Quantifying calibration error in modern neural networks through evidence based theory

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.00265v1
• Date: Thu, 31 Oct 2024 23:54:21 GMT
• Title: Quantifying calibration error in modern neural networks through evidence based theory
• Authors: Koffi Ismael Ouattara,
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces a novel framework for quantifying the trustworthiness of neural networks by incorporating subjective logic into the evaluation of Expected Error (ECE) We demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach through experiments on MNIST and CIFAR-10 datasets where post-calibration results indicate improved trustworthiness. The proposed framework offers a more interpretable and nuanced assessment of AI models, with potential applications in sensitive domains such as healthcare and autonomous systems.
• Score: 0.0
• License:
• Abstract: Trustworthiness in neural networks is crucial for their deployment in critical applications, where reliability, confidence, and uncertainty play pivotal roles in decision-making. Traditional performance metrics such as accuracy and precision fail to capture these aspects, particularly in cases where models exhibit overconfidence. To address these limitations, this paper introduces a novel framework for quantifying the trustworthiness of neural networks by incorporating subjective logic into the evaluation of Expected Calibration Error (ECE). This method provides a comprehensive measure of trust, disbelief, and uncertainty by clustering predicted probabilities and fusing opinions using appropriate fusion operators. We demonstrate the effectiveness of this approach through experiments on MNIST and CIFAR-10 datasets, where post-calibration results indicate improved trustworthiness. The proposed framework offers a more interpretable and nuanced assessment of AI models, with potential applications in sensitive domains such as healthcare and autonomous systems.

Related papers

• Explainability through uncertainty: Trustworthy decision-making with neural networks [1.104960878651584]
  Uncertainty is a key feature of any machine learning model. It is particularly important in neural networks, which tend to be overconfident. Uncertainty as XAI improves the model's trustworthiness in downstream decision-making tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-15T10:22:48Z)
• Revisiting Confidence Estimation: Towards Reliable Failure Prediction [53.79160907725975]
  We find a general, widely existing but actually-neglected phenomenon that most confidence estimation methods are harmful for detecting misclassification errors. We propose to enlarge the confidence gap by finding flat minima, which yields state-of-the-art failure prediction performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-05T11:44:14Z)
• Self-Improving Interference Management Based on Deep Learning With Uncertainty Quantification [10.403513606082067]
  This paper presents a self-improving interference management framework tailored for wireless communications. Our approach addresses the computational challenges inherent in traditional optimization-based algorithms. A breakthrough of our framework is its acknowledgment of the limitations inherent in data-driven models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-24T03:28:48Z)
• Tractable Function-Space Variational Inference in Bayesian Neural Networks [72.97620734290139]
  A popular approach for estimating the predictive uncertainty of neural networks is to define a prior distribution over the network parameters. We propose a scalable function-space variational inference method that allows incorporating prior information. We show that the proposed method leads to state-of-the-art uncertainty estimation and predictive performance on a range of prediction tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-28T18:33:26Z)
• Approaching Neural Network Uncertainty Realism [53.308409014122816]
  Quantifying or at least upper-bounding uncertainties is vital for safety-critical systems such as autonomous vehicles. We evaluate uncertainty realism -- a strict quality criterion -- with a Mahalanobis distance-based statistical test. We adopt it to the automotive domain and show that it significantly improves uncertainty realism compared to a plain encoder-decoder model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-08T11:56:12Z)
• Towards Trustworthy Predictions from Deep Neural Networks with Fast Adversarial Calibration [2.8935588665357077]
  We propose an efficient yet general modelling approach for obtaining well-calibrated, trustworthy probabilities for samples obtained after a domain shift. We introduce a new training strategy combining an entropy-encouraging loss term with an adversarial calibration loss term and demonstrate that this results in well-calibrated and technically trustworthy predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-20T13:39:29Z)
• Trust but Verify: Assigning Prediction Credibility by Counterfactual Constrained Learning [123.3472310767721]
  Prediction credibility measures are fundamental in statistics and machine learning. These measures should account for the wide variety of models used in practice. The framework developed in this work expresses the credibility as a risk-fit trade-off.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-24T19:52:38Z)
• Accurate and Robust Feature Importance Estimation under Distribution Shifts [49.58991359544005]
  PRoFILE is a novel feature importance estimation method. We show significant improvements over state-of-the-art approaches, both in terms of fidelity and robustness.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-30T05:29:01Z)
• Confidence-Aware Learning for Deep Neural Networks [4.9812879456945]
  We propose a method of training deep neural networks with a novel loss function, named Correctness Ranking Loss. It regularizes class probabilities explicitly to be better confidence estimates in terms of ordinal ranking according to confidence. It has almost the same computational costs for training as conventional deep classifiers and outputs reliable predictions by a single inference.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-07-03T02:00:35Z)
• Unlabelled Data Improves Bayesian Uncertainty Calibration under Covariate Shift [100.52588638477862]
  We develop an approximate Bayesian inference scheme based on posterior regularisation. We demonstrate the utility of our method in the context of transferring prognostic models of prostate cancer across globally diverse populations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-06-26T13:50:19Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.