A Two-Stage Learning-to-Defer Approach for Multi-Task Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.15729v3
• Date: Mon, 03 Feb 2025 04:12:17 GMT
• Title: A Two-Stage Learning-to-Defer Approach for Multi-Task Learning
• Authors: Yannis Montreuil, Shu Heng Yeo, Axel Carlier, Lai Xing Ng, Wei Tsang Ooi,
• Abstract summary: We introduce a novel Two-Stage Learning-to-Defer framework for multi-task learning that jointly addresses classification and regression tasks.<n>We validate our framework on two challenging tasks: object detection, where classification and regression are tightly coupled, and electronic health record analysis.
• Score: 3.4289478404209826
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: The Two-Stage Learning-to-Defer framework has been extensively studied for classification and, more recently, regression tasks. However, many contemporary applications involve both classification and regression in an interdependent manner. In this work, we introduce a novel Two-Stage Learning-to-Defer framework for multi-task learning that jointly addresses these tasks. Our approach leverages a two-stage surrogate loss family, which we prove to be both ($\mathcal{G}, \mathcal{R}$)-consistent and Bayes-consistent, providing strong theoretical guarantees of convergence to the Bayes-optimal rejector. We establish consistency bounds explicitly linked to the cross-entropy surrogate family and the $L_1$-norm of the agents' costs, extending the theoretical minimizability gap analysis to the two-stage setting with multiple experts. We validate our framework on two challenging tasks: object detection, where classification and regression are tightly coupled, and existing methods fail, and electronic health record analysis, in which we highlight the suboptimality of current learning-to-defer approaches.

Related papers

• Unlocking the Potential of Difficulty Prior in RL-based Multimodal Reasoning [69.64809103333839]
  We investigate how explicitly modeling problem's difficulty prior information shapes the effectiveness of reinforcement learning based fine-tuning for multimodal reasoning.<n>Our approach demonstrates significant performances across various multi-modal mathematical reasoning benchmarks with only 2K+0.6K two-stage training data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-19T15:43:10Z)
• Adversarial Robustness in Two-Stage Learning-to-Defer: Algorithms and Guarantees [3.6787328174619254]
  Learning-to-Defer (L2D) facilitates optimal task allocation between AI systems and decision-makers. This paper conducts the first comprehensive analysis of adversarial robustness in two-stage L2D frameworks. We propose SARD, a robust, convex, deferral algorithm rooted in Bayes and $(mathcalR,mathcalG)$-consistency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-03T03:44:35Z)
• Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback: Data Coverage and Algorithmic Techniques [65.55451717632317]
  We study Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (MARLHF), exploring both theoretical foundations and empirical validations. We define the task as identifying Nash equilibrium from a preference-only offline dataset in general-sum games. Our findings underscore the multifaceted approach required for MARLHF, paving the way for effective preference-based multi-agent systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-01T13:14:41Z)
• Towards Effective Evaluations and Comparisons for LLM Unlearning Methods [97.2995389188179]
  This paper seeks to refine the evaluation of machine unlearning for large language models. It addresses two key challenges -- the robustness of evaluation metrics and the trade-offs between competing goals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T14:41:00Z)
• Regression with Multi-Expert Deferral [30.389055604165222]
  Learning to defer with multiple experts is a framework where the learner can choose to defer the prediction to several experts. We present a novel framework of regression with deferral, which involves deferring the prediction to multiple experts. We introduce new surrogate loss functions for both scenarios and prove that they are supported by $H$-consistency bounds.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-28T15:26:38Z)
• Multi-Task Learning with Multi-Task Optimization [31.518330903602095]
  We show that a set of optimized yet well-distributed models embody different trade-offs in one algorithmic pass. We investigate the proposed multi-task learning with multi-task optimization for solving various problem settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-24T14:04:40Z)
• Inter- and intra-uncertainty based feature aggregation model for semi-supervised histopathology image segmentation [21.973620376753594]
  hierarchical prediction uncertainty within the student model (intra-uncertainty) and image prediction uncertainty (inter-uncertainty) have not been fully utilized by existing methods. We propose a novel inter- and intra-uncertainty regularization method to measure and constrain both inter- and intra-inconsistencies in the teacher-student architecture. We also propose a new two-stage network with pseudo-mask guided feature aggregation (PG-FANet) as the segmentation model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-19T14:32:21Z)
• RLIF: Interactive Imitation Learning as Reinforcement Learning [56.997263135104504]
  We show how off-policy reinforcement learning can enable improved performance under assumptions that are similar but potentially even more practical than those of interactive imitation learning. Our proposed method uses reinforcement learning with user intervention signals themselves as rewards. This relaxes the assumption that intervening experts in interactive imitation learning should be near-optimal and enables the algorithm to learn behaviors that improve over the potential suboptimal human expert.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-21T21:05:21Z)
• A Unifying Perspective on Multi-Calibration: Game Dynamics for Multi-Objective Learning [63.20009081099896]
  We provide a unifying framework for the design and analysis of multicalibrated predictors. We exploit connections to game dynamics to achieve state-of-the-art guarantees for a diverse set of multicalibration learning problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-21T18:24:17Z)
• Hierarchical Optimization-Derived Learning [58.69200830655009]
  We establish a new framework, named Hierarchical ODL (HODL), to simultaneously investigate the intrinsic behaviors of optimization-derived model construction and its corresponding learning process. This is the first theoretical guarantee for these two coupled ODL components: optimization and learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-11T03:35:13Z)
• Synergies between Disentanglement and Sparsity: Generalization and Identifiability in Multi-Task Learning [79.83792914684985]
  We prove a new identifiability result that provides conditions under which maximally sparse base-predictors yield disentangled representations. Motivated by this theoretical result, we propose a practical approach to learn disentangled representations based on a sparsity-promoting bi-level optimization problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-26T21:02:09Z)
• Weighted Ensemble Self-Supervised Learning [67.24482854208783]
  Ensembling has proven to be a powerful technique for boosting model performance. We develop a framework that permits data-dependent weighted cross-entropy losses. Our method outperforms both in multiple evaluation metrics on ImageNet-1K.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-11-18T02:00:17Z)
• Mitigating Gradient Bias in Multi-objective Learning: A Provably Convergent Stochastic Approach [38.76462300149459]
  We develop a Multi-objective Correction (MoCo) method for multi-objective gradient optimization. The unique feature of our method is that it can guarantee convergence without increasing the non fairness gradient.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-23T05:54:26Z)
• Consistency-Based Semi-supervised Evidential Active Learning for Diagnostic Radiograph Classification [2.3545156585418328]
  We introduce a novel Consistency-based Semi-supervised Evidential Active Learning framework (CSEAL) We leverage predictive uncertainty based on theories of evidence and subjective logic to develop an end-to-end integrated approach. Our approach can substantially improve accuracy on rarer abnormalities with fewer labelled samples.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-05T09:28:31Z)
• Task-Agnostic Continual Reinforcement Learning: Gaining Insights and Overcoming Challenges [27.474011433615317]
  Continual learning (CL) enables the development of models and agents that learn from a sequence of tasks. We investigate the factors that contribute to the performance differences between task-agnostic CL and multi-task (MTL) agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-28T17:59:00Z)
• On the pitfalls of entropy-based uncertainty for multi-class semi-supervised segmentation [8.464487190628395]
  Semi-supervised learning has emerged as an appealing strategy to train deep models with limited supervision. We demonstrate in this work that this strategy leads to suboptimal results in a multi-class context. We propose an alternative solution to compute the uncertainty in a multi-class setting, based on divergence distances and which account for inter-class overlap.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-07T18:35:17Z)
• On Modality Bias Recognition and Reduction [70.69194431713825]
  We study the modality bias problem in the context of multi-modal classification. We propose a plug-and-play loss function method, whereby the feature space for each label is adaptively learned. Our method yields remarkable performance improvements compared with the baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-02-25T13:47:09Z)
• In Defense of the Unitary Scalarization for Deep Multi-Task Learning [121.76421174107463]
  We present a theoretical analysis suggesting that many specialized multi-tasks can be interpreted as forms of regularization. We show that, when coupled with standard regularization and stabilization techniques, unitary scalarization matches or improves upon the performance of complex multitasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-11T18:44:17Z)
• MORAL: Aligning AI with Human Norms through Multi-Objective Reinforced Active Learning [14.06682547001011]
  State-of-the art methods typically focus on learning a single reward model. We propose Multi-Objective Reinforced Active Learning (MORAL), a novel method for combining diverse demonstrations of social norms. Our approach is able to interactively tune a deep RL agent towards a variety of preferences, while eliminating the need for computing multiple policies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-30T19:21:03Z)
• Adversarial Robustness with Semi-Infinite Constrained Learning [177.42714838799924]
  Deep learning to inputs perturbations has raised serious questions about its use in safety-critical domains. We propose a hybrid Langevin Monte Carlo training approach to mitigate this issue. We show that our approach can mitigate the trade-off between state-of-the-art performance and robust robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-10-29T13:30:42Z)
• Few-shot Action Recognition with Prototype-centered Attentive Learning [88.10852114988829]
  Prototype-centered Attentive Learning (PAL) model composed of two novel components. First, a prototype-centered contrastive learning loss is introduced to complement the conventional query-centered learning objective. Second, PAL integrates a attentive hybrid learning mechanism that can minimize the negative impacts of outliers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-20T11:48:12Z)
• Learning Invariant Representation for Continual Learning [5.979373021392084]
  A key challenge in Continual learning is catastrophically forgetting previously learned tasks when the agent faces a new one. We propose a new pseudo-rehearsal-based method, named learning Invariant Representation for Continual Learning (IRCL) Disentangling the shared invariant representation helps to learn continually a sequence of tasks, while being more robust to forgetting and having better knowledge transfer.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-15T15:12:51Z)
• Multi-task Supervised Learning via Cross-learning [102.64082402388192]
  We consider a problem known as multi-task learning, consisting of fitting a set of regression functions intended for solving different tasks. In our novel formulation, we couple the parameters of these functions, so that they learn in their task specific domains while staying close to each other. This facilitates cross-fertilization in which data collected across different domains help improving the learning performance at each other task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-24T21:35:57Z)
• Reparameterizing Convolutions for Incremental Multi-Task Learning without Task Interference [75.95287293847697]
  Two common challenges in developing multi-task models are often overlooked in literature. First, enabling the model to be inherently incremental, continuously incorporating information from new tasks without forgetting the previously learned ones (incremental learning) Second, eliminating adverse interactions amongst tasks, which has been shown to significantly degrade the single-task performance in a multi-task setup (task interference)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-24T14:44:46Z)
• An Online Method for A Class of Distributionally Robust Optimization with Non-Convex Objectives [54.29001037565384]
  We propose a practical online method for solving a class of online distributionally robust optimization (DRO) problems. Our studies demonstrate important applications in machine learning for improving the robustness of networks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-17T20:19:25Z)
• Learning From Multiple Experts: Self-paced Knowledge Distillation for Long-tailed Classification [106.08067870620218]
  We propose a self-paced knowledge distillation framework, termed Learning From Multiple Experts (LFME) We refer to these models as 'Experts', and the proposed LFME framework aggregates the knowledge from multiple 'Experts' to learn a unified student model. We conduct extensive experiments and demonstrate that our method is able to achieve superior performances compared to state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-01-06T12:57:36Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.