Improved bounds for testing low stabilizer complexity states

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2410.24202v2
• Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2024 21:17:33 GMT
• Title: Improved bounds for testing low stabilizer complexity states
• Authors: Saeed Mehraban, Mehrdad Tahmasbi,
• Abstract summary: We improve the state-of-the-art parameters for the tolerant testing of stabilizer states. We also study the problem of testing low stabilizer rank states.
• Score: 6.169364905804677
• License:
• Abstract: Stabilizer states are fundamental families of quantum states with crucial applications such as error correction, quantum computation, and simulation of quantum circuits. In this paper, we study the problem of testing how close or far a quantum state is to a stabilizer state. We make two contributions: First, we improve the state-of-the-art parameters for the tolerant testing of stabilizer states. In particular, we show that there is an efficient quantum primitive to distinguish if the maximum fidelity of a quantum state with a stabilizer state is $\geq \epsilon_1$ or $\leq \epsilon_2$, given one of them is the case, provided that $\epsilon_2 \leq \epsilon_1^{O(1)}$. This result improves the parameters in the previous work [AD24] which assumed $\epsilon_2 \leq e^{- 1/\epsilon^{O(1)}_1}$ [AD24]. Our proof technique extends the toolsets developed in [AD24] by applying a random Clifford map which balances the characteristic function of a quantum state, enabling the use of standard proof techniques from higher-order Fourier analysis for Boolean functions [HHL19, Sam07], where improved testing bounds are available. Second, we study the problem of testing low stabilizer rank states. We show that if for an infinite family of quantum states stabilizer rank is lower than a constant independent of system size, then stabilizer fidelity is lower bounded by an absolute constant. Using a result of [GIKL22], one of the implications of this result is that low approximate stabilizer rank states are not pseudo-random. At the same time our work was completed and posted on arXiv, two other groups [BvDH24, ABD24] independently achieved similar exponential to polynomial improvements for tolerant testing, each using a different approach.

Related papers

• Non-stabilizerness of Neural Quantum States [41.94295877935867]
  We introduce a methodology to estimate non-stabilizerness or "magic", a key resource for quantum complexity, with Neural Quantum States (NQS) We study the magic content in an ensemble of random NQS, demonstrating that neural network parametrizations of the wave function capture finite non-stabilizerness besides large entanglement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-13T19:14:15Z)
• General detectability measure [53.64687146666141]
  Distinguishing resource states from resource-free states is a fundamental task in quantum information. We derived the optimal exponential decay rate of the failure probability for detecting a given $n$-tensor product state.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-16T05:39:22Z)
• Single-copy stabilizer testing [0.0]
  We consider the problem of testing whether an unknown $n$-qubit quantum state $|psirangle$ is a stabilizer state. We give an algorithm solving this problem using $O(n)$ copies, and conversely prove that $Omega(sqrtn)$ copies are required for any algorithm.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T14:39:47Z)
• Autonomous stabilization with programmable stabilized state [3.5212094612774405]
  Reservoir engineering is a powerful technique to autonomously stabilize a quantum state. We experimentally achieve $84.6%$ and $82.5%$ stabilization fidelity for the odd and even-parity Bell states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-18T03:17:59Z)
• Bases for optimising stabiliser decompositions of quantum states [14.947570152519281]
  We introduce and study the vector space of linear dependencies of $n$-qubit stabiliser states. We construct elegant bases of linear dependencies of constant size three. We use them to explicitly compute the stabiliser extent of states of more qubits than is feasible with existing techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-29T06:30:05Z)
• Dissipative preparation and stabilization of many-body quantum states in a superconducting qutrit array [55.41644538483948]
  We present and analyze a protocol for driven-dissipatively preparing and stabilizing a manifold of quantum manybody entangled states. We perform theoretical modeling of this platform via pulse-level simulations based on physical features of real devices. Our work shows the capacity of driven-dissipative superconducting cQED systems to host robust and self-corrected quantum manybody states.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-03-21T18:02:47Z)
• Discrete Quantum Gaussians and Central Limit Theorem [0.0]
  We study states in discrete-variable (DV) quantum systems. stabilizer states play a role in DV quantum systems similar to the role Gaussian states play in continuous-variable systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-16T17:03:19Z)
• Improved Graph Formalism for Quantum Circuit Simulation [77.34726150561087]
  We show how to efficiently simplify stabilizer states to canonical form. We characterize all linearly dependent triplets, revealing symmetries in the inner products. Using our novel controlled-Pauli $Z$ algorithm, we improve runtime for inner product computation from $O(n3)$ to $O(nd2)$ where $d$ is the maximum degree of the graph.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-09-20T05:56:25Z)
• On the properties of the asymptotic incompatibility measure in multiparameter quantum estimation [62.997667081978825]
  Incompatibility (AI) is a measure which quantifies the difference between the Holevo and the SLD scalar bounds. We show that the maximum amount of AI is attainable only for quantum statistical models characterized by a purity larger than $mu_sf min = 1/(d-1)$.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-28T15:16:37Z)
• Bose-Einstein condensate soliton qubit states for metrological applications [58.720142291102135]
  We propose novel quantum metrology applications with two soliton qubit states. Phase space analysis, in terms of population imbalance - phase difference variables, is also performed to demonstrate macroscopic quantum self-trapping regimes.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-26T09:05:06Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.