A Comprehensive Survey of Direct Preference Optimization: Datasets, Theories, Variants, and Applications

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.15595v2
• Date: Sun, 10 Nov 2024 13:46:15 GMT
• Title: A Comprehensive Survey of Direct Preference Optimization: Datasets, Theories, Variants, and Applications
• Authors: Wenyi Xiao, Zechuan Wang, Leilei Gan, Shuai Zhao, Wanggui He, Luu Anh Tuan, Long Chen, Hao Jiang, Zhou Zhao, Fei Wu,
• Abstract summary: Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has emerged as a promising approach for alignment. Despite DPO's various advancements and inherent limitations, an in-depth review of these aspects is currently lacking in the literature.
• Score: 52.42860559005861
• License:
• Abstract: With the rapid advancement of large language models (LLMs), aligning policy models with human preferences has become increasingly critical. Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has emerged as a promising approach for alignment, acting as an RL-free alternative to Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF). Despite DPO's various advancements and inherent limitations, an in-depth review of these aspects is currently lacking in the literature. In this work, we present a comprehensive review of the challenges and opportunities in DPO, covering theoretical analyses, variants, relevant preference datasets, and applications. Specifically, we categorize recent studies on DPO based on key research questions to provide a thorough understanding of DPO's current landscape. Additionally, we propose several future research directions to offer insights on model alignment for the research community.

Related papers

• The Hitchhiker's Guide to Human Alignment with *PO [43.4130314879284]
  We focus on identifying the algorithm that, while being performant, is simultaneously more robust to varying hyper parameters. Our analysis reveals that the widely adopted DPO method consistently produces lengthy responses of inferior quality. Motivated by these findings, we propose an embarrassingly simple extension to the DPO algorithm, LN-DPO, resulting in more concise responses without sacrificing quality.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-21T17:35:20Z)
• Understanding Reference Policies in Direct Preference Optimization [50.67309013764383]
  Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has become a widely used training method for the instruction fine-tuning of large language models (LLMs) This work explores an under-investigated aspect of DPO - its dependency on the reference model or policy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-18T17:08:10Z)
• New Desiderata for Direct Preference Optimization [19.324743346476417]
  We introduce new evaluation criteria that highlight unresolved shortcomings in the ability of existing DPO methods to interpolate between a pre-trained reference model and empirical measures of human preferences. Our insights motivate an alternative DPO-like loss that provably mitigates these limitations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-12T07:52:32Z)
• Exploratory Preference Optimization: Harnessing Implicit Q*-Approximation for Sample-Efficient RLHF [82.7679132059169]
  Reinforcement learning from human feedback has emerged as a central tool for language model alignment. We propose a new algorithm for online exploration in RLHF, Exploratory Preference Optimization (XPO) XPO enjoys the strongest known provable guarantees and promising empirical performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-31T17:39:06Z)
• Towards Analyzing and Understanding the Limitations of DPO: A Theoretical Perspective [25.34250859820326]
  We provide an analytical framework using the field theory to analyze the optimization process of DPO. We find that the DPO loss function decreases the probability of producing human dispreferred data at a faster rate than it increases the probability of producing preferred data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-06T13:24:37Z)
• Iterative Preference Learning from Human Feedback: Bridging Theory and Practice for RLHF under KL-Constraint [56.74058752955209]
  This paper studies the alignment process of generative models with Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) We first identify the primary challenges of existing popular methods like offline PPO and offline DPO as lacking in strategical exploration of the environment. We propose efficient algorithms with finite-sample theoretical guarantees.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-18T18:58:42Z)
• Statistical Rejection Sampling Improves Preference Optimization [42.57245965632205]
  We introduce a novel approach to source preference data from the target optimal policy using rejection sampling. We also propose a unified framework that enhances the loss functions used in both Sequence Likelihood (SLiC) and Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) from a preference modeling standpoint.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-13T01:07:25Z)
• Secrets of RLHF in Large Language Models Part I: PPO [81.01936993929127]
  Large language models (LLMs) have formulated a blueprint for the advancement of artificial general intelligence. reinforcement learning with human feedback (RLHF) emerges as the pivotal technological paradigm underpinning this pursuit. In this report, we dissect the framework of RLHF, re-evaluate the inner workings of PPO, and explore how the parts comprising PPO algorithms impact policy agent training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-11T01:55:24Z)
• Pessimistic Model Selection for Offline Deep Reinforcement Learning [56.282483586473816]
  Deep Reinforcement Learning (DRL) has demonstrated great potentials in solving sequential decision making problems in many applications. One main barrier is the over-fitting issue that leads to poor generalizability of the policy learned by DRL. We propose a pessimistic model selection (PMS) approach for offline DRL with a theoretical guarantee.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-11-29T06:29:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.