XAI-FUNGI: Dataset resulting from the user study on comprehensibility of explainable AI algorithms

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.02419v1
• Date: Mon, 21 Oct 2024 11:37:58 GMT
• Title: XAI-FUNGI: Dataset resulting from the user study on comprehensibility of explainable AI algorithms
• Authors: Szymon Bobek, Paloma Korycińska, Monika Krakowska, Maciej Mozolewski, Dorota Rak, Magdalena Zych, Magdalena Wójcik, Grzegorz J. Nalepa,
• Abstract summary: This paper introduces a dataset that is the result of a user study on the comprehensibility of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) algorithms. The study participants were recruited from 149 candidates to form three groups representing experts in the domain of mycology (DE) The main part of the dataset contains 39 transcripts of interviews during which participants were asked to complete a series of tasks and questions related to the interpretation of decisions of a machine learning model trained to distinguish between edible and inedible mushrooms.
• Score: 5.775094401949666
• License:
• Abstract: This paper introduces a dataset that is the result of a user study on the comprehensibility of explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) algorithms. The study participants were recruited from 149 candidates to form three groups representing experts in the domain of mycology (DE), students with a data science and visualization background (IT) and students from social sciences and humanities (SSH). The main part of the dataset contains 39 transcripts of interviews during which participants were asked to complete a series of tasks and questions related to the interpretation of explanations of decisions of a machine learning model trained to distinguish between edible and inedible mushrooms. The transcripts were complemented with additional data that includes visualizations of explanations presented to the user, results from thematic analysis, recommendations of improvements of explanations provided by the participants, and the initial survey results that allow to determine the domain knowledge of the participant and data analysis literacy. The transcripts were manually tagged to allow for automatic matching between the text and other data related to particular fragments. In the advent of the area of rapid development of XAI techniques, the need for a multidisciplinary qualitative evaluation of explainability is one of the emerging topics in the community. Our dataset allows not only to reproduce the study we conducted, but also to open a wide range of possibilities for the analysis of the material we gathered.

Related papers

• SciER: An Entity and Relation Extraction Dataset for Datasets, Methods, and Tasks in Scientific Documents [49.54155332262579]
  We release a new entity and relation extraction dataset for entities related to datasets, methods, and tasks in scientific articles. Our dataset contains 106 manually annotated full-text scientific publications with over 24k entities and 12k relations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-28T15:56:49Z)
• User-centric evaluation of explainability of AI with and for humans: a comprehensive empirical study [5.775094401949666]
  This study is located in the Human-Centered Artificial Intelligence (HCAI) It focuses on the results of a user-centered assessment of commonly used eXplainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI) algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T12:32:39Z)
• Data Analysis in the Era of Generative AI [56.44807642944589]
  This paper explores the potential of AI-powered tools to reshape data analysis, focusing on design considerations and challenges. We explore how the emergence of large language and multimodal models offers new opportunities to enhance various stages of data analysis workflow. We then examine human-centered design principles that facilitate intuitive interactions, build user trust, and streamline the AI-assisted analysis workflow across multiple apps.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-27T06:31:03Z)
• Knowledge-Aware Reasoning over Multimodal Semi-structured Tables [85.24395216111462]
  This study investigates whether current AI models can perform knowledge-aware reasoning on multimodal structured data. We introduce MMTabQA, a new dataset designed for this purpose. Our experiments highlight substantial challenges for current AI models in effectively integrating and interpreting multiple text and image inputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-25T15:17:43Z)
• Gradient based Feature Attribution in Explainable AI: A Technical Review [13.848675695545909]
  Surge in black-box AI models has prompted the need to explain the internal mechanism and justify their reliability. gradient based explanations can be directly adopted for neural network models. We introduce both human and quantitative evaluations to measure algorithm performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-15T15:49:31Z)
• InfoLossQA: Characterizing and Recovering Information Loss in Text Simplification [60.10193972862099]
  This work proposes a framework to characterize and recover simplification-induced information loss in form of question-and-answer pairs. QA pairs are designed to help readers deepen their knowledge of a text.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-29T19:00:01Z)
• Towards Explainable Artificial Intelligence (XAI): A Data Mining Perspective [35.620874971064765]
  This work takes a "data-centric" view, examining how data collection, processing, and analysis contribute to explainable AI (XAI) We categorize existing work into three categories subject to their purposes: interpretations of deep models, influences of training data, and insights of domain knowledge. Specifically, we distill XAI methodologies into data mining operations on training and testing data across modalities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-09T06:27:09Z)
• FunnyBirds: A Synthetic Vision Dataset for a Part-Based Analysis of Explainable AI Methods [15.073405675079558]
  XAI inherently lacks ground-truth explanations, making its automatic evaluation an unsolved problem. We propose a novel synthetic vision dataset, named FunnyBirds, and accompanying automatic evaluation protocols. Using our tools, we report results for 24 different combinations of neural models and XAI methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-08-11T17:29:02Z)
• Explaining Explainability: Towards Deeper Actionable Insights into Deep Learning through Second-order Explainability [70.60433013657693]
  Second-order explainable AI (SOXAI) was recently proposed to extend explainable AI (XAI) from the instance level to the dataset level. We demonstrate for the first time, via example classification and segmentation cases, that eliminating irrelevant concepts from the training set based on actionable insights from SOXAI can enhance a model's performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-14T23:24:01Z)
• Qualitative Investigation in Explainable Artificial Intelligence: A Bit More Insight from Social Science [0.5801044612920815]
  We present a focused analysis of user studies in explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) We draw on social science corpora to suggest ways for improving the rigor of studies where XAI researchers use observations, interviews, focus groups, and/or questionnaires to capture qualitative data. The results of our analysis support calls from others in the XAI community advocating for collaboration with experts from social disciplines to bolster rigor and effectiveness in user studies.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-13T21:02:16Z)
• ORB: An Open Reading Benchmark for Comprehensive Evaluation of Machine Reading Comprehension [53.037401638264235]
  We present an evaluation server, ORB, that reports performance on seven diverse reading comprehension datasets. The evaluation server places no restrictions on how models are trained, so it is a suitable test bed for exploring training paradigms and representation learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-12-29T07:27:23Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.