SPES: Spectrogram Perturbation for Explainable Speech-to-Text Generation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.01710v1
• Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2024 23:02:30 GMT
• Title: SPES: Spectrogram Perturbation for Explainable Speech-to-Text Generation
• Authors: Dennis Fucci, Marco Gaido, Beatrice Savoldi, Matteo Negri, Mauro Cettolo, Luisa Bentivogli,
• Abstract summary: We introduce Spectrogram Perturbation for Explainable Speech-to-text Generation (SPES) SPES provides explanations for each predicted token based on both the input spectrogram and the previously generated tokens. Extensive evaluation on speech recognition and translation demonstrates that SPES generates explanations that are faithful and plausible to humans.
• Score: 19.833055725825883
• License:
• Abstract: Spurred by the demand for interpretable models, research on eXplainable AI for language technologies has experienced significant growth, with feature attribution methods emerging as a cornerstone of this progress. While prior work in NLP explored such methods for classification tasks and textual applications, explainability intersecting generation and speech is lagging, with existing techniques failing to account for the autoregressive nature of state-of-the-art models and to provide fine-grained, phonetically meaningful explanations. We address this gap by introducing Spectrogram Perturbation for Explainable Speech-to-text Generation (SPES), a feature attribution technique applicable to sequence generation tasks with autoregressive models. SPES provides explanations for each predicted token based on both the input spectrogram and the previously generated tokens. Extensive evaluation on speech recognition and translation demonstrates that SPES generates explanations that are faithful and plausible to humans.

Related papers

• TAGExplainer: Narrating Graph Explanations for Text-Attributed Graph Learning Models [14.367754016281934]
  This paper presents TAGExplainer, the first method designed to generate natural language explanations for TAG learning. To address the lack of annotated ground truth explanations in real-world scenarios, we propose first generating pseudo-labels that capture the model's decisions from saliency-based explanations. The high-quality pseudo-labels are finally utilized to train an end-to-end explanation generator model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-20T03:55:46Z)
• DeSTA: Enhancing Speech Language Models through Descriptive Speech-Text Alignment [82.86363991170546]
  We propose a Descriptive Speech-Text Alignment approach that leverages speech captioning to bridge the gap between speech and text modalities. Our model demonstrates superior performance on the Dynamic-SUPERB benchmark, particularly in generalizing to unseen tasks. These findings highlight the potential to reshape instruction-following SLMs by incorporating descriptive rich, speech captions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-27T03:52:35Z)
• Challenges and Opportunities in Text Generation Explainability [12.089513278445704]
  This paper outlines 17 challenges categorized into three groups that arise during the development and assessment of explainability methods. These challenges encompass issues concerning tokenization, defining explanation similarity, determining token importance and prediction change metrics, the level of human intervention required, and the creation of suitable test datasets. The paper illustrates how these challenges can be intertwined, showcasing new opportunities for the community.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-14T09:44:52Z)
• Explaining Text Similarity in Transformer Models [52.571158418102584]
  Recent advances in explainable AI have made it possible to mitigate limitations by leveraging improved explanations for Transformers. We use BiLRP, an extension developed for computing second-order explanations in bilinear similarity models, to investigate which feature interactions drive similarity in NLP models. Our findings contribute to a deeper understanding of different semantic similarity tasks and models, highlighting how novel explainable AI methods enable in-depth analyses and corpus-level insights.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T17:11:31Z)
• Explaining Hate Speech Classification with Model Agnostic Methods [0.9990687944474738]
  The research goal of this paper is to bridge the gap between hate speech prediction and the explanations generated by the system to support its decision. This has been achieved by first predicting the classification of a text and then providing a posthoc, model agnostic and surrogate interpretability approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-30T19:52:56Z)
• An Exploration of Prompt Tuning on Generative Spoken Language Model for Speech Processing Tasks [112.1942546460814]
  We report the first exploration of the prompt tuning paradigm for speech processing tasks based on Generative Spoken Language Model (GSLM) Experiment results show that the prompt tuning technique achieves competitive performance in speech classification tasks with fewer trainable parameters than fine-tuning specialized downstream models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-31T03:26:55Z)
• Direct speech-to-speech translation with discrete units [64.19830539866072]
  We present a direct speech-to-speech translation (S2ST) model that translates speech from one language to speech in another language without relying on intermediate text generation. We propose to predict the self-supervised discrete representations learned from an unlabeled speech corpus instead. When target text transcripts are available, we design a multitask learning framework with joint speech and text training that enables the model to generate dual mode output (speech and text) simultaneously in the same inference pass.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-07-12T17:40:43Z)
• Lexically-constrained Text Generation through Commonsense Knowledge Extraction and Injection [62.071938098215085]
  We focus on the Commongen benchmark, wherein the aim is to generate a plausible sentence for a given set of input concepts. We propose strategies for enhancing the semantic correctness of the generated text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-19T23:23:40Z)
• Infusing Finetuning with Semantic Dependencies [62.37697048781823]
  We show that, unlike syntax, semantics is not brought to the surface by today's pretrained models. We then use convolutional graph encoders to explicitly incorporate semantic parses into task-specific finetuning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-12-10T01:27:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.