Beyond Utility: Evaluating LLM as Recommender

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.00331v1
• Date: Fri, 01 Nov 2024 03:09:28 GMT
• Title: Beyond Utility: Evaluating LLM as Recommender
• Authors: Chumeng Jiang, Jiayin Wang, Weizhi Ma, Charles L. A. Clarke, Shuai Wang, Chuhan Wu, Min Zhang,
• Abstract summary: We explore four new evaluation dimensions and propose a multidimensional evaluation framework. New evaluation dimensions include: history length sensitivity, candidate position bias, 3) generation-involved performance, and 4) hallucinations. Using this multidimensional evaluation framework, along with traditional aspects, we evaluate the performance of seven LLM-based recommenders.
• Score: 47.97889161958022
• License:
• Abstract: With the rapid development of Large Language Models (LLMs), recent studies employed LLMs as recommenders to provide personalized information services for distinct users. Despite efforts to improve the accuracy of LLM-based recommendation models, relatively little attention is paid to beyond-utility dimensions. Moreover, there are unique evaluation aspects of LLM-based recommendation models, which have been largely ignored. To bridge this gap, we explore four new evaluation dimensions and propose a multidimensional evaluation framework. The new evaluation dimensions include: 1) history length sensitivity, 2) candidate position bias, 3) generation-involved performance, and 4) hallucinations. All four dimensions have the potential to impact performance, but are largely unnecessary for consideration in traditional systems. Using this multidimensional evaluation framework, along with traditional aspects, we evaluate the performance of seven LLM-based recommenders, with three prompting strategies, comparing them with six traditional models on both ranking and re-ranking tasks on four datasets. We find that LLMs excel at handling tasks with prior knowledge and shorter input histories in the ranking setting, and perform better in the re-ranking setting, beating traditional models across multiple dimensions. However, LLMs exhibit substantial candidate position bias issues, and some models hallucinate non-existent items much more often than others. We intend our evaluation framework and observations to benefit future research on the use of LLMs as recommenders. The code and data are available at https://github.com/JiangDeccc/EvaLLMasRecommender.

Related papers

• MME-Survey: A Comprehensive Survey on Evaluation of Multimodal LLMs [97.94579295913606]
  Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) have garnered increased attention from both industry and academia. In the development process, evaluation is critical since it provides intuitive feedback and guidance on improving models. This work aims to offer researchers an easy grasp of how to effectively evaluate MLLMs according to different needs and to inspire better evaluation methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-22T18:59:54Z)
• HLLM: Enhancing Sequential Recommendations via Hierarchical Large Language Models for Item and User Modeling [21.495443162191332]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have achieved remarkable success in various fields, prompting several studies to explore their potential in recommendation systems. We propose a novel Hierarchical Large Language Model (HLLM) architecture designed to enhance sequential recommendation systems. HLLM achieves excellent scalability, with the largest configuration utilizing 7B parameters for both item feature extraction and user interest modeling.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-19T13:03:07Z)
• Lifelong Personalized Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Models for Recommendation [50.837277466987345]
  We focus on the field of large language models (LLMs) for recommendation. We propose RecLoRA, which incorporates a Personalized LoRA module that maintains independent LoRAs for different users. We also design a Few2Many Learning Strategy, using a conventional recommendation model as a lens to magnify small training spaces to full spaces.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-07T04:20:28Z)
• RepEval: Effective Text Evaluation with LLM Representation [55.26340302485898]
  RepEval is a metric that leverages the projection of Large Language Models (LLMs) representations for evaluation. Our work underscores the richness of information regarding text quality embedded within LLM representations, offering insights for the development of new metrics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-30T13:50:55Z)
• PRE: A Peer Review Based Large Language Model Evaluator [14.585292530642603]
  Existing paradigms rely on either human annotators or model-based evaluators to evaluate the performance of LLMs. We propose a novel framework that can automatically evaluate LLMs through a peer-review process.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-28T12:33:14Z)
• A Survey on Large Language Models for Recommendation [77.91673633328148]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as powerful tools in the field of Natural Language Processing (NLP) This survey presents a taxonomy that categorizes these models into two major paradigms, respectively Discriminative LLM for Recommendation (DLLM4Rec) and Generative LLM for Recommendation (GLLM4Rec)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-31T13:51:26Z)
• Large Language Models are Zero-Shot Rankers for Recommender Systems [76.02500186203929]
  This work aims to investigate the capacity of large language models (LLMs) to act as the ranking model for recommender systems. We show that LLMs have promising zero-shot ranking abilities but struggle to perceive the order of historical interactions. We demonstrate that these issues can be alleviated using specially designed prompting and bootstrapping strategies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-15T17:57:39Z)
• PALR: Personalization Aware LLMs for Recommendation [7.407353565043918]
  PALR aims to combine user history behaviors (such as clicks, purchases, ratings, etc.) with large language models (LLMs) to generate user preferred items. Our solution outperforms state-of-the-art models on various sequential recommendation tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-12T17:21:33Z)
• Do LLMs Understand User Preferences? Evaluating LLMs On User Rating Prediction [15.793007223588672]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated exceptional capabilities in generalizing to new tasks in a zero-shot or few-shot manner. We investigate various LLMs in different sizes, ranging from 250M to 540B parameters and evaluate their performance in zero-shot, few-shot, and fine-tuning scenarios.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-10T21:43:42Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.