent Mismatch Causes LLMs to Get Lost in Multi-Turn Conversation
• Authors: Geng Liu, Fei Zhu, Rong Feng, Changyi Ma, Shiqi Wang, Gaofeng Meng,
• Abstract summary: We argue that the root cause lies in an intent alignment gap rather than intrinsic capability deficits.<n>We propose to decouple intent understanding from task execution through a Mediator-Assistant architecture.
• Score: 26.91734024759386
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Multi-turn conversation has emerged as a predominant interaction paradigm for Large Language Models (LLMs). Users often employ follow-up questions to refine their intent, expecting LLMs to adapt dynamically. However, recent research reveals that LLMs suffer a substantial performance drop in multi-turn settings compared to single-turn interactions with fully specified instructions, a phenomenon termed ``Lost in Conversation'' (LiC). While this prior work attributes LiC to model unreliability, we argue that the root cause lies in an intent alignment gap rather than intrinsic capability deficits. In this paper, we first demonstrate that LiC is not a failure of model capability but rather a breakdown in interaction between users and LLMs. We theoretically show that scaling model size or improving training alone cannot resolve this gap, as it arises from structural ambiguity in conversational context rather than representational limitations. To address this, we propose to decouple intent understanding from task execution through a Mediator-Assistant architecture. By utilizing an experience-driven Mediator to explicate user inputs into explicit, well-structured instructions based on historical interaction patterns, our approach effectively bridges the gap between vague user intent and model interpretation. Experimental results demonstrate that this method significantly mitigates performance degradation in multi-turn conversations across diverse LLMs.

Related papers

• ClarifyMT-Bench: Benchmarking and Improving Multi-Turn Clarification for Conversational Large Language Models [32.099137908375546]
  ClarifyMT-Bench is a benchmark for multi-turn clarification in large language models (LLMs)<n>We construct 6,120 multi-turn dialogues capturing diverse ambiguity sources and interaction patterns.<n>We propose textbfClarifyAgent, an agentic approach that decomposes clarification into perception, forecasting, tracking, and planning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-12-24T11:39:00Z)
• A Comprehensive Study on Visual Token Redundancy for Discrete Diffusion-based Multimodal Large Language Models [85.30893355216486]
  We study how visual token redundancy evolves with different dMLLM architectures and tasks.<n>Our study reveals that visual redundancy emerges only in from-scratch dMLLMs while handling long-answer tasks.<n>Layer-skipping is promising for accelerating AR-to-diffusion dMLLMs, whereas progressive or late-step pruning is more effective for from-scratch dMLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-19T04:13:36Z)
• Teaming LLMs to Detect and Mitigate Hallucinations [0.0]
  We show that extending single-model consistency methods can result in substantial further improvements in hallucination detection and mitigation capabilities.<n>We evaluate this "consortium consistency" approach across many model teams from a pool of 15 model teams.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-22T12:03:43Z)
• Explaining multimodal LLMs via intra-modal token interactions [55.27436637894534]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have achieved remarkable success across diverse vision-language tasks, yet their internal decision-making mechanisms remain insufficiently understood.<n>We propose enhancing interpretability by leveraging intra-modal interaction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-26T14:39:13Z)
• The Inherent Limits of Pretrained LLMs: The Unexpected Convergence of Instruction Tuning and In-Context Learning Capabilities [51.594836904623534]
  We investigate whether instruction-tuned models possess fundamentally different capabilities from base models that are prompted using in-context examples.<n>We show that the performance of instruction-tuned models is significantly correlated with the in-context performance of their base counterparts.<n>Specifically, we extend this understanding to instruction-tuned models, suggesting that their pretraining data similarly sets a limiting boundary on the tasks they can solve.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-15T10:57:55Z)
• RA-BLIP: Multimodal Adaptive Retrieval-Augmented Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training [55.54020926284334]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have recently received substantial interest, which shows their emerging potential as general-purpose models for various vision-language tasks. Retrieval augmentation techniques have proven to be effective plugins for both LLMs and MLLMs. In this study, we propose multimodal adaptive Retrieval-Augmented Bootstrapping Language-Image Pre-training (RA-BLIP), a novel retrieval-augmented framework for various MLLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-18T03:45:19Z)
• The Strong Pull of Prior Knowledge in Large Language Models and Its Impact on Emotion Recognition [74.04775677110179]
  In-context Learning (ICL) has emerged as a powerful paradigm for performing natural language tasks with Large Language Models (LLM) We show that LLMs have strong yet inconsistent priors in emotion recognition that ossify their predictions. Our results suggest that caution is needed when using ICL with larger LLMs for affect-centered tasks outside their pre-training domain.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-25T19:07:32Z)
• Causal Prompting: Debiasing Large Language Model Prompting based on Front-Door Adjustment [32.12998469814097]
  A novel causal prompting method based on front-door adjustment is proposed to effectively mitigate Large Language Models (LLMs) biases.<n> Experimental results show that the proposed causal prompting approach achieves excellent performance across seven natural language processing datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T07:47:34Z)
• Learning to Reduce: Optimal Representations of Structured Data in Prompting Large Language Models [42.16047343029512]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have been widely used as general-purpose AI agents. We propose a framework, Learning to Reduce, that fine-tunes a language model to generate a reduced version of an input context. We show that our model achieves comparable accuracies in selecting the relevant evidence from an input context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-22T00:41:23Z)
• Zero-Shot Goal-Directed Dialogue via RL on Imagined Conversations [70.7884839812069]
  Large language models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful and general solutions to many natural language tasks. However, many of the most important applications of language generation are interactive, where an agent has to talk to a person to reach a desired outcome. In this work, we explore a new method for adapting LLMs with RL for such goal-directed dialogue.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-09T18:45:16Z)
• ReEval: Automatic Hallucination Evaluation for Retrieval-Augmented Large Language Models via Transferable Adversarial Attacks [91.55895047448249]
  This paper presents ReEval, an LLM-based framework using prompt chaining to perturb the original evidence for generating new test cases. We implement ReEval using ChatGPT and evaluate the resulting variants of two popular open-domain QA datasets. Our generated data is human-readable and useful to trigger hallucination in large language models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T06:37:32Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.