Unveiling the Role of Expert Guidance: A Comparative Analysis of User-centered Imitation Learning and Traditional Reinforcement Learning
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.21403v1
- Date: Mon, 28 Oct 2024 18:07:44 GMT
- Title: Unveiling the Role of Expert Guidance: A Comparative Analysis of User-centered Imitation Learning and Traditional Reinforcement Learning
- Authors: Amr Gomaa, Bilal Mahdy,
- Abstract summary: This study explores the performance, robustness, and limitations of imitation learning compared to traditional reinforcement learning methods.
The insights gained from this study contribute to the advancement of human-centered artificial intelligence.
- Score: 0.0
- License:
- Abstract: Integration of human feedback plays a key role in improving the learning capabilities of intelligent systems. This comparative study delves into the performance, robustness, and limitations of imitation learning compared to traditional reinforcement learning methods within these systems. Recognizing the value of human-in-the-loop feedback, we investigate the influence of expert guidance and suboptimal demonstrations on the learning process. Through extensive experimentation and evaluations conducted in a pre-existing simulation environment using the Unity platform, we meticulously analyze the effectiveness and limitations of these learning approaches. The insights gained from this study contribute to the advancement of human-centered artificial intelligence by highlighting the benefits and challenges associated with the incorporation of human feedback into the learning process. Ultimately, this research promotes the development of models that can effectively address complex real-world problems.
Related papers
- Predicting and Understanding Human Action Decisions: Insights from Large Language Models and Cognitive Instance-Based Learning [0.0]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated their capabilities across various tasks.
This paper exploits the reasoning and generative capabilities of the LLMs to predict human behavior in two sequential decision-making tasks.
We compare the performance of LLMs with a cognitive instance-based learning model, which imitates human experiential decision-making.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-12T14:13:06Z) - The Power of Combined Modalities in Interactive Robot Learning [0.0]
This study contributes to the evolving field of robot learning in interaction with humans, examining the impact of diverse input modalities on learning outcomes.
It introduces the concept of "meta-modalities" which encapsulate additional forms of feedback beyond the traditional preference and scalar feedback mechanisms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-13T14:59:44Z) - Deep Active Learning: A Reality Check [30.19086526296748]
No single-model method decisively outperforms entropy-based active learning.
We extend our evaluation to other tasks, exploring the active learning effectiveness in combination with semi-supervised learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-21T19:28:17Z) - Evaluating and Optimizing Educational Content with Large Language Model Judgments [52.33701672559594]
We use Language Models (LMs) as educational experts to assess the impact of various instructions on learning outcomes.
We introduce an instruction optimization approach in which one LM generates instructional materials using the judgments of another LM as a reward function.
Human teachers' evaluations of these LM-generated worksheets show a significant alignment between the LM judgments and human teacher preferences.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-05T09:09:15Z) - RLIF: Interactive Imitation Learning as Reinforcement Learning [56.997263135104504]
We show how off-policy reinforcement learning can enable improved performance under assumptions that are similar but potentially even more practical than those of interactive imitation learning.
Our proposed method uses reinforcement learning with user intervention signals themselves as rewards.
This relaxes the assumption that intervening experts in interactive imitation learning should be near-optimal and enables the algorithm to learn behaviors that improve over the potential suboptimal human expert.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-11-21T21:05:21Z) - A Novel Neural-symbolic System under Statistical Relational Learning [50.747658038910565]
We propose a general bi-level probabilistic graphical reasoning framework called GBPGR.
In GBPGR, the results of symbolic reasoning are utilized to refine and correct the predictions made by the deep learning models.
Our approach achieves high performance and exhibits effective generalization in both transductive and inductive tasks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-16T09:15:37Z) - Machine Psychology [54.287802134327485]
We argue that a fruitful direction for research is engaging large language models in behavioral experiments inspired by psychology.
We highlight theoretical perspectives, experimental paradigms, and computational analysis techniques that this approach brings to the table.
It paves the way for a "machine psychology" for generative artificial intelligence (AI) that goes beyond performance benchmarks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-03-24T13:24:41Z) - Rethinking Learning Dynamics in RL using Adversarial Networks [79.56118674435844]
We present a learning mechanism for reinforcement learning of closely related skills parameterized via a skill embedding space.
The main contribution of our work is to formulate an adversarial training regime for reinforcement learning with the help of entropy-regularized policy gradient formulation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-01-27T19:51:09Z) - Prioritized Experience-based Reinforcement Learning with Human Guidance:
Methdology and Application to Autonomous Driving [2.5895890901896124]
Reinforcement learning requires skillful definition and remarkable computational efforts to solve optimization and control problems.
In this paper, a comprehensive human guidance-based reinforcement learning framework is established.
A novel prioritized experience replay mechanism that adapts to human guidance is proposed to boost the efficiency and performance of the reinforcement learning algorithm.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2021-09-26T07:19:26Z) - Transfer Learning in Deep Reinforcement Learning: A Survey [64.36174156782333]
Reinforcement learning is a learning paradigm for solving sequential decision-making problems.
Recent years have witnessed remarkable progress in reinforcement learning upon the fast development of deep neural networks.
transfer learning has arisen to tackle various challenges faced by reinforcement learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2020-09-16T18:38:54Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.