An Empirical Analysis on Spatial Reasoning Capabilities of Large Multimodal Models

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.06048v1
• Date: Sat, 09 Nov 2024 03:07:33 GMT
• Title: An Empirical Analysis on Spatial Reasoning Capabilities of Large Multimodal Models
• Authors: Fatemeh Shiri, Xiao-Yu Guo, Mona Golestan Far, Xin Yu, Gholamreza Haffari, Yuan-Fang Li,
• Abstract summary: Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) have achieved strong performance across a range of vision and language tasks. However, their spatial reasoning capabilities are under-investigated. We construct a novel VQA dataset, Spatial-MM, to comprehensively study LMMs' spatial understanding and reasoning capabilities.
• Score: 56.537253374781876
• License:
• Abstract: Large Multimodal Models (LMMs) have achieved strong performance across a range of vision and language tasks. However, their spatial reasoning capabilities are under-investigated. In this paper, we construct a novel VQA dataset, Spatial-MM, to comprehensively study LMMs' spatial understanding and reasoning capabilities. Our analyses on object-relationship and multi-hop reasoning reveal several important findings. Firstly, bounding boxes and scene graphs, even synthetic ones, can significantly enhance LMMs' spatial reasoning. Secondly, LMMs struggle more with questions posed from the human perspective than the camera perspective about the image. Thirdly, chain of thought (CoT) prompting does not improve model performance on complex multi-hop questions involving spatial relations. % Moreover, spatial reasoning steps are much less accurate than non-spatial ones across MLLMs. Lastly, our perturbation analysis on GQA-spatial reveals that LMMs are much stronger at basic object detection than complex spatial reasoning. We believe our benchmark dataset and in-depth analyses can spark further research on LMMs spatial reasoning. Spatial-MM benchmark is available at: https://github.com/FatemehShiri/Spatial-MM

Related papers

• The Curse of Multi-Modalities: Evaluating Hallucinations of Large Multimodal Models across Language, Visual, and Audio [118.75449542080746]
  This paper presents the first systematic investigation of hallucinations in large multimodal models (LMMs) Our study reveals two key contributors to hallucinations: overreliance on unimodal priors and spurious inter-modality correlations. Our findings highlight key vulnerabilities, including imbalances in modality integration and biases from training data, underscoring the need for balanced cross-modal learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-16T17:59:02Z)
• LOKI: A Comprehensive Synthetic Data Detection Benchmark using Large Multimodal Models [55.903148392998965]
  We introduce LOKI, a novel benchmark designed to evaluate the ability of LMMs to detect synthetic data across multiple modalities. The benchmark includes coarse-grained judgment and multiple-choice questions, as well as fine-grained anomaly selection and explanation tasks. We evaluate 22 open-source LMMs and 6 closed-source models on LOKI, highlighting their potential as synthetic data detectors and also revealing some limitations in the development of LMM capabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-13T05:26:36Z)
• ReMI: A Dataset for Reasoning with Multiple Images [41.954830849939526]
  We introduce ReMI, a dataset designed to assess large language models' ability to Reason with Multiple Images. This dataset encompasses a diverse range of tasks, spanning various reasoning domains such as math, physics, logic, code, table/chart understanding, and spatial and temporal reasoning. We have benchmarked several cutting-edge LLMs and found a substantial gap between their performance and human-level proficiency.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T14:37:04Z)
• F-LMM: Grounding Frozen Large Multimodal Models [53.8059045627934]
  We present F-LMM -- grounding frozen off-the-shelf LMMs in human-AI conversations. Using only a few trainable CNN layers, we can translate word-pixel attention weights to mask logits. Our F-LMM neither learns special segmentation tokens nor utilises high-quality grounded instruction-tuning data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-09T15:14:26Z)
• SpaRC and SpaRP: Spatial Reasoning Characterization and Path Generation for Understanding Spatial Reasoning Capability of Large Language Models [70.01883340129204]
  spatial reasoning is a crucial component of both biological and artificial intelligence. We present a comprehensive study of the capability of current state-of-the-art large language models (LLMs) on spatial reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-07T01:06:34Z)
• Quantifying and Mitigating Unimodal Biases in Multimodal Large Language Models: A Causal Perspective [9.633811630889237]
  We propose a causal framework to interpret the biases in Visual Question Answering (VQA) problems. We introduce a novel dataset with 12,000 challenging VQA instances requiring multi-hop reasoning. Our experiments show that MLLMs perform poorly on MORE, indicating strong unimodal biases and limited semantic understanding.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-27T08:38:49Z)
• Benchmarking Large Language Models for Molecule Prediction Tasks [7.067145619709089]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) stand at the forefront of a number of Natural Language Processing (NLP) tasks. This paper explores a fundamental question: Can LLMs effectively handle molecule prediction tasks? We identify several classification and regression prediction tasks across six standard molecule datasets. We compare their performance with existing Machine Learning (ML) models, which include text-based models and those specifically designed for analysing the geometric structure of molecules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-08T05:59:56Z)
• Improving Large Language Models in Event Relation Logical Prediction [33.88499005859982]
  Event relation extraction is a challenging task that demands thorough semantic understanding and rigorous logical reasoning. In this paper, we conduct an in-depth investigation to systematically explore the capability of LLMs in understanding and applying event relation logic. Our study reveals that LLMs are not logically consistent reasoners, which results in their suboptimal performance on tasks that need rigorous reasoning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-13T14:53:06Z)
• Sentiment Analysis in the Era of Large Language Models: A Reality Check [69.97942065617664]
  This paper investigates the capabilities of large language models (LLMs) in performing various sentiment analysis tasks. We evaluate performance across 13 tasks on 26 datasets and compare the results against small language models (SLMs) trained on domain-specific datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-24T10:45:25Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.