On the Learn-to-Optimize Capabilities of Transformers in In-Context Sparse Recovery

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.13981v1
• Date: Thu, 17 Oct 2024 19:18:28 GMT
• Title: On the Learn-to-Optimize Capabilities of Transformers in In-Context Sparse Recovery
• Authors: Renpu Liu, Ruida Zhou, Cong Shen, Jing Yang,
• Abstract summary: We show that a K-layer Transformer can perform an L2O algorithm with a provable convergence rate linear in K. Unlike the conventional L2O algorithms that require the measurement matrix involved in training to match that in testing, the trained Transformer is able to solve sparse recovery problems generated with different measurement matrices.
• Score: 15.164710897163099
• License:
• Abstract: An intriguing property of the Transformer is its ability to perform in-context learning (ICL), where the Transformer can solve different inference tasks without parameter updating based on the contextual information provided by the corresponding input-output demonstration pairs. It has been theoretically proved that ICL is enabled by the capability of Transformers to perform gradient-descent algorithms (Von Oswald et al., 2023a; Bai et al., 2024). This work takes a step further and shows that Transformers can perform learning-to-optimize (L2O) algorithms. Specifically, for the ICL sparse recovery (formulated as LASSO) tasks, we show that a K-layer Transformer can perform an L2O algorithm with a provable convergence rate linear in K. This provides a new perspective explaining the superior ICL capability of Transformers, even with only a few layers, which cannot be achieved by the standard gradient-descent algorithms. Moreover, unlike the conventional L2O algorithms that require the measurement matrix involved in training to match that in testing, the trained Transformer is able to solve sparse recovery problems generated with different measurement matrices. Besides, Transformers as an L2O algorithm can leverage structural information embedded in the training tasks to accelerate its convergence during ICL, and generalize across different lengths of demonstration pairs, where conventional L2O algorithms typically struggle or fail. Such theoretical findings are supported by our experimental results.

Related papers

• Interpreting Affine Recurrence Learning in GPT-style Transformers [54.01174470722201]
  In-context learning allows GPT-style transformers to generalize during inference without modifying their weights. This paper focuses specifically on their ability to learn and predict affine recurrences as an ICL task. We analyze the model's internal operations using both empirical and theoretical approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T21:30:01Z)
• How Do Nonlinear Transformers Learn and Generalize in In-Context Learning? [82.51626700527837]
  Transformer-based large language models displayed impressive in-context learning capabilities, where a pre-trained model can handle new tasks without fine-tuning. We analyze how the mechanics of how Transformer to achieve ICL contribute to the technical challenges of the training problems in Transformers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-23T21:07:20Z)
• On the Expressive Power of a Variant of the Looped Transformer [83.30272757948829]
  We design a novel transformer block, dubbed AlgoFormer, to empower transformers with algorithmic capabilities. The proposed AlgoFormer can achieve significantly higher in algorithm representation when using the same number of parameters. Some theoretical and empirical results are presented to show that the designed transformer has the potential to be smarter than human-designed algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T07:07:54Z)
• How Do Transformers Learn In-Context Beyond Simple Functions? A Case Study on Learning with Representations [98.7450564309923]
  This paper takes initial steps on understanding in-context learning (ICL) in more complex scenarios, by studying learning with representations. We construct synthetic in-context learning problems with a compositional structure, where the label depends on the input through a possibly complex but fixed representation function. We show theoretically the existence of transformers that approximately implement such algorithms with mild depth and size.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-16T17:40:49Z)
• Transformers as Decision Makers: Provable In-Context Reinforcement Learning via Supervised Pretraining [25.669038513039357]
  This paper provides a theoretical framework that analyzes supervised pretraining for in-context reinforcement learning. We show transformers with ReLU attention can efficiently approximate near-optimal online reinforcement learning algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-12T17:55:02Z)
• Transformers as Statisticians: Provable In-Context Learning with In-Context Algorithm Selection [88.23337313766353]
  This work first provides a comprehensive statistical theory for transformers to perform ICL. We show that transformers can implement a broad class of standard machine learning algorithms in context. A emphsingle transformer can adaptively select different base ICL algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-07T17:59:31Z)
• Transformers as Algorithms: Generalization and Implicit Model Selection in In-context Learning [23.677503557659705]
  In-context learning (ICL) is a type of prompting where a transformer model operates on a sequence of examples and performs inference on-the-fly. We treat the transformer model as a learning algorithm that can be specialized via training to implement-at inference-time-another target algorithm. We show that transformers can act as an adaptive learning algorithm and perform model selection across different hypothesis classes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-17T18:31:12Z)
• Exploiting Transformer in Sparse Reward Reinforcement Learning for Interpretable Temporal Logic Motion Planning [9.801466218905604]
  Automaton based algorithms rely on the manually customized representation of states for the considered task. We develop a Double-Transformer-guided Temporal Logic framework (T2TL) that exploits the structural feature of Transformer twice. As a semantics, progression is exploited to decompose the complex task into learnable sub-goals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-27T07:41:11Z)
• Learning Bounded Context-Free-Grammar via LSTM and the Transformer:Difference and Explanations [51.77000472945441]
  Long Short-Term Memory (LSTM) and Transformers are two popular neural architectures used for natural language processing tasks. In practice, it is often observed that Transformer models have better representation power than LSTM. We study such practical differences between LSTM and Transformer and propose an explanation based on their latent space decomposition patterns.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-16T19:56:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.