Open LLMs are Necessary for Current Private Adaptations and Outperform their Closed Alternatives

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.05818v2
• Date: Fri, 15 Nov 2024 16:23:17 GMT
• Title: Open LLMs are Necessary for Current Private Adaptations and Outperform their Closed Alternatives
• Authors: Vincent Hanke, Tom Blanchard, Franziska Boenisch, Iyiola Emmanuel Olatunji, Michael Backes, Adam Dziedzic,
• Abstract summary: We analyze the privacy protection and performance of four most recent methods for private adaptation of closed LLMs. To achieve truly privacy-preserving LLM adaptations, taking into account current methods and models, one should use open LLMs.
• Score: 18.907157609731634
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: While open Large Language Models (LLMs) have made significant progress, they still fall short of matching the performance of their closed, proprietary counterparts, making the latter attractive even for the use on highly private data. Recently, various new methods have been proposed to adapt closed LLMs to private data without leaking private information to third parties and/or the LLM provider. In this work, we analyze the privacy protection and performance of the four most recent methods for private adaptation of closed LLMs. By examining their threat models and thoroughly comparing their performance under different privacy levels according to differential privacy (DP), various LLM architectures, and multiple datasets for classification and generation tasks, we find that: (1) all the methods leak query data, i.e., the (potentially sensitive) user data that is queried at inference time, to the LLM provider, (2) three out of four methods also leak large fractions of private training data to the LLM provider while the method that protects private data requires a local open LLM, (3) all the methods exhibit lower performance compared to three private gradient-based adaptation methods for local open LLMs, and (4) the private adaptation methods for closed LLMs incur higher monetary training and query costs than running the alternative methods on local open LLMs. This yields the conclusion that, to achieve truly privacy-preserving LLM adaptations that yield high performance and more privacy at lower costs, taking into account current methods and models, one should use open LLMs.

Related papers

• LLM-Lasso: A Robust Framework for Domain-Informed Feature Selection and Regularization [59.75242204923353]
  We introduce LLM-Lasso, a framework that leverages large language models (LLMs) to guide feature selection in Lasso regression. LLMs generate penalty factors for each feature, which are converted into weights for the Lasso penalty using a simple, tunable model. Features identified as more relevant by the LLM receive lower penalties, increasing their likelihood of being retained in the final model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-15T02:55:22Z)
• Differentially Private Steering for Large Language Model Alignment [55.30573701583768]
  We present the first study of aligning Large Language Models with private datasets. Our work proposes the Private Steering for LLM Alignment (PSA) algorithm to edit activations with differential privacy guarantees. Our results show that PSA achieves DP guarantees for LLM alignment with minimal loss in performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-30T17:58:36Z)
• Model-Based Privacy-Preserving Knowledge Transfer for Large Language Models [34.949731264918846]
  Llamdex is a framework that enhances large language models (LLMs) using only models trained on domain-specific data. Our approach significantly enhances the accuracy of domain-specific tasks, achieving up to a 26% accuracy improvement.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-14T13:18:20Z)
• LLM-PBE: Assessing Data Privacy in Large Language Models [111.58198436835036]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have become integral to numerous domains, significantly advancing applications in data management, mining, and analysis. Despite the critical nature of this issue, there has been no existing literature to offer a comprehensive assessment of data privacy risks in LLMs. Our paper introduces LLM-PBE, a toolkit crafted specifically for the systematic evaluation of data privacy risks in LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-23T01:37:29Z)
• Federated Domain-Specific Knowledge Transfer on Large Language Models Using Synthetic Data [53.70870879858533]
  We introduce a Federated Domain-specific Knowledge Transfer framework. It enables domain-specific knowledge transfer from LLMs to SLMs while preserving clients' data privacy. The proposed FDKT framework consistently and greatly improves SLMs' task performance by around 5% with a privacy budget of less than 10.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-23T06:14:35Z)
• LLM2LLM: Boosting LLMs with Novel Iterative Data Enhancement [79.31084387589968]
  Pretrained large language models (LLMs) are currently state-of-the-art for solving the vast majority of natural language processing tasks. We propose LLM2LLM, a data augmentation strategy that uses a teacher LLM to enhance a small seed dataset. We achieve improvements up to 24.2% on the GSM8K dataset, 32.6% on CaseHOLD, 32.0% on SNIPS, 52.6% on TREC and 39.8% on SST-2 over regular fine-tuning in the low-data regime.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-22T08:57:07Z)
• Small Models, Big Insights: Leveraging Slim Proxy Models To Decide When and What to Retrieve for LLMs [60.40396361115776]
  This paper introduces a novel collaborative approach, namely SlimPLM, that detects missing knowledge in large language models (LLMs) with a slim proxy model. We employ a proxy model which has far fewer parameters, and take its answers as answers. Heuristic answers are then utilized to predict the knowledge required to answer the user question, as well as the known and unknown knowledge within the LLM.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-19T11:11:08Z)
• Self-Play Fine-Tuning Converts Weak Language Models to Strong Language Models [52.98743860365194]
  We propose a new fine-tuning method called Self-Play fIne-tuNing (SPIN) At the heart of SPIN lies a self-play mechanism, where the LLM refines its capability by playing against instances of itself. This sheds light on the promise of self-play, enabling the achievement of human-level performance in LLMs without the need for expert opponents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-02T18:53:13Z)
• Differentially Private Low-Rank Adaptation of Large Language Model Using Federated Learning [32.52811740662061]
  This article introduces DP-LoRA, a novel federated learning algorithm tailored for large language models (LLMs) DP-LoRA preserves data privacy by employing a Gaussian mechanism that adds noise in weight updates, maintaining individual data privacy while facilitating collaborative model training.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-29T06:50:38Z)
• PrivLM-Bench: A Multi-level Privacy Evaluation Benchmark for Language Models [42.20437015301152]
  We present PrivLM-Bench, a benchmark for evaluating the privacy leakage of language models (LMs) Instead of only reporting DP parameters, PrivLM-Bench sheds light on the neglected inference data privacy during actual usage. We conduct extensive experiments on three datasets of GLUE for mainstream LMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-07T14:55:52Z)
• Last One Standing: A Comparative Analysis of Security and Privacy of Soft Prompt Tuning, LoRA, and In-Context Learning [25.454403998164203]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are powerful tools for natural language processing, enabling novel applications and user experiences. LLMs often require adaptation with private data, which poses privacy and security challenges. Several techniques have been proposed to adapt LLMs with private data, but their comparative privacy and security properties have not been systematically investigated.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-17T17:03:00Z)
• LLM-Pruner: On the Structural Pruning of Large Language Models [65.02607075556742]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown remarkable capabilities in language understanding and generation. We tackle the compression of LLMs within the bound of two constraints: being task-agnostic and minimizing the reliance on the original training dataset. Our method, named LLM-Pruner, adopts structural pruning that selectively removes non-critical coupled structures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-19T12:10:53Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.