A Comparative Analysis of Counterfactual Explanation Methods for Text Classifiers

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.02643v1
• Date: Mon, 04 Nov 2024 22:01:52 GMT
• Title: A Comparative Analysis of Counterfactual Explanation Methods for Text Classifiers
• Authors: Stephen McAleese, Mark Keane,
• Abstract summary: We evaluate five methods for generating counterfactual explanations for a BERT text classifier. established white-box substitution-based methods are effective at generating valid counterfactuals that change the classifier's output. newer methods based on large language models (LLMs) excel at producing natural and linguistically plausible text counterfactuals.
• Score: 0.0
• License:
• Abstract: Counterfactual explanations can be used to interpret and debug text classifiers by producing minimally altered text inputs that change a classifier's output. In this work, we evaluate five methods for generating counterfactual explanations for a BERT text classifier on two datasets using three evaluation metrics. The results of our experiments suggest that established white-box substitution-based methods are effective at generating valid counterfactuals that change the classifier's output. In contrast, newer methods based on large language models (LLMs) excel at producing natural and linguistically plausible text counterfactuals but often fail to generate valid counterfactuals that alter the classifier's output. Based on these results, we recommend developing new counterfactual explanation methods that combine the strengths of established gradient-based approaches and newer LLM-based techniques to generate high-quality, valid, and plausible text counterfactual explanations.

Related papers

• LLM Critics Help Catch Bugs in Mathematics: Towards a Better Mathematical Verifier with Natural Language Feedback [71.95402654982095]
  We propose Math-Minos, a natural language feedback-enhanced verifier. Our experiments reveal that a small set of natural language feedback can significantly boost the performance of the verifier.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-20T06:42:27Z)
• Prompt Optimization via Adversarial In-Context Learning [51.18075178593142]
  adv-ICL is implemented as a two-player game between a generator and a discriminator. The generator tries to generate realistic enough output to fool the discriminator. We show that adv-ICL results in significant improvements over state-of-the-art prompt optimization techniques.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-05T09:44:45Z)
• Understanding and Mitigating Classification Errors Through Interpretable Token Patterns [58.91023283103762]
  Characterizing errors in easily interpretable terms gives insight into whether a classifier is prone to making systematic errors. We propose to discover those patterns of tokens that distinguish correct and erroneous predictions. We show that our method, Premise, performs well in practice.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-18T00:24:26Z)
• Token Prediction as Implicit Classification to Identify LLM-Generated Text [37.89852204279844]
  This paper introduces a novel approach for identifying the possible large language models (LLMs) involved in text generation. Instead of adding an additional classification layer to a base LM, we reframe the classification task as a next-token prediction task. We utilize the Text-to-Text Transfer Transformer (T5) model as the backbone for our experiments.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-15T06:33:52Z)
• Scalable Learning of Latent Language Structure With Logical Offline Cycle Consistency [71.42261918225773]
  Conceptually, LOCCO can be viewed as a form of self-learning where the semantic being trained is used to generate annotations for unlabeled text. As an added bonus, the annotations produced by LOCCO can be trivially repurposed to train a neural text generation model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-31T16:47:20Z)
• Flexible text generation for counterfactual fairness probing [8.262741696221143]
  A common approach for testing fairness issues in text-based classifiers is through the use of counterfactuals. Existing counterfactual generation methods rely on wordlists or templates, producing simple counterfactuals that don't take into account grammar, context, or subtle sensitive attribute references. In this paper, we introduce a task for generating counterfactuals that overcomes these shortcomings, and demonstrate how large language models (LLMs) can be leveraged to make progress on this task.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-28T05:07:20Z)
• Fooling Explanations in Text Classifiers [42.49606659285249]
  We introduceTextExplanationer (TEF), a novel explanation attack algorithm that alters text input samples imperceptibly. TEF can significantly decrease the correlation between unchanged and perturbed input attributions. We show that TEF perturbations are also effective in scenarios where the target model and explanation method are unknown.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-07T10:58:08Z)
• Classifiers are Better Experts for Controllable Text Generation [63.17266060165098]
  We show that the proposed method significantly outperforms recent PPLM, GeDi, and DExperts on PPL and sentiment accuracy based on the external classifier of generated texts. The same time, it is also easier to implement and tune, and has significantly fewer restrictions and requirements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-15T12:58:35Z)
• Contextualized Perturbation for Textual Adversarial Attack [56.370304308573274]
  Adversarial examples expose the vulnerabilities of natural language processing (NLP) models. This paper presents CLARE, a ContextuaLized AdversaRial Example generation model that produces fluent and grammatical outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-09-16T06:53:15Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.