A Lightweight Multi Aspect Controlled Text Generation Solution For Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.14144v1
• Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 03:32:00 GMT
• Title: A Lightweight Multi Aspect Controlled Text Generation Solution For Large Language Models
• Authors: Chenyang Zhang, Jiayi Lin, Haibo Tong, Bingxuan Hou, Dongyu Zhang, Jialin Li, Junli Wang,
• Abstract summary: Large language models (LLMs) show remarkable abilities with instruction tuning. They fail to achieve ideal tasks when lacking high-quality instruction tuning data on target tasks.
• Score: 12.572046828830699
• License:
• Abstract: Large language models (LLMs) show remarkable abilities with instruction tuning. However, they fail to achieve ideal tasks when lacking high-quality instruction tuning data on target tasks. Multi-Aspect Controllable Text Generation (MCTG) is a representative task for this dilemma, where aspect datasets are usually biased and correlated. Existing work exploits additional model structures and strategies for solutions, limiting adaptability to LLMs. To activate MCTG ability of LLMs, we propose a lightweight MCTG pipeline based on data augmentation. We analyze bias and correlations in traditional datasets, and address these concerns with augmented control attributes and sentences. Augmented datasets are feasible for instruction tuning. In our experiments, LLMs perform better in MCTG after data augmentation, with a 20% accuracy rise and less aspect correlations.

Related papers

• Fine-Tuning Language Models on Multiple Datasets for Citation Intention Classification [17.03832781104098]
  Citation intention Classification (CIC) tools classify citations by their intention. Prior research has shown that pretrained language models (PLMs) can achieve state-of-the-art performance on CIC benchmarks. We propose a multi-task learning framework that jointly fine-tunes PLMs on a dataset of primary interest together with multiple auxiliary CIC datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-17T08:45:02Z)
• A Framework for Fine-Tuning LLMs using Heterogeneous Feedback [69.51729152929413]
  We present a framework for fine-tuning large language models (LLMs) using heterogeneous feedback. First, we combine the heterogeneous feedback data into a single supervision format, compatible with methods like SFT and RLHF. Next, given this unified feedback dataset, we extract a high-quality and diverse subset to obtain performance increases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-05T23:20:32Z)
• SELF-GUIDE: Better Task-Specific Instruction Following via Self-Synthetic Finetuning [70.21358720599821]
  Large language models (LLMs) hold the promise of solving diverse tasks when provided with appropriate natural language prompts. We propose SELF-GUIDE, a multi-stage mechanism in which we synthesize task-specific input-output pairs from the student LLM. We report an absolute improvement of approximately 15% for classification tasks and 18% for generation tasks in the benchmark's metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-16T04:41:58Z)
• DARG: Dynamic Evaluation of Large Language Models via Adaptive Reasoning Graph [70.79413606968814]
  We introduce Dynamic Evaluation of LLMs via Adaptive Reasoning Graph Evolvement (DARG) to dynamically extend current benchmarks with controlled complexity and diversity. Specifically, we first extract the reasoning graphs of data points in current benchmarks and then perturb the reasoning graphs to generate novel testing data. Such newly generated test samples can have different levels of complexity while maintaining linguistic diversity similar to the original benchmarks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-25T04:27:53Z)
• An Empirical Study of Data Ability Boundary in LLMs' Math Reasoning [13.11991777772918]
  Large language models (LLMs) are displaying emergent abilities for math reasoning tasks. In this paper, we aim to explore a general data strategy for supervised data to help optimize and expand math reasoning ability.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-23T17:38:43Z)
• Learning to Reduce: Optimal Representations of Structured Data in Prompting Large Language Models [42.16047343029512]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have been widely used as general-purpose AI agents. We propose a framework, Learning to Reduce, that fine-tunes a language model to generate a reduced version of an input context. We show that our model achieves comparable accuracies in selecting the relevant evidence from an input context.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-22T00:41:23Z)
• LESS: Selecting Influential Data for Targeted Instruction Tuning [64.78894228923619]
  We propose LESS, an efficient algorithm to estimate data influences and perform Low-rank gradiEnt Similarity Search for instruction data selection. We show that training on a LESS-selected 5% of the data can often outperform training on the full dataset across diverse downstream tasks. Our method goes beyond surface form cues to identify data that the necessary reasoning skills for the intended downstream application.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T19:18:04Z)
• Curated LLM: Synergy of LLMs and Data Curation for tabular augmentation in low-data regimes [57.62036621319563]
  We introduce CLLM, which leverages the prior knowledge of Large Language Models (LLMs) for data augmentation in the low-data regime. We demonstrate the superior performance of CLLM in the low-data regime compared to conventional generators.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-19T12:34:46Z)
• Scaling Relationship on Learning Mathematical Reasoning with Large Language Models [75.29595679428105]
  We investigate how the pre-training loss, supervised data amount, and augmented data amount influence the reasoning performances of a supervised LLM. We find that rejection samples from multiple models push LLaMA-7B to an accuracy of 49.3% on GSM8K which outperforms the supervised fine-tuning (SFT) accuracy of 35.9% significantly.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-03T15:34:01Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.