SemiHVision: Enhancing Medical Multimodal Models with a Semi-Human Annotated Dataset and Fine-Tuned Instruction Generation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.14948v1
• Date: Sat, 19 Oct 2024 02:35:35 GMT
• Title: SemiHVision: Enhancing Medical Multimodal Models with a Semi-Human Annotated Dataset and Fine-Tuned Instruction Generation
• Authors: Junda Wang, Yujan Ting, Eric Z. Chen, Hieu Tran, Hong Yu, Weijing Huang, Terrence Chen,
• Abstract summary: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have made significant strides, yet they face challenges in the medical domain due to limited specialized knowledge. We seek to address this gap at various stages of the end-to-end learning pipeline, including data collection, model fine-tuning, and evaluation.
• Score: 13.672776832197918
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have made significant strides, yet they face challenges in the medical domain due to limited specialized knowledge. While recent medical MLLMs demonstrate strong performance in lab settings, they often struggle in real-world applications, highlighting a substantial gap between research and practice. In this paper, we seek to address this gap at various stages of the end-to-end learning pipeline, including data collection, model fine-tuning, and evaluation. At the data collection stage, we introduce SemiHVision, a dataset that combines human annotations with automated augmentation techniques to improve both medical knowledge representation and diagnostic reasoning. For model fine-tuning, we trained PMC-Cambrian-8B-AN over 2400 H100 GPU hours, resulting in performance that surpasses public medical models like HuatuoGPT-Vision-34B (79.0% vs. 66.7%) and private general models like Claude3-Opus (55.7%) on traditional benchmarks such as SLAKE and VQA-RAD. In the evaluation phase, we observed that traditional benchmarks cannot accurately reflect realistic clinical task capabilities. To overcome this limitation and provide more targeted guidance for model evaluation, we introduce the JAMA Clinical Challenge, a novel benchmark specifically designed to evaluate diagnostic reasoning. On this benchmark, PMC-Cambrian-AN achieves state-of-the-art performance with a GPT-4 score of 1.29, significantly outperforming HuatuoGPT-Vision-34B (1.13) and Claude3-Opus (1.17), demonstrating its superior diagnostic reasoning abilities.

Related papers

• DermoGPT: Open Weights and Open Data for Morphology-Grounded Dermatological Reasoning MLLMs [54.8829900010621]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) show promise for medical applications, yet progress in dermatology lags due to limited training data, narrow task coverage, and lack of clinically-grounded supervision.<n>We present a comprehensive framework to address these gaps.<n>First, we introduce DermoInstruct, a large-scale morphology-anchored instruction corpus comprising 211,243 images and 772,675 trajectories across five task formats.<n>Second, we establish DermoBench, a rigorous benchmark evaluating 11 tasks across four clinical axes: Morphology, Diagnosis, Reasoning, and Fairness, including a challenging subset of 3,600
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-01-05T07:55:36Z)
• 47B Mixture-of-Experts Beats 671B Dense Models on Chinese Medical Examinations [10.072653135781207]
  This paper presents a benchmark evaluation of 27 large language models (LLMs) on Chinese medical examination questions.<n>Our analysis reveals substantial performance variations among models, with Mixtral-8x7B achieving the highest overall accuracy of 74.25%.<n>The evaluation demonstrates significant performance gaps between medical specialties, with models generally performing better on cardiovascular and neurology questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-11-16T06:08:41Z)
• TemMed-Bench: Evaluating Temporal Medical Image Reasoning in Vision-Language Models [54.48710348910535]
  Existing medical reasoning benchmarks primarily focus on analyzing a patient's condition based on an image from a single visit.<n>We introduce TemMed-Bench, the first benchmark designed for analyzing changes in patients' conditions between different clinical visits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-29T17:51:26Z)
• Med-RewardBench: Benchmarking Reward Models and Judges for Medical Multimodal Large Language Models [57.73472878679636]
  We introduce Med-RewardBench, the first benchmark specifically designed to evaluate medical reward models and judges.<n>Med-RewardBench features a multimodal dataset spanning 13 organ systems and 8 clinical departments, with 1,026 expert-annotated cases.<n>A rigorous three-step process ensures high-quality evaluation data across six clinically critical dimensions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-29T08:58:39Z)
• DermINO: Hybrid Pretraining for a Versatile Dermatology Foundation Model [92.66916452260553]
  DermNIO is a versatile foundation model for dermatology.<n>It incorporates a novel hybrid pretraining framework that augments the self-supervised learning paradigm.<n>It consistently outperforms state-of-the-art models across a wide range of tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-08-17T00:41:39Z)
• MedGemma Technical Report [75.88152277443179]
  We introduce MedGemma, a collection of medical vision-language foundation models based on Gemma 3 4B and 27B.<n>MedGemma demonstrates advanced medical understanding and reasoning on images and text.<n>We additionally introduce MedSigLIP, a medically-tuned vision encoder derived from SigLIP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-07T17:01:44Z)
• InfiMed: Low-Resource Medical MLLMs with Advancing Understanding and Reasoning [19.791150694039466]
  We introduce our InfiMed-Series models, InfiMed-SFT-3B and InfiMed-RL-3B, both of which deliver state-of-the-art performance across seven multimodal medical benchmarks.<n>InfiMed-RL-3B achieves an average accuracy of 59.2%, outperforming even larger models like InternVL3-8B, which achieves 57.3%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T10:31:57Z)
• The Limited Impact of Medical Adaptation of Large Language and Vision-Language Models [42.13371892174481]
  We compare ten public "medical" large language models (LLMs) and two vision-language models (VLMs) All medical VLMs and nearly all medical LLMs fail to consistently improve over their base models in the zero-/few-shot prompting and supervised fine-tuning regimes. Our findings suggest that state-of-the-art general-domain models may already exhibit strong medical knowledge and reasoning capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-13T18:50:13Z)
• Medical Adaptation of Large Language and Vision-Language Models: Are We Making Progress? [44.265524592991945]
  We show that medical models fail to consistently improve over their base models in the zero-/few-shot prompting regime for medical question-answering tasks. Our findings suggest that state-of-the-art general-domain models may already exhibit strong medical knowledge and reasoning capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-06T18:51:02Z)
• PaPaGei: Open Foundation Models for Optical Physiological Signals [8.78925327256804]
  Photoplethysmography is the leading non-invasive technique for monitoring biosignals and cardiovascular health. Machine learning models trained on PPG signals tend to be task-specific and struggle with generalization. We present PaPaGei, the first open foundation model for PPG signals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-27T18:18:06Z)
• Adapting LLMs for the Medical Domain in Portuguese: A Study on Fine-Tuning and Model Evaluation [1.922611370494431]
  This study evaluates the performance of large language models (LLMs) as medical agents in Portuguese. The InternLM2 model, with initial training on medical data, presented the best overall performance. DrBode models, derived from ChatBode, exhibited a phenomenon of catastrophic forgetting of acquired medical knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-30T19:10:03Z)
• GMAI-MMBench: A Comprehensive Multimodal Evaluation Benchmark Towards General Medical AI [67.09501109871351]
  Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) are capable of handling diverse data types such as imaging, text, and physiological signals. GMAI-MMBench is the most comprehensive general medical AI benchmark with well-categorized data structure and multi-perceptual granularity to date. It is constructed from 284 datasets across 38 medical image modalities, 18 clinical-related tasks, 18 departments, and 4 perceptual granularities in a Visual Question Answering (VQA) format.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-06T17:59:21Z)
• Specialized curricula for training vision-language models in retinal image analysis [8.167708226285932]
  Vision-language models (VLMs) automatically interpret images and summarize their findings as text. In this work, we demonstrate that OpenAI's ChatGPT-4o model markedly underperforms compared to practicing ophthalmologists on specialist tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-11T11:31:48Z)
• Potential of Multimodal Large Language Models for Data Mining of Medical Images and Free-text Reports [51.45762396192655]
  Multimodal large language models (MLLMs) have recently transformed many domains, significantly affecting the medical field. Notably, Gemini-Vision-series (Gemini) and GPT-4-series (GPT-4) models have epitomized a paradigm shift in Artificial General Intelligence for computer vision. This study evaluated the performance of the Gemini, GPT-4, and 4 popular large models for an exhaustive evaluation across 14 medical imaging datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-08T09:08:42Z)
• SemioLLM: Assessing Large Language Models for Semiological Analysis in Epilepsy Research [45.2233252981348]
  Large Language Models have shown promising results in their ability to encode general medical knowledge. We test the ability of state-of-the-art LLMs to leverage their internal knowledge and reasoning for epilepsy diagnosis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-03T11:02:12Z)
• Capabilities of Gemini Models in Medicine [100.60391771032887]
  We introduce Med-Gemini, a family of highly capable multimodal models specialized in medicine. We evaluate Med-Gemini on 14 medical benchmarks, establishing new state-of-the-art (SoTA) performance on 10 of them. Our results offer compelling evidence for Med-Gemini's potential, although further rigorous evaluation will be crucial before real-world deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-29T04:11:28Z)
• Towards a clinically accessible radiology foundation model: open-access and lightweight, with automated evaluation [113.5002649181103]
  Training open-source small multimodal models (SMMs) to bridge competency gaps for unmet clinical needs in radiology. For training, we assemble a large dataset of over 697 thousand radiology image-text pairs. For evaluation, we propose CheXprompt, a GPT-4-based metric for factuality evaluation, and demonstrate its parity with expert evaluation. The inference of LlaVA-Rad is fast and can be performed on a single V100 GPU in private settings, offering a promising state-of-the-art tool for real-world clinical applications.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-12T18:12:02Z)
• Advancing COVID-19 Diagnosis with Privacy-Preserving Collaboration in Artificial Intelligence [79.038671794961]
  We launch the Unified CT-COVID AI Diagnostic Initiative (UCADI), where the AI model can be distributedly trained and independently executed at each host institution. Our study is based on 9,573 chest computed tomography scans (CTs) from 3,336 patients collected from 23 hospitals located in China and the UK.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-18T00:43:41Z)
• Predicting Clinical Diagnosis from Patients Electronic Health Records Using BERT-based Neural Networks [62.9447303059342]
  We show the importance of this problem in medical community. We present a modification of Bidirectional Representations from Transformers (BERT) model for classification sequence. We use a large-scale Russian EHR dataset consisting of about 4 million unique patient visits.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-15T09:22:55Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.