Multimodal Clinical Reasoning through Knowledge-augmented Rationale Generation

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.07611v1
• Date: Tue, 12 Nov 2024 07:34:56 GMT
• Title: Multimodal Clinical Reasoning through Knowledge-augmented Rationale Generation
• Authors: Shuai Niu, Jing Ma, Liang Bai, Zhihua Wang, Yida Xu, Yunya Song, Xian Yang,
• Abstract summary: We introduce ClinRaGen, an SLM optimized for multimodal rationale generation in disease diagnosis. ClinRaGen incorporates a unique knowledge-augmented attention mechanism to merge domain knowledge with time series EHR data. Our evaluations show that ClinRaGen markedly improves the SLM's capability to interpret multimodal EHR data and generate accurate clinical rationales.
• Score: 12.242305026271675
• License:
• Abstract: Clinical rationales play a pivotal role in accurate disease diagnosis; however, many models predominantly use discriminative methods and overlook the importance of generating supportive rationales. Rationale distillation is a process that transfers knowledge from large language models (LLMs) to smaller language models (SLMs), thereby enhancing the latter's ability to break down complex tasks. Despite its benefits, rationale distillation alone is inadequate for addressing domain knowledge limitations in tasks requiring specialized expertise, such as disease diagnosis. Effectively embedding domain knowledge in SLMs poses a significant challenge. While current LLMs are primarily geared toward processing textual data, multimodal LLMs that incorporate time series data, especially electronic health records (EHRs), are still evolving. To tackle these limitations, we introduce ClinRaGen, an SLM optimized for multimodal rationale generation in disease diagnosis. ClinRaGen incorporates a unique knowledge-augmented attention mechanism to merge domain knowledge with time series EHR data, utilizing a stepwise rationale distillation strategy to produce both textual and time series-based clinical rationales. Our evaluations show that ClinRaGen markedly improves the SLM's capability to interpret multimodal EHR data and generate accurate clinical rationales, supporting more reliable disease diagnosis, advancing LLM applications in healthcare, and narrowing the performance divide between LLMs and SLMs.

Related papers

• Mitigating Hallucinations of Large Language Models in Medical Information Extraction via Contrastive Decoding [92.32881381717594]
  We introduce ALternate Contrastive Decoding (ALCD) to solve hallucination issues in medical information extraction tasks. ALCD demonstrates significant improvements in resolving hallucination issues compared to conventional decoding methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-21T07:19:19Z)
• Reasoning-Enhanced Healthcare Predictions with Knowledge Graph Community Retrieval [61.70489848327436]
  KARE is a novel framework that integrates knowledge graph (KG) community-level retrieval with large language models (LLMs) reasoning. Extensive experiments demonstrate that KARE outperforms leading models by up to 10.8-15.0% on MIMIC-III and 12.6-12.7% on MIMIC-IV for mortality and readmission predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-06T18:46:28Z)
• KARGEN: Knowledge-enhanced Automated Radiology Report Generation Using Large Language Models [39.831976458410864]
  This paper presents KARGEN, a Knowledge-enhanced Automated radiology Report GENeration framework based on Large Language Models. The framework integrates a knowledge graph to unlock chest disease-related knowledge within the LLM to enhance the clinical utility of generated reports. Our approach demonstrates promising results on the MIMIC-CXR and IU-Xray datasets.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-09T06:57:22Z)
• Assessing and Enhancing Large Language Models in Rare Disease Question-answering [64.32570472692187]
  We introduce a rare disease question-answering (ReDis-QA) dataset to evaluate the performance of Large Language Models (LLMs) in diagnosing rare diseases. We collected 1360 high-quality question-answer pairs within the ReDis-QA dataset, covering 205 rare diseases. We then benchmarked several open-source LLMs, revealing that diagnosing rare diseases remains a significant challenge for these models. Experiment results demonstrate that ReCOP can effectively improve the accuracy of LLMs on the ReDis-QA dataset by an average of 8%.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-15T21:09:09Z)
• MedTsLLM: Leveraging LLMs for Multimodal Medical Time Series Analysis [6.30440420617113]
  We introduce MedTsLLM, a general multimodal large language model (LLM) framework that integrates time series data and rich contextual information in the form of text to analyze physiological signals. We perform three tasks with clinical relevance: semantic segmentation, boundary detection, and anomaly detection in time series. Our model outperforms state-of-the-art baselines, including deep learning models, other LLMs, and clinical methods across multiple medical domains.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-14T18:57:05Z)
• CliBench: A Multifaceted and Multigranular Evaluation of Large Language Models for Clinical Decision Making [16.310913127940857]
  We introduce CliBench, a novel benchmark developed from the MIMIC IV dataset. This benchmark offers a comprehensive and realistic assessment of LLMs' capabilities in clinical diagnosis. We conduct a zero-shot evaluation of leading LLMs to assess their proficiency in clinical decision-making.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-14T11:10:17Z)
• XAI4LLM. Let Machine Learning Models and LLMs Collaborate for Enhanced In-Context Learning in Healthcare [16.79952669254101]
  We develop a novel method for zero-shot/few-shot in-context learning (ICL) using a multi-layered structured prompt. We also explore the efficacy of two communication styles between the user and Large Language Models (LLMs) Our study systematically evaluates the diagnostic accuracy and risk factors, including gender bias and false negative rates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T06:52:44Z)
• REALM: RAG-Driven Enhancement of Multimodal Electronic Health Records Analysis via Large Language Models [19.62552013839689]
  Existing models often lack the medical context relevent to clinical tasks, prompting the incorporation of external knowledge. We propose REALM, a Retrieval-Augmented Generation (RAG) driven framework to enhance multimodal EHR representations. Our experiments on MIMIC-III mortality and readmission tasks showcase the superior performance of our REALM framework over baselines.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-10T18:27:28Z)
• Large Language Model Distilling Medication Recommendation Model [61.89754499292561]
  We harness the powerful semantic comprehension and input-agnostic characteristics of Large Language Models (LLMs) Our research aims to transform existing medication recommendation methodologies using LLMs. To mitigate this, we have developed a feature-level knowledge distillation technique, which transfers the LLM's proficiency to a more compact model.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-05T08:25:22Z)
• Redefining Digital Health Interfaces with Large Language Models [69.02059202720073]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have emerged as general-purpose models with the ability to process complex information. We show how LLMs can provide a novel interface between clinicians and digital technologies. We develop a new prognostic tool using automated machine learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-05T14:18:40Z)
• Self-Verification Improves Few-Shot Clinical Information Extraction [73.6905567014859]
  Large language models (LLMs) have shown the potential to accelerate clinical curation via few-shot in-context learning. They still struggle with issues regarding accuracy and interpretability, especially in mission-critical domains such as health. Here, we explore a general mitigation framework using self-verification, which leverages the LLM to provide provenance for its own extraction and check its own outputs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-05-30T22:05:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.