Large Language Models in Sport Science & Medicine: Opportunities, Risks
and Considerations
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2305.03851v1
- Date: Fri, 5 May 2023 21:20:02 GMT
- Title: Large Language Models in Sport Science & Medicine: Opportunities, Risks
and Considerations
- Authors: Mark Connor and Michael O'Neill
- Abstract summary: This paper explores the potential opportunities, risks, and challenges associated with the use of large language models (LLMs) in sports science and medicine.
LLMs have the potential to support and augment the knowledge of sports medicine practitioners, make recommendations for personalised training programs, and potentially distribute high-quality information to practitioners in developing countries.
- Score: 1.0152838128195467
- License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
- Abstract: This paper explores the potential opportunities, risks, and challenges
associated with the use of large language models (LLMs) in sports science and
medicine. LLMs are large neural networks with transformer style architectures
trained on vast amounts of textual data, and typically refined with human
feedback. LLMs can perform a large range of natural language processing tasks.
In sports science and medicine, LLMs have the potential to support and augment
the knowledge of sports medicine practitioners, make recommendations for
personalised training programs, and potentially distribute high-quality
information to practitioners in developing countries. However, there are also
potential risks associated with the use and development of LLMs, including
biases in the dataset used to create the model, the risk of exposing
confidential data, the risk of generating harmful output, and the need to align
these models with human preferences through feedback. Further research is
needed to fully understand the potential applications of LLMs in sports science
and medicine and to ensure that their use is ethical and beneficial to
athletes, clients, patients, practitioners, and the general public.
Related papers
- Persuasion with Large Language Models: a Survey [49.86930318312291]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have created new disruptive possibilities for persuasive communication.
In areas such as politics, marketing, public health, e-commerce, and charitable giving, such LLM Systems have already achieved human-level or even super-human persuasiveness.
Our survey suggests that the current and future potential of LLM-based persuasion poses profound ethical and societal risks.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-11T10:05:52Z) - "It's a conversation, not a quiz": A Risk Taxonomy and Reflection Tool for LLM Adoption in Public Health [16.418366314356184]
We conduct focus groups with health professionals and health issue experiencers to unpack their concerns.
We synthesize participants' perspectives into a risk taxonomy.
This taxonomy highlights four dimensions of risk in individual behaviors, human-centered care, information ecosystem, and technology accountability.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-11-04T20:35:10Z) - Contextual Evaluation of Large Language Models for Classifying Tropical and Infectious Diseases [0.9798965031257411]
We build on an opensource tropical and infectious diseases (TRINDs) dataset, expanding it to include demographic and semantic clinical and consumer augmentations yielding 11000+ prompts.
We evaluate LLM performance on these, comparing generalist and medical LLMs, as well as LLM outcomes to human experts.
We develop a prototype of TRINDs-LM, a research tool that provides a playground to navigate how context impacts LLM outputs for health.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-09-13T21:28:54Z) - Large language models surpass human experts in predicting neuroscience results [60.26891446026707]
Large language models (LLMs) forecast novel results better than human experts.
BrainBench is a benchmark for predicting neuroscience results.
Our approach is not neuroscience-specific and is transferable to other knowledge-intensive endeavors.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-03-04T15:27:59Z) - Rethinking Machine Unlearning for Large Language Models [85.92660644100582]
We explore machine unlearning in the domain of large language models (LLMs)
This initiative aims to eliminate undesirable data influence (e.g., sensitive or illegal information) and the associated model capabilities.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-02-13T20:51:58Z) - EpilepsyLLM: Domain-Specific Large Language Model Fine-tuned with
Epilepsy Medical Knowledge [28.409333447902693]
Large language models (LLMs) achieve remarkable performance in comprehensive and generative ability.
In this work, we focus on the particular disease of Epilepsy with Japanese language and introduce a customized LLM termed as EpilepsyLLM.
The datasets contain knowledge of basic information about disease, common treatment methods and drugs, and important notes in life and work.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-11T13:39:00Z) - Natural Language Programming in Medicine: Administering Evidence Based Clinical Workflows with Autonomous Agents Powered by Generative Large Language Models [29.05425041393475]
Generative Large Language Models (LLMs) hold significant promise in healthcare.
This study assessed the potential of LLMs to function as autonomous agents in a simulated tertiary care medical center.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-01-05T15:09:57Z) - Challenges and Contributing Factors in the Utilization of Large Language
Models (LLMs) [10.039589841455136]
This review explores the issue of domain specificity, where large language models (LLMs) may struggle to provide precise answers to specialized questions within niche fields.
It's suggested to diversify training data, fine-tune models, enhance transparency and interpretability, and incorporate ethics and fairness training.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-20T08:13:36Z) - Redefining Digital Health Interfaces with Large Language Models [69.02059202720073]
Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as general-purpose models with the ability to process complex information.
We show how LLMs can provide a novel interface between clinicians and digital technologies.
We develop a new prognostic tool using automated machine learning.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-10-05T14:18:40Z) - Aligning Large Language Models with Human: A Survey [53.6014921995006]
Large Language Models (LLMs) trained on extensive textual corpora have emerged as leading solutions for a broad array of Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks.
Despite their notable performance, these models are prone to certain limitations such as misunderstanding human instructions, generating potentially biased content, or factually incorrect information.
This survey presents a comprehensive overview of these alignment technologies, including the following aspects.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-24T17:44:58Z) - On the Risk of Misinformation Pollution with Large Language Models [127.1107824751703]
We investigate the potential misuse of modern Large Language Models (LLMs) for generating credible-sounding misinformation.
Our study reveals that LLMs can act as effective misinformation generators, leading to a significant degradation in the performance of Open-Domain Question Answering (ODQA) systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-23T04:10:26Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.