Argumentation and Machine Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.23724v1
• Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 08:19:58 GMT
• Title: Argumentation and Machine Learning
• Authors: Antonio Rago, Kristijonas Čyras, Jack Mumford, Oana Cocarascu,
• Abstract summary: This chapter provides an overview of research works that present approaches with some degree of cross-fertilisation between Computational Argumentation and Machine Learning. Two broad themes representing the purpose of the interaction between these two areas were identified. We evaluate the spectrum of works across various dimensions, including the type of learning and the form of argumentation framework used.
• Score: 4.064849471241967
• License:
• Abstract: This chapter provides an overview of research works that present approaches with some degree of cross-fertilisation between Computational Argumentation and Machine Learning. Our review of the literature identified two broad themes representing the purpose of the interaction between these two areas: argumentation for machine learning and machine learning for argumentation. Across these two themes, we systematically evaluate the spectrum of works across various dimensions, including the type of learning and the form of argumentation framework used. Further, we identify three types of interaction between these two areas: synergistic approaches, where the Argumentation and Machine Learning components are tightly integrated; segmented approaches, where the two are interleaved such that the outputs of one are the inputs of the other; and approximated approaches, where one component shadows the other at a chosen level of detail. We draw conclusions about the suitability of certain forms of Argumentation for supporting certain types of Machine Learning, and vice versa, with clear patterns emerging from the review. Whilst the reviewed works provide inspiration for successfully combining the two fields of research, we also identify and discuss limitations and challenges that ought to be addressed in order to ensure that they remain a fruitful pairing as AI advances.

Related papers

• A Decoupling and Aggregating Framework for Joint Extraction of Entities and Relations [7.911978021993282]
  We propose a novel model to jointly extract entities and relations. We propose to decouple the feature encoding process into three parts, namely encoding subjects, encoding objects, and encoding relations. Our model outperforms several previous state-of-the-art models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-14T04:27:16Z)
• Combining Machine Learning and Ontology: A Systematic Literature Review [0.0]
  We conducted a review of articles that investigate the integration of machine learning and systematic reasoning. The objective was to identify techniques that incorporate inductive reasoning (performed by us) into artificial intelligence systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-15T14:56:04Z)
• Multi-turn Dialogue Comprehension from a Topic-aware Perspective [70.37126956655985]
  This paper proposes to model multi-turn dialogues from a topic-aware perspective. We use a dialogue segmentation algorithm to split a dialogue passage into topic-concentrated fragments in an unsupervised way. We also present a novel model, Topic-Aware Dual-Attention Matching (TADAM) Network, which takes topic segments as processing elements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-09-18T11:03:55Z)
• Intersectional Inquiry, on the Ground and in the Algorithm [1.0923877073891446]
  We argue that methods in this field must account for intersections of social difference, such as race, class, ethnicity, culture, and disability. We consider the complexities of bringing together computational and qualitative methods in an intersectional methodological approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-29T23:43:58Z)
• Re-mine, Learn and Reason: Exploring the Cross-modal Semantic Correlations for Language-guided HOI detection [57.13665112065285]
  Human-Object Interaction (HOI) detection is a challenging computer vision task. We present a framework that enhances HOI detection by incorporating structured text knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-25T14:20:52Z)
• DiPlomat: A Dialogue Dataset for Situated Pragmatic Reasoning [89.92601337474954]
  Pragmatic reasoning plays a pivotal role in deciphering implicit meanings that frequently arise in real-life conversations. We introduce a novel challenge, DiPlomat, aiming at benchmarking machines' capabilities on pragmatic reasoning and situated conversational understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-15T10:41:23Z)
• Theme and Topic: How Qualitative Research and Topic Modeling Can Be Brought Together [5.862480696321741]
  Probabilistic topic modelling is a machine learning approach that is also based around the analysis of text. We use this analogy as the basis for our Theme and Topic system. This is an example of a more general approach to the design of interactive machine learning systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-03T04:21:08Z)
• Probing Task-Oriented Dialogue Representation from Language Models [106.02947285212132]
  This paper investigates pre-trained language models to find out which model intrinsically carries the most informative representation for task-oriented dialogue tasks. We fine-tune a feed-forward layer as the classifier probe on top of a fixed pre-trained language model with annotated labels in a supervised way.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-26T21:34:39Z)
• Counterfactual Explanations for Machine Learning: A Review [5.908471365011942]
  We review and categorize research on counterfactual explanations in machine learning. Modern approaches to counterfactual explainability in machine learning draw connections to the established legal doctrine in many countries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-10-20T20:08:42Z)
• Topic-Aware Multi-turn Dialogue Modeling [91.52820664879432]
  This paper presents a novel solution for multi-turn dialogue modeling, which segments and extracts topic-aware utterances in an unsupervised way. Our topic-aware modeling is implemented by a newly proposed unsupervised topic-aware segmentation algorithm and Topic-Aware Dual-attention Matching (TADAM) Network.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-26T08:43:06Z)
• End-to-End Models for the Analysis of System 1 and System 2 Interactions based on Eye-Tracking Data [99.00520068425759]
  We propose a computational method, within a modified visual version of the well-known Stroop test, for the identification of different tasks and potential conflicts events. A statistical analysis shows that the selected variables can characterize the variation of attentive load within different scenarios. We show that Machine Learning techniques allow to distinguish between different tasks with a good classification accuracy.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-03T17:46:13Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.