MMDocBench: Benchmarking Large Vision-Language Models for Fine-Grained Visual Document Understanding

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.21311v1
• Date: Fri, 25 Oct 2024 16:00:55 GMT
• Title: MMDocBench: Benchmarking Large Vision-Language Models for Fine-Grained Visual Document Understanding
• Authors: Fengbin Zhu, Ziyang Liu, Xiang Yao Ng, Haohui Wu, Wenjie Wang, Fuli Feng, Chao Wang, Huanbo Luan, Tat Seng Chua,
• Abstract summary: Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have achieved remarkable performance in many vision-language tasks. Existing benchmarks either contain limited fine-grained evaluation samples mixed with other data, or are confined to object-level assessments in natural images. We propose using document images with multi-granularity and multi-modal information to supplement natural images.
• Score: 66.23502779435053
• License:
• Abstract: Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have achieved remarkable performance in many vision-language tasks, yet their capabilities in fine-grained visual understanding remain insufficiently evaluated. Existing benchmarks either contain limited fine-grained evaluation samples that are mixed with other data, or are confined to object-level assessments in natural images. To holistically assess LVLMs' fine-grained visual understanding capabilities, we propose using document images with multi-granularity and multi-modal information to supplement natural images. In this light, we construct MMDocBench, a benchmark with various OCR-free document understanding tasks for the evaluation of fine-grained visual perception and reasoning abilities. MMDocBench defines 15 main tasks with 4,338 QA pairs and 11,353 supporting regions, covering various document images such as research papers, receipts, financial reports, Wikipedia tables, charts, and infographics. Based on MMDocBench, we conduct extensive experiments using 13 open-source and 3 proprietary advanced LVLMs, assessing their strengths and weaknesses across different tasks and document image types. The benchmark, task instructions, and evaluation code will be made publicly available.

Related papers

• MMR: Evaluating Reading Ability of Large Multimodal Models [52.953316772123586]
  Large multimodal models (LMMs) have demonstrated impressive capabilities in understanding various types of image, including text-rich images. Current benchmarks fail to accurately reflect performance of different models. We propose the Multi-Modal Reading (MMR) benchmark in 11 diverse tasks to evaluate LMMs for text-rich image understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-26T19:26:50Z)
• MIBench: Evaluating Multimodal Large Language Models over Multiple Images [70.44423964171088]
  We propose a new benchmark MIBench, to comprehensively evaluate fine-grained abilities of MLLMs in multi-image scenarios. Specifically, MIBench categorizes the multi-image abilities into three scenarios: multi-image instruction (MII), multimodal knowledge-seeking (MKS) and multimodal in-context learning (MIC) The results reveal that although current models excel in single-image tasks, they exhibit significant shortcomings when faced with multi-image inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-21T21:22:58Z)
• TextHawk: Exploring Efficient Fine-Grained Perception of Multimodal Large Language Models [9.232693392690702]
  TextHawk is a document-oriented Multimodal Large Language Model (MLLM) It is designed to explore efficient fine-grained perception by designing four dedicated components. We conduct extensive experiments on both general and document-oriented MLLM benchmarks, and show that TextHawk outperforms the state-of-the-art methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-14T09:48:37Z)
• HRVDA: High-Resolution Visual Document Assistant [32.51417315241559]
  We propose a High-Resolution Visual Document Assistant (HRVDA) to bridge the gap between MLLMs and visual document understanding. HRVDA employs a content filtering mechanism and an instruction filtering module to filter out the content-agnostic visual tokens and instruction-agnostic visual tokens. Our model achieves state-of-the-art performance across multiple document understanding datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-10T11:10:50Z)
• Enhancing Visual Document Understanding with Contrastive Learning in Large Visual-Language Models [56.76307866160105]
  We propose a contrastive learning framework, termed Document Object COntrastive learning (DoCo) DoCo leverages an auxiliary multimodal encoder to obtain the features of document objects and align them to the visual features generated by the vision encoder of Large Visual-Language Models (LVLMs) We demonstrate that the proposed DoCo serves as a plug-and-play pre-training method, which can be employed in the pre-training of various LVLMs without inducing any increase in computational complexity during the inference process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-29T10:17:27Z)
• CODIS: Benchmarking Context-Dependent Visual Comprehension for Multimodal Large Language Models [58.95889895912716]
  We introduce a new benchmark, named as CODIS, designed to assess the ability of models to use context provided in free-form text to enhance visual comprehension. Our findings indicate that MLLMs consistently fall short of human performance on this benchmark. This underscores the pressing need to enhance the ability of MLLMs to comprehend visuals in a context-dependent manner.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-21T08:21:12Z)
• DocPedia: Unleashing the Power of Large Multimodal Model in the Frequency Domain for Versatile Document Understanding [98.41782470335032]
  This work presents DocPedia, a novel large multimodal model (LMM) for versatile OCR-free document understanding. Unlike existing work either struggle with high-resolution documents or give up the large language model thus vision or language ability constrained, our DocPedia directly processes visual input in the frequency domain rather than the pixel space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-20T14:42:25Z)
• Analyzing the Efficacy of an LLM-Only Approach for Image-based Document Question Answering [12.064056743478865]
  We study the relative contributions of the vision encoder and the language model in document question answering tasks. Our comprehensive analysis encompasses six diverse benchmark datasets, utilizing LLMs of varying scales. Our findings reveal that a strategy exclusively reliant on the LLM yields results that are on par with or closely approach state-of-the-art performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-25T07:01:16Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.