OmniDocBench: Benchmarking Diverse PDF Document Parsing with Comprehensive Annotations

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2412.07626v2
• Date: Tue, 25 Mar 2025 06:19:32 GMT
• Title: OmniDocBench: Benchmarking Diverse PDF Document Parsing with Comprehensive Annotations
• Authors: Linke Ouyang, Yuan Qu, Hongbin Zhou, Jiawei Zhu, Rui Zhang, Qunshu Lin, Bin Wang, Zhiyuan Zhao, Man Jiang, Xiaomeng Zhao, Jin Shi, Fan Wu, Pei Chu, Minghao Liu, Zhenxiang Li, Chao Xu, Bo Zhang, Botian Shi, Zhongying Tu, Conghui He,
• Abstract summary: We introduce OmniDocBench, a novel benchmark featuring high-quality annotations across nine document sources.<n>We conduct a thorough evaluation of both pipeline-based methods and end-to-end vision-language models.
• Score: 22.336858733121158
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Document content extraction is a critical task in computer vision, underpinning the data needs of large language models (LLMs) and retrieval-augmented generation (RAG) systems. Despite recent progress, current document parsing methods have not been fairly and comprehensively evaluated due to the narrow coverage of document types and the simplified, unrealistic evaluation procedures in existing benchmarks. To address these gaps, we introduce OmniDocBench, a novel benchmark featuring high-quality annotations across nine document sources, including academic papers, textbooks, and more challenging cases such as handwritten notes and densely typeset newspapers. OmniDocBench supports flexible, multi-level evaluations--ranging from an end-to-end assessment to the task-specific and attribute--based analysis using 19 layout categories and 15 attribute labels. We conduct a thorough evaluation of both pipeline-based methods and end-to-end vision-language models, revealing their strengths and weaknesses across different document types. OmniDocBench sets a new standard for the fair, diverse, and fine-grained evaluation in document parsing. Dataset and code are available at https://github.com/opendatalab/OmniDocBench.

Related papers

• VDocRAG: Retrieval-Augmented Generation over Visually-Rich Documents [30.012487475552575]
  We introduce a new RAG framework, VDocRAG, which can directly understand varied documents and modalities in a unified image format. We also introduce OpenDocVQA, the first unified collection of open-domain document visual question answering datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-14T01:50:33Z)
• M-DocSum: Do LVLMs Genuinely Comprehend Interleaved Image-Text in Document Summarization? [49.53982792497275]
  We investigate whether Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) genuinely comprehend interleaved image-text in the document. Existing document understanding benchmarks often assess LVLMs using question-answer formats. We introduce a novel and challenging Multimodal Document Summarization Benchmark (M-DocSum-Bench) M-DocSum-Bench comprises 500 high-quality arXiv papers, along with interleaved multimodal summaries aligned with human preferences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-27T07:28:32Z)
• Éclair -- Extracting Content and Layout with Integrated Reading Order for Documents [7.358946120326249]
  We introduce 'Eclair, a text-extraction tool specifically designed to process a wide range of document types. Given an image, 'Eclair is able to extract formatted text in reading order, along with bounding boxes and their corresponding semantic classes. 'Eclair achieves state-of-the-art accuracy on this benchmark, outperforming other methods across key metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-06T17:07:22Z)
• BigDocs: An Open and Permissively-Licensed Dataset for Training Multimodal Models on Document and Code Tasks [55.61185100263898]
  We introduce BigDocs-7.5M, a high-quality, open-access dataset comprising 7.5 million multimodal documents across 30 tasks.<n>We also introduce BigDocs-Bench, a benchmark suite with 10 novel tasks.<n>Our experiments show that training with BigDocs-Bench improves average performance up to 25.8% over closed-source GPT-4o.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-05T21:41:20Z)
• MMDocBench: Benchmarking Large Vision-Language Models for Fine-Grained Visual Document Understanding [66.23502779435053]
  Large Vision-Language Models (LVLMs) have achieved remarkable performance in many vision-language tasks. Existing benchmarks either contain limited fine-grained evaluation samples mixed with other data, or are confined to object-level assessments in natural images. We propose using document images with multi-granularity and multi-modal information to supplement natural images.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-25T16:00:55Z)
• Contextual Document Embeddings [77.22328616983417]
  We propose two complementary methods for contextualized document embeddings. First, an alternative contrastive learning objective that explicitly incorporates the document neighbors into the intra-batch contextual loss. Second, a new contextual architecture that explicitly encodes neighbor document information into the encoded representation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-03T14:33:34Z)
• SynthDoc: Bilingual Documents Synthesis for Visual Document Understanding [23.910783272007407]
  This paper introduces SynthDoc, a novel synthetic document generation pipeline designed to enhance Visual Document Understanding (VDU) Addressing the challenges of data acquisition and the limitations of existing datasets, SynthDoc leverages publicly available corpora and advanced rendering tools to create a comprehensive and versatile dataset. Our experiments, conducted using the Donut model, demonstrate that models trained with SynthDoc's data achieve superior performance in pre-training read tasks and maintain robustness in downstream tasks, despite language inconsistencies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-27T03:31:24Z)
• DocGenome: An Open Large-scale Scientific Document Benchmark for Training and Testing Multi-modal Large Language Models [63.466265039007816]
  We present DocGenome, a structured document benchmark constructed by annotating 500K scientific documents from 153 disciplines in the arXiv open-access community. We conduct extensive experiments to demonstrate the advantages of DocGenome and objectively evaluate the performance of large models on our benchmark.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T15:13:52Z)
• Unifying Multimodal Retrieval via Document Screenshot Embedding [92.03571344075607]
  Document Screenshot Embedding (DSE) is a novel retrieval paradigm that regards document screenshots as a unified input format.<n>We first craft the dataset of Wiki-SS, a 1.3M Wikipedia web page screenshots as the corpus to answer the questions from the Natural Questions dataset.<n>For example, DSE outperforms BM25 by 17 points in top-1 retrieval accuracy. Additionally, in a mixed-modality task of slide retrieval, DSE significantly outperforms OCR text retrieval methods by over 15 points in nDCG@10.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-17T06:27:35Z)
• Beyond Document Page Classification: Design, Datasets, and Challenges [32.94494070330065]
  This paper highlights the need to bring document classification benchmarking closer to real-world applications. We identify the lack of public multi-page document classification datasets, formalize different classification tasks arising in application scenarios, and motivate the value of targeting efficient multi-page document representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-24T16:16:47Z)
• Unified Pretraining Framework for Document Understanding [52.224359498792836]
  We present UDoc, a new unified pretraining framework for document understanding. UDoc is designed to support most document understanding tasks, extending the Transformer to take multimodal embeddings as input. An important feature of UDoc is that it learns a generic representation by making use of three self-supervised losses.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-22T21:47:04Z)
• docExtractor: An off-the-shelf historical document element extraction [18.828438308738495]
  We present docExtractor, a generic approach for extracting visual elements such as text lines or illustrations from historical documents. We demonstrate it provides high-quality performances as an off-the-shelf system across a wide variety of datasets. We introduce a new public dataset dubbed IlluHisDoc dedicated to the fine evaluation of illustration segmentation in historical documents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-15T10:19:18Z)
• DocBank: A Benchmark Dataset for Document Layout Analysis [114.81155155508083]
  We present textbfDocBank, a benchmark dataset that contains 500K document pages with fine-grained token-level annotations for document layout analysis. Experiment results show that models trained on DocBank accurately recognize the layout information for a variety of documents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-01T16:04:30Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.