Brain age identification from diffusion MRI synergistically predicts neurodegenerative disease

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.22454v2
• Date: Wed, 19 Feb 2025 23:45:35 GMT
• Title: Brain age identification from diffusion MRI synergistically predicts neurodegenerative disease
• Authors: Chenyu Gao, Michael E. Kim, Karthik Ramadass, Praitayini Kanakaraj, Aravind R. Krishnan, Adam M. Saunders, Nancy R. Newlin, Ho Hin Lee, Qi Yang, Warren D. Taylor, Brian D. Boyd, Lori L. Beason-Held, Susan M. Resnick, Lisa L. Barnes, David A. Bennett, Katherine D. Van Schaik, Derek B. Archer, Timothy J. Hohman, Angela L. Jefferson, Ivana Išgum, Daniel Moyer, Yuankai Huo, Kurt G. Schilling, Lianrui Zuo, Shunxing Bao, Nazirah Mohd Khairi, Zhiyuan Li, Christos Davatzikos, Bennett A. Landman,
• Abstract summary: We propose a method for brain age identification from dMRI that mitigates the model's use of macrostructural information. We observe difference between our dMRI-based brain age and T1w MRI-based brain age across stages of neurodegeneration. dMRI-based brain age may offer advantages over T1w MRI-based brain age in predicting the transition from CN to MCI up to five years before diagnosis.
• Score: 13.531048347211021
• License:
• Abstract: Estimated brain age from magnetic resonance image (MRI) and its deviation from chronological age can provide early insights into potential neurodegenerative diseases, supporting early detection and implementation of prevention strategies. Diffusion MRI (dMRI) presents an opportunity to build an earlier biomarker for neurodegenerative disease prediction because it captures subtle microstructural changes that precede more perceptible macrostructural changes. However, the coexistence of macro- and micro-structural information in dMRI raises the question of whether current dMRI-based brain age estimation models are leveraging the intended microstructural information or if they inadvertently rely on the macrostructural information. To develop a microstructure-specific brain age, we propose a method for brain age identification from dMRI that mitigates the model's use of macrostructural information by non-rigidly registering all images to a standard template. Imaging data from 13,398 participants across 12 datasets were used for the training and evaluation. We compare our brain age models, trained with and without macrostructural information mitigated, with an architecturally similar T1-weighted (T1w) MRI-based brain age model and two recent, popular, openly available T1w MRI-based brain age models that primarily use macrostructural information. We observe difference between our dMRI-based brain age and T1w MRI-based brain age across stages of neurodegeneration, with dMRI-based brain age being older than T1w MRI-based brain age in participants transitioning from cognitively normal (CN) to mild cognitive impairment (MCI), but younger in participants already diagnosed with Alzheimer's disease (AD). Furthermore, dMRI-based brain age may offer advantages over T1w MRI-based brain age in predicting the transition from CN to MCI up to five years before diagnosis.

Related papers

• Explainable Brain Age Gap Prediction in Neurodegenerative Conditions using coVariance Neural Networks [94.06526659234756]
  Black-box machine learning approaches to brain age gap prediction have limited practical utility. We apply the VNN-based approach to study brain age gap using cortical thickness features for various prevalent neurodegenerative conditions. Our results reveal distinct anatomic patterns for brain age gap in Alzheimer's disease, frontotemporal dementia, and atypical Parkinsonian disorders.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-02T19:37:09Z)
• Enhancing Brain Age Estimation with a Multimodal 3D CNN Approach Combining Structural MRI and AI-Synthesized Cerebral Blood Volume Data [14.815462507141163]
  Brain Age Gap Estimation (BrainAGE) offers a neuroimaging biomarker for understanding brain age. Current approaches primarily use T1-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (T1w MRI) data, capturing only structural brain information. We developed a deep learning model using a VGG-based architecture for both modalities and combined their predictions using linear regression. Our model achieved a mean absolute error (MAE) of 3.95 years and an $R2$ of 0.943 on the test set, outperforming existing models trained on similar data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-01T21:54:08Z)
• Anatomical Foundation Models for Brain MRIs [6.993491018326816]
  We propose AnatCL, an anatomical foundation model for brain MRIs. We consider 12 different downstream tasks for the diagnosis of different conditions. Our findings show that incorporating anatomical information during pre-training leads to more robust and general representations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-07T14:04:50Z)
• Knowledge-Guided Prompt Learning for Lifespan Brain MR Image Segmentation [53.70131202548981]
  We present a two-step segmentation framework employing Knowledge-Guided Prompt Learning (KGPL) for brain MRI. Specifically, we first pre-train segmentation models on large-scale datasets with sub-optimal labels. The introduction of knowledge-wise prompts captures semantic relationships between anatomical variability and biological processes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-31T04:32:43Z)
• Robust Brain Age Estimation via Regression Models and MRI-derived Features [2.028990630951476]
  We present a novel brain age estimation framework using the Open Big Healthy Brain (OpenBHB) dataset. Our approach integrates three different MRI-derived region-wise features and different regression models, resulting in a highly accurate brain age estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-08T19:07:22Z)
• Patched Diffusion Models for Unsupervised Anomaly Detection in Brain MRI [55.78588835407174]
  We propose a method that reformulates the generation task of diffusion models as a patch-based estimation of healthy brain anatomy. We evaluate our approach on data of tumors and multiple sclerosis lesions and demonstrate a relative improvement of 25.1% compared to existing baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-07T09:40:22Z)
• Unsupervised Anomaly Detection in 3D Brain MRI using Deep Learning with Multi-Task Brain Age Prediction [53.122045119395594]
  Unsupervised anomaly detection (UAD) in brain MRI with deep learning has shown promising results. We propose deep learning for UAD in 3D brain MRI considering additional age information. Based on our analysis, we propose a novel deep learning approach for UAD with multi-task age prediction.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-01-31T09:39:52Z)
• Brain Age Estimation From MRI Using Cascade Networks with Ranking Loss [75.03117866578913]
  A novel 3D convolutional network, called two-stage-age-network (TSAN), is proposed to estimate brain age from T1-weighted MRI data. Experiments with $6586$ MRIs showed that TSAN could provide accurate brain age estimation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-06T07:11:25Z)
• Neurodevelopmental Age Estimation of Infants Using a 3D-Convolutional Neural Network Model based on Fusion MRI Sequences [0.08341869765517104]
  The ability to determine if the brain is developing normally is a key component of pediatric neuroradiology and neurology. We investigated a three-dimensional convolutional neural network (3D CNN) to rapidly classify brain developmental age using common MRI sequences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-07T01:24:15Z)
• Patch-based Brain Age Estimation from MR Images [64.66978138243083]
  Brain age estimation from Magnetic Resonance Images (MRI) derives the difference between a subject's biological brain age and their chronological age. Early detection of neurodegeneration manifesting as a higher brain age can potentially facilitate better medical care and planning for affected individuals. We develop a new deep learning approach that uses 3D patches of the brain as well as convolutional neural networks (CNNs) to develop a localised brain age estimator.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-08-29T11:50:37Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.