Autoformulation of Mathematical Optimization Models Using LLMs
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.01679v1
- Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2024 20:41:38 GMT
- Title: Autoformulation of Mathematical Optimization Models Using LLMs
- Authors: Nicolás Astorga, Tennison Liu, Yuanzhang Xiao, Mihaela van der Schaar,
- Abstract summary: We develop an automated approach to creating optimization models from natural language descriptions for commercial solvers.
We identify the three core challenges of autoformulation: (1) defining the vast, problem-dependent hypothesis space, (2) efficiently searching this space under uncertainty, and (3) evaluating formulation correctness.
- Score: 50.030647274271516
- License:
- Abstract: Mathematical optimization is fundamental to decision-making across diverse domains, from operations research to healthcare. Yet, translating real-world problems into optimization models remains a formidable challenge, often demanding specialized expertise. This paper formally introduces the concept of $\textbf{autoformulation}$ -- an automated approach to creating optimization models from natural language descriptions for commercial solvers. We identify the three core challenges of autoformulation: (1) defining the vast, problem-dependent hypothesis space, (2) efficiently searching this space under uncertainty, and (3) evaluating formulation correctness (ensuring a formulation accurately represents the problem). To address these challenges, we introduce a novel method leveraging $\textit{Large Language Models}$ (LLMs) within a $\textit{Monte-Carlo Tree Search}$ framework. This approach systematically explores the space of possible formulations by exploiting the hierarchical nature of optimization modeling. LLMs serve two key roles: as dynamic formulation hypothesis generators and as evaluators of formulation correctness. To enhance search efficiency, we introduce a pruning technique to remove trivially equivalent formulations. Empirical evaluations across benchmarks containing linear and mixed-integer programming problems demonstrate our method's superior performance. Additionally, we observe significant efficiency gains from employing LLMs for correctness evaluation and from our pruning techniques.
Related papers
- LLMOPT: Learning to Define and Solve General Optimization Problems from Scratch [16.174567164068037]
We propose a unified learning-based framework called LLMOPT to boost optimization generalization.
LLMOPT constructs the introduced five-element formulation as a universal model for learning to define diverse optimization problem types.
We evaluate the optimization generalization ability of LLMOPT and compared methods across six real-world datasets.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-17T04:37:37Z) - Learning Joint Models of Prediction and Optimization [56.04498536842065]
Predict-Then-Then framework uses machine learning models to predict unknown parameters of an optimization problem from features before solving.
This paper proposes an alternative method, in which optimal solutions are learned directly from the observable features by joint predictive models.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-07T19:52:14Z) - Search-Based LLMs for Code Optimization [16.843870288512363]
Code written by developers usually suffers from efficiency problems and contain various performance bugs.
Recent work regards the task as a sequence generation problem, and resorts to deep learning (DL) techniques such as large language models (LLMs)
We propose a search-based LLMs framework named SBLLM that enables iterative refinement and discovery of improved optimization methods.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-08-22T06:59:46Z) - Solving General Natural-Language-Description Optimization Problems with Large Language Models [34.50671063271608]
We propose a novel framework called OptLLM that augments LLMs with external solvers.
OptLLM accepts user queries in natural language, convert them into mathematical formulations and programming codes, and calls the solvers to calculate the results.
Some features of OptLLM framework have been available for trial since June 2023.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-07-09T07:11:10Z) - MindStar: Enhancing Math Reasoning in Pre-trained LLMs at Inference Time [51.5039731721706]
MindStar is a purely inference-based searching method for large language models.
It formulates reasoning tasks as searching problems and proposes two search ideas to identify the optimal reasoning paths.
It significantly enhances the reasoning abilities of open-source models, such as Llama-2-13B and Mistral-7B, and achieves comparable performance to GPT-3.5 and Grok-1.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-25T15:07:33Z) - End-to-End Learning for Fair Multiobjective Optimization Under
Uncertainty [55.04219793298687]
The Predict-Then-Forecast (PtO) paradigm in machine learning aims to maximize downstream decision quality.
This paper extends the PtO methodology to optimization problems with nondifferentiable Ordered Weighted Averaging (OWA) objectives.
It shows how optimization of OWA functions can be effectively integrated with parametric prediction for fair and robust optimization under uncertainty.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-12T16:33:35Z) - AI-Copilot for Business Optimisation: A Framework and A Case Study in
Production Scheduling [3.522755287096529]
We propose an AI-Copilot for business optimisation problem formulation.
For token limitations, we introduce modularization and prompt engineering techniques.
We design performance evaluation metrics that are better suited for assessing the accuracy and quality of problem formulations.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-09-22T23:45:21Z) - SatLM: Satisfiability-Aided Language Models Using Declarative Prompting [68.40726892904286]
We propose a new satisfiability-aided language modeling (SatLM) approach for improving the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs)
We use an LLM to generate a declarative task specification rather than an imperative program and leverage an off-the-shelf automated theorem prover to derive the final answer.
We evaluate SATLM on 8 different datasets and show that it consistently outperforms program-aided LMs in the imperative paradigm.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-16T17:55:51Z) - Backpropagation of Unrolled Solvers with Folded Optimization [55.04219793298687]
The integration of constrained optimization models as components in deep networks has led to promising advances on many specialized learning tasks.
One typical strategy is algorithm unrolling, which relies on automatic differentiation through the operations of an iterative solver.
This paper provides theoretical insights into the backward pass of unrolled optimization, leading to a system for generating efficiently solvable analytical models of backpropagation.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-01-28T01:50:42Z) - Efficient Learning of Decision-Making Models: A Penalty Block Coordinate
Descent Algorithm for Data-Driven Inverse Optimization [12.610576072466895]
We consider the inverse problem where we use prior decision data to uncover the underlying decision-making process.
This statistical learning problem is referred to as data-driven inverse optimization.
We propose an efficient block coordinate descent-based algorithm to solve large problem instances.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2022-10-27T12:52:56Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.