Toward Cultural Interpretability: A Linguistic Anthropological Framework for Describing and Evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs)

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.05200v1
• Date: Thu, 07 Nov 2024 22:01:50 GMT
• Title: Toward Cultural Interpretability: A Linguistic Anthropological Framework for Describing and Evaluating Large Language Models (LLMs)
• Authors: Graham M. Jones, Shai Satran, Arvind Satyanarayan,
• Abstract summary: This article proposes a new integration of linguistic anthropology and machine learning (ML) We show the theoretical feasibility of a new, conjoint field of inquiry, cultural interpretability (CI) CI emphasizes how the dynamic relationship between language and culture makes contextually sensitive, open-ended conversation possible.
• Score: 13.71024600466761
• License:
• Abstract: This article proposes a new integration of linguistic anthropology and machine learning (ML) around convergent interests in both the underpinnings of language and making language technologies more socially responsible. While linguistic anthropology focuses on interpreting the cultural basis for human language use, the ML field of interpretability is concerned with uncovering the patterns that Large Language Models (LLMs) learn from human verbal behavior. Through the analysis of a conversation between a human user and an LLM-powered chatbot, we demonstrate the theoretical feasibility of a new, conjoint field of inquiry, cultural interpretability (CI). By focusing attention on the communicative competence involved in the way human users and AI chatbots co-produce meaning in the articulatory interface of human-computer interaction, CI emphasizes how the dynamic relationship between language and culture makes contextually sensitive, open-ended conversation possible. We suggest that, by examining how LLMs internally "represent" relationships between language and culture, CI can: (1) provide insight into long-standing linguistic anthropological questions about the patterning of those relationships; and (2) aid model developers and interface designers in improving value alignment between language models and stylistically diverse speakers and culturally diverse speech communities. Our discussion proposes three critical research axes: relativity, variation, and indexicality.

Related papers

• A Taxonomy of Linguistic Expressions That Contribute To Anthropomorphism of Language Technologies [55.99010491370177]
  anthropomorphism is the attribution of human-like qualities to non-human objects or entities. To productively discuss the impacts of anthropomorphism, we need a shared vocabulary for the vast variety of ways that language can bemorphic.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-14T02:43:46Z)
• Exploring Large Language Models on Cross-Cultural Values in Connection with Training Methodology [4.079147243688765]
  Large language models (LLMs) closely interact with humans, and need an intimate understanding of the cultural values of human society. Our analysis shows that LLMs can judge socio-cultural norms similar to humans but less so on social systems and progress. Increasing model size helps a better understanding of social values, but smaller models can be enhanced by using synthetic data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-12-12T00:52:11Z)
• Multilingual Dyadic Interaction Corpus NoXi+J: Toward Understanding Asian-European Non-verbal Cultural Characteristics and their Influences on Engagement [6.984291346424792]
  We conduct a multilingual computational analysis of non-verbal features and investigate their role in engagement prediction. We extracted multimodal non-verbal features, including speech acoustics, facial expressions, backchanneling and gestures. We analyzed the influence of cultural differences in the input features of LSTM models trained to predict engagement for five language datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-09T18:37:34Z)
• Language Model Alignment in Multilingual Trolley Problems [138.5684081822807]
  Building on the Moral Machine experiment, we develop a cross-lingual corpus of moral dilemma vignettes in over 100 languages called MultiTP. Our analysis explores the alignment of 19 different LLMs with human judgments, capturing preferences across six moral dimensions. We discover significant variance in alignment across languages, challenging the assumption of uniform moral reasoning in AI systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-02T14:02:53Z)
• Integrating Emotional and Linguistic Models for Ethical Compliance in Large Language Models [2.5200794639628032]
  This research develops advanced methodologies for Large Language Models (LLMs) to better manage linguistic behaviors related to emotions and ethics. We introduce DIKE, an adversarial framework that enhances the LLMs' ability to internalize and reflect global human values.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-11T19:26:00Z)
• Investigating Cultural Alignment of Large Language Models [10.738300803676655]
  We show that Large Language Models (LLMs) genuinely encapsulate the diverse knowledge adopted by different cultures. We quantify cultural alignment by simulating sociological surveys, comparing model responses to those of actual survey participants as references. We introduce Anthropological Prompting, a novel method leveraging anthropological reasoning to enhance cultural alignment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-20T18:47:28Z)
• Large language models as linguistic simulators and cognitive models in human research [0.0]
  The rise of large language models (LLMs) that generate human-like text has sparked debates over their potential to replace human participants in behavioral and cognitive research. We critically evaluate this replacement perspective to appraise the fundamental utility of language models in psychology and social science. This perspective reframes the role of language models in behavioral and cognitive science, serving as linguistic simulators and cognitive models that shed light on the similarities and differences between machine intelligence and human cognition and thoughts.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-06T23:28:23Z)
• BabySLM: language-acquisition-friendly benchmark of self-supervised spoken language models [56.93604813379634]
  Self-supervised techniques for learning speech representations have been shown to develop linguistic competence from exposure to speech without the need for human labels. We propose a language-acquisition-friendly benchmark to probe spoken language models at the lexical and syntactic levels. We highlight two exciting challenges that need to be addressed for further progress: bridging the gap between text and speech and between clean speech and in-the-wild speech.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-06-02T12:54:38Z)
• Interactive Natural Language Processing [67.87925315773924]
  Interactive Natural Language Processing (iNLP) has emerged as a novel paradigm within the field of NLP. This paper offers a comprehensive survey of iNLP, starting by proposing a unified definition and framework of the concept.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-22T17:18:29Z)
• Dissociating language and thought in large language models [52.39241645471213]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have come closest among all models to date to mastering human language. We ground this distinction in human neuroscience, which has shown that formal and functional competence rely on different neural mechanisms. Although LLMs are surprisingly good at formal competence, their performance on functional competence tasks remains spotty.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-16T22:41:19Z)
• Experience Grounds Language [185.73483760454454]
  Language understanding research is held back by a failure to relate language to the physical world it describes and to the social interactions it facilitates. Despite the incredible effectiveness of language processing models to tackle tasks after being trained on text alone, successful linguistic communication relies on a shared experience of the world.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-04-21T16:56:27Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.