Code-Driven Law NO, Normware SI!

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.17257v1
• Date: Sat, 05 Oct 2024 22:37:45 GMT
• Title: Code-Driven Law NO, Normware SI!
• Authors: Giovanni Sileno,
• Abstract summary: We argue that normware-centred views provide a more adequate abstraction to study and design interactions between computational systems and human institutions. This paper introduces and elaborates on "normware" as an explicit additional stance -- complementary to software and hardware -- for the interpretation and the design of artificial devices.
• Score: 0.0
• License:
• Abstract: With the digitalization of society, the interest, the debates and the research efforts concerning "code", "law", "artificial intelligence", and their various relationships, have been widely increasing. Yet, most arguments primarily focus on contemporary computational methods and artifacts (inferential models constructed via machine-learning methods, rule-based systems, smart contracts, ...), rather than attempting to identify more fundamental mechanisms. Aiming to go beyond this conceptual limitation, this paper introduces and elaborates on "normware" as an explicit additional stance -- complementary to software and hardware -- for the interpretation and the design of artificial devices. By means of a few examples, we argue that normware-centred views provide a more adequate abstraction to study and design interactions between computational systems and human institutions, and may help with the design and development of technical interventions within wider socio-technical views.

Related papers

• Architectural Patterns for Designing Quantum Artificial Intelligence Systems [25.42535682546052]
  Utilising quantum computing technology to enhance artificial intelligence systems is expected to improve training and inference times, increase robustness against noise and adversarial attacks, and reduce the number of parameters without compromising accuracy. However, moving beyond proof-of-concept or simulations to develop practical applications of these systems faces significant challenges due to the limitations of quantum hardware and the underdeveloped knowledge base in software engineering for such systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-14T05:09:07Z)
• Coding for Intelligence from the Perspective of Category [66.14012258680992]
  Coding targets compressing and reconstructing data, and intelligence. Recent trends demonstrate the potential homogeneity of these two fields. We propose a novel problem of Coding for Intelligence from the category theory view.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-01T07:05:44Z)
• An Abstraction Hierarchy Toward Productive Quantum Programming [0.3640881838485995]
  We propose an abstraction hierarchy to support quantum software engineering. We discuss the consequences of overlaps across the programming, execution, and hardware models found in current technologies. While our work points to concrete conceptual challenges and gaps in quantum programming, our primary thesis is that progress hinges on thinking about the abstraction hierarchy holistically.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-22T18:48:36Z)
• Deep learning applied to computational mechanics: A comprehensive review, state of the art, and the classics [77.34726150561087]
  Recent developments in artificial neural networks, particularly deep learning (DL), are reviewed in detail. Both hybrid and pure machine learning (ML) methods are discussed. History and limitations of AI are recounted and discussed, with particular attention at pointing out misstatements or misconceptions of the classics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-18T02:03:00Z)
• Foundations and Recent Trends in Multimodal Machine Learning: Principles, Challenges, and Open Questions [68.6358773622615]
  This paper provides an overview of the computational and theoretical foundations of multimodal machine learning. We propose a taxonomy of 6 core technical challenges: representation, alignment, reasoning, generation, transference, and quantification. Recent technical achievements will be presented through the lens of this taxonomy, allowing researchers to understand the similarities and differences across new approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-09-07T19:21:19Z)
• Core and Periphery as Closed-System Precepts for Engineering General Intelligence [62.997667081978825]
  It is unclear if an AI system's inputs will be independent of its outputs, and, therefore, if AI systems can be treated as traditional components. This paper posits that engineering general intelligence requires new general systems precepts, termed the core and periphery.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-08-04T18:20:25Z)
• On Heuristic Models, Assumptions, and Parameters [0.76146285961466]
  We argue that the social effects of computing can depend just as much on obscure technical caveats, choices, and qualifiers. We describe three classes of objects used to encode these choices and qualifiers: models, assumptions, and parameters. We raise six reasons these objects may be hazardous to comprehensive analysis of computing and argue they deserve deliberate consideration as researchers explain scientific work.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-19T04:32:11Z)
• Towards a Common Testing Terminology for Software Engineering and Artificial Intelligence Experts [0.9799637101641152]
  This paper contributes a mapping between the most important concepts from classical software testing and AI testing. In the mapping, we highlight differences in relevance and naming of the mapped concepts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-08-31T13:50:15Z)
• An interdisciplinary conceptual study of Artificial Intelligence (AI) for helping benefit-risk assessment practices: Towards a comprehensive qualification matrix of AI programs and devices (pre-print 2020) [55.41644538483948]
  This paper proposes a comprehensive analysis of existing concepts coming from different disciplines tackling the notion of intelligence. The aim is to identify shared notions or discrepancies to consider for qualifying AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-05-07T12:01:31Z)
• A general framework for scientifically inspired explanations in AI [76.48625630211943]
  We instantiate the concept of structure of scientific explanation as the theoretical underpinning for a general framework in which explanations for AI systems can be implemented. This framework aims to provide the tools to build a "mental-model" of any AI system so that the interaction with the user can provide information on demand and be closer to the nature of human-made explanations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-03-02T10:32:21Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.