Dynamic Guided and Domain Applicable Safeguards for Enhanced Security in Large Language Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.17922v2
• Date: Sun, 09 Feb 2025 03:34:47 GMT
• Title: Dynamic Guided and Domain Applicable Safeguards for Enhanced Security in Large Language Models
• Authors: Weidi Luo, He Cao, Zijing Liu, Yu Wang, Aidan Wong, Bing Feng, Yuan Yao, Yu Li,
• Abstract summary: We introduce a multi-agents-based defense framework, Guide for Defense (G4D), which provides analytically grounded safety response guidance.<n>Extensive experiments on popular jailbreak attacks and benign datasets show that our G4D can enhance LLM's robustness against jailbreak attacks on general and domain-specific scenarios.
• Score: 15.251988342073874
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: With the extensive deployment of Large Language Models (LLMs), ensuring their safety has become increasingly critical. However, existing defense methods often struggle with two key issues: (i) inadequate defense capabilities, particularly in domain-specific scenarios like chemistry, where a lack of specialized knowledge can lead to the generation of harmful responses to malicious queries. (ii) over-defensiveness, which compromises the general utility and responsiveness of LLMs. To mitigate these issues, we introduce a multi-agents-based defense framework, Guide for Defense (G4D), which leverages accurate external information to provide an unbiased summary of user intentions and analytically grounded safety response guidance. Extensive experiments on popular jailbreak attacks and benign datasets show that our G4D can enhance LLM's robustness against jailbreak attacks on general and domain-specific scenarios without compromising the model's general functionality.

Related papers

• Secure Tug-of-War (SecTOW): Iterative Defense-Attack Training with Reinforcement Learning for Multimodal Model Security [63.41350337821108]
  We propose Secure Tug-of-War (SecTOW) to enhance the security of multimodal large language models (MLLMs)<n>SecTOW consists of two modules: a defender and an auxiliary attacker, both trained iteratively using reinforcement learning (GRPO)<n>We show that SecTOW significantly improves security while preserving general performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-29T17:39:48Z)
• Attack and defense techniques in large language models: A survey and new perspectives [5.600972861188751]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have become central to numerous natural language processing tasks, but their vulnerabilities present security and ethical challenges.<n>This systematic survey explores the evolving landscape of attack and defense techniques in LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-02T03:37:52Z)
• Evolving Security in LLMs: A Study of Jailbreak Attacks and Defenses [0.5261718469769449]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly popular, powering a wide range of applications. Their widespread use has sparked concerns, especially through jailbreak attacks that bypass safety measures to produce harmful content. We present a comprehensive security analysis of large language models (LLMs), addressing critical research questions on the evolution and determinants of model safety.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-02T19:33:07Z)
• Tit-for-Tat: Safeguarding Large Vision-Language Models Against Jailbreak Attacks via Adversarial Defense [90.71884758066042]
  Large vision-language models (LVLMs) introduce a unique vulnerability: susceptibility to malicious attacks via visual inputs. We propose ESIII (Embedding Security Instructions Into Images), a novel methodology for transforming the visual space from a source of vulnerability into an active defense mechanism.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-14T17:39:45Z)
• Safety at Scale: A Comprehensive Survey of Large Model Safety [298.05093528230753]
  We present a comprehensive taxonomy of safety threats to large models, including adversarial attacks, data poisoning, backdoor attacks, jailbreak and prompt injection attacks, energy-latency attacks, data and model extraction attacks, and emerging agent-specific threats. We identify and discuss the open challenges in large model safety, emphasizing the need for comprehensive safety evaluations, scalable and effective defense mechanisms, and sustainable data practices.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-02T05:14:22Z)
• Enhancing Model Defense Against Jailbreaks with Proactive Safety Reasoning [21.423429565221383]
  Large language models (LLMs) are vital for a wide range of applications yet remain susceptible to jailbreak threats. We propose a novel defense strategy, Safety Chain-of-Thought (SCoT), which harnesses the enhanced textitreasoning capabilities of LLMs for proactive assessment of harmful inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-31T14:45:23Z)
• Latent-space adversarial training with post-aware calibration for defending large language models against jailbreak attacks [25.212057612342218]
  Large language models (LLMs) are susceptible to jailbreak attacks, which exploit system vulnerabilities to bypass safety measures and generate harmful outputs. We propose a Latent-space Adversarial Training with Post-aware framework to address this problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-18T02:57:12Z)
• Defining and Evaluating Physical Safety for Large Language Models [62.4971588282174]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are increasingly used to control robotic systems such as drones. Their risks of causing physical threats and harm in real-world applications remain unexplored. We classify the physical safety risks of drones into four categories: (1) human-targeted threats, (2) object-targeted threats, (3) infrastructure attacks, and (4) regulatory violations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-04T17:41:25Z)
• The Dark Side of Function Calling: Pathways to Jailbreaking Large Language Models [8.423787598133972]
  This paper uncovers a critical vulnerability in the function calling process of large language models (LLMs) We introduce a novel "jailbreak function" attack method that exploits alignment discrepancies, user coercion, and the absence of rigorous safety filters. Our findings highlight the urgent need for enhanced security measures in the function calling capabilities of LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-25T10:09:21Z)
• Refuse Whenever You Feel Unsafe: Improving Safety in LLMs via Decoupled Refusal Training [67.30423823744506]
  This study addresses a critical gap in safety tuning practices for Large Language Models (LLMs) We introduce a novel approach, Decoupled Refusal Training (DeRTa), designed to empower LLMs to refuse compliance to harmful prompts at any response position. DeRTa incorporates two novel components: (1) Maximum Likelihood Estimation with Harmful Response Prefix, which trains models to recognize and avoid unsafe content by appending a segment of harmful response to the beginning of a safe response, and (2) Reinforced Transition Optimization (RTO), which equips models with the ability to transition from potential harm to safety refusal consistently throughout the harmful
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-12T09:36:33Z)
• SelfDefend: LLMs Can Defend Themselves against Jailbreaking in a Practical Manner [21.414701448926614]
  This paper introduces a generic LLM jailbreak defense framework called SelfDefend. We empirically validate using the commonly used GPT-3.5/4 models across all major jailbreak attacks. These models outperform six state-of-the-art defenses and match the performance of GPT-4-based SelfDefend.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-08T15:45:31Z)
• Adversarial Tuning: Defending Against Jailbreak Attacks for LLMs [13.317364896194903]
  We propose a two-stage adversarial tuning framework to enhance Large Language Models' generalized defense capabilities. In the first stage, we introduce the hierarchical meta-universal adversarial prompt learning to efficiently generate token-level adversarial prompts. In the second stage, we propose the automatic adversarial prompt learning to iteratively refine semantic-level adversarial prompts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-07T15:37:15Z)
• Defensive Prompt Patch: A Robust and Interpretable Defense of LLMs against Jailbreak Attacks [59.46556573924901]
  This paper introduces Defensive Prompt Patch (DPP), a novel prompt-based defense mechanism for large language models (LLMs) Unlike previous approaches, DPP is designed to achieve a minimal Attack Success Rate (ASR) while preserving the high utility of LLMs. Empirical results conducted on LLAMA-2-7B-Chat and Mistral-7B-Instruct-v0.2 models demonstrate the robustness and adaptability of DPP.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-30T14:40:35Z)
• Fine-Tuning, Quantization, and LLMs: Navigating Unintended Outcomes [0.0]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have gained widespread adoption across various domains, including chatbots and auto-task completion agents. These models are susceptible to safety vulnerabilities such as jailbreaking, prompt injection, and privacy leakage attacks. This study investigates the impact of these modifications on LLM safety, a critical consideration for building reliable and secure AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-05T20:31:45Z)
• SALAD-Bench: A Hierarchical and Comprehensive Safety Benchmark for Large Language Models [107.82336341926134]
  SALAD-Bench is a safety benchmark specifically designed for evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs) It transcends conventional benchmarks through its large scale, rich diversity, intricate taxonomy spanning three levels, and versatile functionalities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-07T17:33:54Z)
• Baseline Defenses for Adversarial Attacks Against Aligned Language Models [109.75753454188705]
  Recent work shows that text moderations can produce jailbreaking prompts that bypass defenses. We look at three types of defenses: detection (perplexity based), input preprocessing (paraphrase and retokenization), and adversarial training. We find that the weakness of existing discretes for text, combined with the relatively high costs of optimization, makes standard adaptive attacks more challenging for LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-01T17:59:44Z)
• On Evaluating Adversarial Robustness of Large Vision-Language Models [64.66104342002882]
  We evaluate the robustness of large vision-language models (VLMs) in the most realistic and high-risk setting. In particular, we first craft targeted adversarial examples against pretrained models such as CLIP and BLIP. Black-box queries on these VLMs can further improve the effectiveness of targeted evasion.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-26T13:49:44Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.