"It's a conversation, not a quiz": A Risk Taxonomy and Reflection Tool for LLM Adoption in Public Health

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.02594v1
• Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2024 20:35:10 GMT
• Title: "It's a conversation, not a quiz": A Risk Taxonomy and Reflection Tool for LLM Adoption in Public Health
• Authors: Jiawei Zhou, Amy Z. Chen, Darshi Shah, Laura Schwab Reese, Munmun De Choudhury,
• Abstract summary: We conduct focus groups with health professionals and health issue experiencers to unpack their concerns. We synthesize participants' perspectives into a risk taxonomy. This taxonomy highlights four dimensions of risk in individual behaviors, human-centered care, information ecosystem, and technology accountability.
• Score: 16.418366314356184
• License:
• Abstract: Recent breakthroughs in large language models (LLMs) have generated both interest and concern about their potential adoption as accessible information sources or communication tools across different domains. In public health -- where stakes are high and impacts extend across populations -- adopting LLMs poses unique challenges that require thorough evaluation. However, structured approaches for assessing potential risks in public health remain under-explored. To address this gap, we conducted focus groups with health professionals and health issue experiencers to unpack their concerns, situated across three distinct and critical public health issues that demand high-quality information: vaccines, opioid use disorder, and intimate partner violence. We synthesize participants' perspectives into a risk taxonomy, distinguishing and contextualizing the potential harms LLMs may introduce when positioned alongside traditional health communication. This taxonomy highlights four dimensions of risk in individual behaviors, human-centered care, information ecosystem, and technology accountability. For each dimension, we discuss specific risks and example reflection questions to help practitioners adopt a risk-reflexive approach. This work offers a shared vocabulary and reflection tool for experts in both computing and public health to collaboratively anticipate, evaluate, and mitigate risks in deciding when to employ LLM capabilities (or not) and how to mitigate harm when they are used.

Related papers

• Persuasion with Large Language Models: a Survey [49.86930318312291]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have created new disruptive possibilities for persuasive communication. In areas such as politics, marketing, public health, e-commerce, and charitable giving, such LLM Systems have already achieved human-level or even super-human persuasiveness. Our survey suggests that the current and future potential of LLM-based persuasion poses profound ethical and societal risks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-11T10:05:52Z)
• Quantifying Risk Propensities of Large Language Models: Ethical Focus and Bias Detection through Role-Play [0.43512163406552007]
  As Large Language Models (LLMs) become more prevalent, concerns about their safety, ethics, and potential biases have risen. This study innovatively applies the Domain-Specific Risk-Taking (DOSPERT) scale from cognitive science to LLMs. We propose a novel Ethical Decision-Making Risk Attitude Scale (EDRAS) to assess LLMs' ethical risk attitudes in depth.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-26T15:55:21Z)
• Risks and NLP Design: A Case Study on Procedural Document QA [52.557503571760215]
  We argue that clearer assessments of risks and harms to users will be possible when we specialize the analysis to more concrete applications and their plausible users. We conduct a risk-oriented error analysis that could then inform the design of a future system to be deployed with lower risk of harm and better performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-16T17:23:43Z)
• A Toolbox for Surfacing Health Equity Harms and Biases in Large Language Models [20.11590976578911]
  Large language models (LLMs) hold promise to serve complex health information needs but also have the potential to introduce harm and exacerbate health disparities. Reliably evaluating equity-related model failures is a critical step toward developing systems that promote health equity. We present resources and methodologies for surfacing biases with potential to precipitate equity-related harms in long-form, LLM-generated answers to medical questions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-18T17:56:37Z)
• Prioritizing Safeguarding Over Autonomy: Risks of LLM Agents for Science [65.77763092833348]
  Intelligent agents powered by large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated substantial promise in autonomously conducting experiments and facilitating scientific discoveries across various disciplines. While their capabilities are promising, these agents also introduce novel vulnerabilities that demand careful consideration for safety. This paper conducts a thorough examination of vulnerabilities in LLM-based agents within scientific domains, shedding light on potential risks associated with their misuse and emphasizing the need for safety measures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T18:54:07Z)
• Towards Mitigating Hallucination in Large Language Models via Self-Reflection [63.2543947174318]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown promise for generative and knowledge-intensive tasks including question-answering (QA) tasks. This paper analyses the phenomenon of hallucination in medical generative QA systems using widely adopted LLMs and datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-10T03:05:44Z)
• Large Language Models in Sport Science & Medicine: Opportunities, Risks and Considerations [1.0152838128195467]
  This paper explores the potential opportunities, risks, and challenges associated with the use of large language models (LLMs) in sports science and medicine. LLMs have the potential to support and augment the knowledge of sports medicine practitioners, make recommendations for personalised training programs, and potentially distribute high-quality information to practitioners in developing countries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-05T21:20:02Z)
• Ethical and social risks of harm from Language Models [22.964941107198023]
  This paper aims to help structure the risk landscape associated with large-scale Language Models (LMs) A wide range of established and anticipated risks are analysed in detail, drawing on multidisciplinary expertise and literature from computer science, linguistics, and social sciences.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-12-08T16:09:48Z)
• Epidemic mitigation by statistical inference from contact tracing data [61.04165571425021]
  We develop Bayesian inference methods to estimate the risk that an individual is infected. We propose to use probabilistic risk estimation in order to optimize testing and quarantining strategies for the control of an epidemic. Our approaches translate into fully distributed algorithms that only require communication between individuals who have recently been in contact.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-20T12:24:45Z)
• COVI White Paper [67.04578448931741]
  Contact tracing is an essential tool to change the course of the Covid-19 pandemic. We present an overview of the rationale, design, ethical considerations and privacy strategy of COVI,' a Covid-19 public peer-to-peer contact tracing and risk awareness mobile application developed in Canada.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-18T07:40:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.