AgentForge: A Flexible Low-Code Platform for Reinforcement Learning Agent Design
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.19528v4
- Date: Wed, 02 Apr 2025 07:59:05 GMT
- Title: AgentForge: A Flexible Low-Code Platform for Reinforcement Learning Agent Design
- Authors: Francisco Erivaldo Fernandes Junior, Antti Oulasvirta,
- Abstract summary: The paper presents AgentForge, a flexible low-code platform to optimize any parameter set across a reinforcement learning system.<n>The paper presents an evaluation of its performance for a challenging vision-based RL problem.
- Score: 23.453499054567118
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
- Abstract: Developing a reinforcement learning (RL) agent often involves identifying values for numerous parameters, covering the policy, reward function, environment, and agent-internal architecture. Since these parameters are interrelated in complex ways, optimizing them is a black-box problem that proves especially challenging for nonexperts. Although existing optimization-as-a-service platforms (e.g., Vizier and Optuna) can handle such problems, they are impractical for RL systems, since the need for manual user mapping of each parameter to distinct components makes the effort cumbersome. It also requires understanding of the optimization process, limiting the systems' application beyond the machine learning field and restricting access in areas such as cognitive science, which models human decision-making. To tackle these challenges, the paper presents AgentForge, a flexible low-code platform to optimize any parameter set across an RL system. Available at https://github.com/feferna/AgentForge, it allows an optimization problem to be defined in a few lines of code and handed to any of the interfaced optimizers. With AgentForge, the user can optimize the parameters either individually or jointly. The paper presents an evaluation of its performance for a challenging vision-based RL problem.
Related papers
- ORFS-agent: Tool-Using Agents for Chip Design Optimization [0.8088986164437757]
Large Language Models (LLMs) offer new opportunities for learning and reasoning within such high-dimensional optimization tasks.<n>We introduce ORFS-agent, an LLM-based iterative optimization agent that automates parameter tuning in an open-source hardware design flow.<n>Our empirical evaluations on two different technology nodes and a range of circuit benchmarks indicate that ORFS-agent can improve both routed wirelength and effective clock period by over 13%.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-06-10T01:38:57Z) - Preference Optimization for Combinatorial Optimization Problems [54.87466279363487]
Reinforcement Learning (RL) has emerged as a powerful tool for neural optimization, enabling models learns that solve complex problems without requiring expert knowledge.<n>Despite significant progress, existing RL approaches face challenges such as diminishing reward signals and inefficient exploration in vast action spaces.<n>We propose Preference Optimization, a novel method that transforms quantitative reward signals into qualitative preference signals via statistical comparison modeling.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-05-13T16:47:00Z) - PointLoRA: Low-Rank Adaptation with Token Selection for Point Cloud Learning [54.99373314906667]
Self-supervised representation learning for point cloud has demonstrated effectiveness in improving pre-trained model performance across diverse tasks.
As pre-trained models grow in complexity, fully fine-tuning them for downstream applications demands substantial computational and storage resources.
We propose PointLoRA, a simple yet effective method that combines low-rank adaptation (LoRA) with multi-scale token selection to efficiently fine-tune point cloud models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2025-04-22T16:41:21Z) - Optima: Optimizing Effectiveness and Efficiency for LLM-Based Multi-Agent System [75.25394449773052]
Large Language Model (LLM) based multi-agent systems (MAS) show remarkable potential in collaborative problem-solving.
Yet they still face critical challenges: low communication efficiency, poor scalability, and a lack of effective parameter-updating optimization methods.
We present Optima, a novel framework that addresses these issues by significantly enhancing both communication efficiency and task effectiveness.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-10T17:00:06Z) - Can Learned Optimization Make Reinforcement Learning Less Difficult? [70.5036361852812]
We consider whether learned optimization can help overcome reinforcement learning difficulties.
Our method, Learned Optimization for Plasticity, Exploration and Non-stationarity (OPEN), meta-learns an update rule whose input features and output structure are informed by previously proposed to these difficulties.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-09T17:55:23Z) - Combining Automated Optimisation of Hyperparameters and Reward Shape [7.407166175374958]
We propose a methodology for the combined optimisation of hyperparameters and the reward function.
We conducted extensive experiments using Proximal Policy optimisation and Soft Actor-Critic.
Our results show that combined optimisation significantly improves over baseline performance in half of the environments and achieves competitive performance in the others.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-26T12:23:54Z) - Memory-Enhanced Neural Solvers for Efficient Adaptation in Combinatorial Optimization [6.713974813995327]
We present MEMENTO, an approach that leverages memory to improve the adaptation of neural solvers at time.
We successfully train all RL auto-regressive solvers on large instances, and show that MEMENTO can scale and is data-efficient.
Overall, MEMENTO enables to push the state-of-the-art on 11 out of 12 evaluated tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-24T08:18:19Z) - Iterative or Innovative? A Problem-Oriented Perspective for Code Optimization [81.88668100203913]
Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated strong capabilities in solving a wide range of programming tasks.
In this paper, we explore code optimization with a focus on performance enhancement, specifically aiming to optimize code for minimal execution time.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-17T16:10:10Z) - Adaptive Preference Scaling for Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback [103.36048042664768]
Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) is a prevalent approach to align AI systems with human values.
We propose a novel adaptive preference loss, underpinned by distributionally robust optimization (DRO)
Our method is versatile and can be readily adapted to various preference optimization frameworks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-06-04T20:33:22Z) - Adaptive $Q$-Network: On-the-fly Target Selection for Deep Reinforcement Learning [18.579378919155864]
We propose Adaptive $Q$Network (AdaQN) to take into account the non-stationarity of the optimization procedure without requiring additional samples.
AdaQN is theoretically sound and empirically validate it in MuJoCo control problems and Atari $2600 games.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-25T11:57:43Z) - Relative Preference Optimization: Enhancing LLM Alignment through Contrasting Responses across Identical and Diverse Prompts [95.09994361995389]
Relative Preference Optimization (RPO) is designed to discern between more and less preferred responses derived from both identical and related prompts.
RPO has demonstrated a superior ability to align large language models with user preferences and to improve their adaptability during the training process.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-12T22:47:57Z) - End-to-End Learning for Fair Multiobjective Optimization Under
Uncertainty [55.04219793298687]
The Predict-Then-Forecast (PtO) paradigm in machine learning aims to maximize downstream decision quality.
This paper extends the PtO methodology to optimization problems with nondifferentiable Ordered Weighted Averaging (OWA) objectives.
It shows how optimization of OWA functions can be effectively integrated with parametric prediction for fair and robust optimization under uncertainty.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-12T16:33:35Z) - Can LLMs Configure Software Tools [0.76146285961466]
In software engineering, the meticulous configuration of software tools is crucial in ensuring optimal performance within intricate systems.
In this study, we embark on an exploration of leveraging Large-Language Models (LLMs) to streamline the software configuration process.
Our work presents a novel approach that employs LLMs, such as Chat-GPT, to identify starting conditions and narrow down the search space, improving configuration efficiency.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-11T05:03:02Z) - Learning RL-Policies for Joint Beamforming Without Exploration: A Batch
Constrained Off-Policy Approach [1.0080317855851213]
We consider the problem of network parameter cancellation optimization for networks.
We show that deploying an algorithm in the real world for exploration and learning can be achieved with the data without exploring.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-12T18:36:36Z) - Prompt-Tuning Decision Transformer with Preference Ranking [83.76329715043205]
We propose the Prompt-Tuning DT algorithm to address challenges by using trajectory segments as prompts to guide RL agents in acquiring environmental information.
Our approach involves randomly sampling a Gaussian distribution to fine-tune the elements of the prompt trajectory and using preference ranking function to find the optimization direction.
Our work contributes to the advancement of prompt-tuning approaches in RL, providing a promising direction for optimizing large RL agents for specific preference tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-16T17:49:04Z) - Multi-Agent Reinforcement Learning for Microprocessor Design Space
Exploration [71.95914457415624]
Microprocessor architects are increasingly resorting to domain-specific customization in the quest for high-performance and energy-efficiency.
We propose an alternative formulation that leverages Multi-Agent RL (MARL) to tackle this problem.
Our evaluation shows that the MARL formulation consistently outperforms single-agent RL baselines.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-11-29T17:10:24Z) - Hyperparameter Tuning for Deep Reinforcement Learning Applications [0.3553493344868413]
We propose a distributed variable-length genetic algorithm framework to tune hyperparameters for various RL applications.
Our results show that with more generations, optimal solutions that require fewer training episodes and are computationally cheap while being more robust for deployment.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-26T20:43:13Z) - Optimizing Wireless Systems Using Unsupervised and
Reinforced-Unsupervised Deep Learning [96.01176486957226]
Resource allocation and transceivers in wireless networks are usually designed by solving optimization problems.
In this article, we introduce unsupervised and reinforced-unsupervised learning frameworks for solving both variable and functional optimization problems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-01-03T11:01:52Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.