Are AI Detectors Good Enough? A Survey on Quality of Datasets With Machine-Generated Texts

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.14677v1
• Date: Fri, 18 Oct 2024 17:59:57 GMT
• Title: Are AI Detectors Good Enough? A Survey on Quality of Datasets With Machine-Generated Texts
• Authors: German Gritsai, Anastasia Voznyuk, Andrey Grabovoy, Yury Chekhovich,
• Abstract summary: A huge number of detectors and collections with AI fragments have emerged, and several detection methods even showed recognition quality up to 99.9%. Are detectors actually highly trustworthy or do their high benchmark scores come from the poor quality of evaluation datasets? We present a systematic review of datasets from competitions dedicated to AI-generated content detection and propose methods for evaluating the quality of datasets containing AI-generated fragments.
• Score: 0.0
• License:
• Abstract: The rapid development of autoregressive Large Language Models (LLMs) has significantly improved the quality of generated texts, necessitating reliable machine-generated text detectors. A huge number of detectors and collections with AI fragments have emerged, and several detection methods even showed recognition quality up to 99.9% according to the target metrics in such collections. However, the quality of such detectors tends to drop dramatically in the wild, posing a question: Are detectors actually highly trustworthy or do their high benchmark scores come from the poor quality of evaluation datasets? In this paper, we emphasise the need for robust and qualitative methods for evaluating generated data to be secure against bias and low generalising ability of future model. We present a systematic review of datasets from competitions dedicated to AI-generated content detection and propose methods for evaluating the quality of datasets containing AI-generated fragments. In addition, we discuss the possibility of using high-quality generated data to achieve two goals: improving the training of detection models and improving the training datasets themselves. Our contribution aims to facilitate a better understanding of the dynamics between human and machine text, which will ultimately support the integrity of information in an increasingly automated world.

Related papers

• SONAR: A Synthetic AI-Audio Detection Framework and Benchmark [59.09338266364506]
  SONAR is a synthetic AI-Audio Detection Framework and Benchmark. It aims to provide a comprehensive evaluation for distinguishing cutting-edge AI-synthesized auditory content. It is the first framework to uniformly benchmark AI-audio detection across both traditional and foundation model-based deepfake detection systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-06T01:03:42Z)
• Q-Ground: Image Quality Grounding with Large Multi-modality Models [61.72022069880346]
  We introduce Q-Ground, the first framework aimed at tackling fine-scale visual quality grounding. Q-Ground combines large multi-modality models with detailed visual quality analysis. Central to our contribution is the introduction of the QGround-100K dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-24T06:42:46Z)
• Improving Interpretability and Robustness for the Detection of AI-Generated Images [6.116075037154215]
  We analyze existing state-of-the-art AIGI detection methods based on frozen CLIP embeddings. We show how to interpret them, shedding light on how images produced by various AI generators differ from real ones.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-21T10:33:09Z)
• AI-Driven Frameworks for Enhancing Data Quality in Big Data Ecosystems: Error_Detection, Correction, and Metadata Integration [0.0]
  This thesis proposes a novel set of interconnected frameworks aimed at enhancing big data quality comprehensively. Firstly, we introduce new quality metrics and a weighted scoring system for precise data quality assessment. Thirdly, we present a generic framework for detecting various quality anomalies using AI models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-06T21:36:45Z)
• Data Readiness for AI: A 360-Degree Survey [0.9343816282846432]
  Poor quality data produces inaccurate and ineffective AI models. Numerous R&D efforts have been spent on improving data quality. We propose a taxonomy of data readiness for AI (DRAI) metrics for structured and unstructured datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-08T15:19:57Z)
• Exploring Precision and Recall to assess the quality and diversity of LLMs [82.21278402856079]
  We introduce a novel evaluation framework for Large Language Models (LLMs) such as textscLlama-2 and textscMistral. This approach allows for a nuanced assessment of the quality and diversity of generated text without the need for aligned corpora.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-16T13:53:26Z)
• AART: AI-Assisted Red-Teaming with Diverse Data Generation for New LLM-powered Applications [5.465142671132731]
  Adversarial testing of large language models (LLMs) is crucial for their safe and responsible deployment. We introduce a novel approach for automated generation of adversarial evaluation datasets to test the safety of LLM generations on new downstream applications. We call it AI-assisted Red-Teaming (AART) - an automated alternative to current manual red-teaming efforts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-14T23:28:23Z)
• On Responsible Machine Learning Datasets with Fairness, Privacy, and Regulatory Norms [56.119374302685934]
  There have been severe concerns over the trustworthiness of AI technologies. Machine and deep learning algorithms depend heavily on the data used during their development. We propose a framework to evaluate the datasets through a responsible rubric.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-24T14:01:53Z)
• On the Possibilities of AI-Generated Text Detection [76.55825911221434]
  We argue that as machine-generated text approximates human-like quality, the sample size needed for detection bounds increases. We test various state-of-the-art text generators, including GPT-2, GPT-3.5-Turbo, Llama, Llama-2-13B-Chat-HF, and Llama-2-70B-Chat-HF, against detectors, including oBERTa-Large/Base-Detector, GPTZero.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-10T17:47:39Z)
• DAGA: Data Augmentation with a Generation Approach for Low-resource Tagging Tasks [88.62288327934499]
  We propose a novel augmentation method with language models trained on the linearized labeled sentences. Our method is applicable to both supervised and semi-supervised settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-03T07:49:15Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.