R3HF: Reward Redistribution for Enhancing Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.08302v1
• Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2024 02:45:21 GMT
• Title: R3HF: Reward Redistribution for Enhancing Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback
• Authors: Jiahui Li, Tai-wei Chang, Fengda Zhang, Kun Kuang, Long Chen,
• Abstract summary: Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) provides a paradigm for aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences. This paper proposes a novel reward redistribution method called R3HF, which facilitates a more fine-grained, token-level reward allocation.
• Score: 25.27230140274847
• License:
• Abstract: Reinforcement learning from human feedback (RLHF) provides a paradigm for aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences. This involves the initial training of a reward model based on pairwise human feedback. The reward model is subsequently utilized in reinforcement learning to assess the scores of each generated sentence as a whole, further guiding the optimization of LLMs. However, current approaches have a significant shortcoming: \emph{They allocate a single, sparse, and delayed reward to an entire sequence of output}. This may overlook some significant individual contributions of each token towards the desired outcome. To overcome this limitation, our paper proposes a novel reward redistribution method called R3HF, which facilitates a more fine-grained, token-level reward allocation. Specifically, our method treats the reward prediction task of the reward model as a regression problem. As a result, the redistributed rewards are computed by evaluating the specific contribution of each token to the reward model's output. This detailed approach improves the model's understanding of language nuances, leading to more precise enhancements in its performance. Our method is crafted to integrate seamlessly with most current techniques while incurring minimal computational costs. Through comprehensive experiments across diverse datasets and tasks, we have verified the effectiveness and superiority of our approach.

Related papers

• Approximated Variational Bayesian Inverse Reinforcement Learning for Large Language Model Alignment [0.618727087412292]
  The alignment of large language models (LLMs) is crucial for generating helpful and harmless content. Existing approaches leverage preference-based human feedback data to learn the reward function. We propose a novel training objective, Approximated Variational Alignment (AVA), to perform LLM alignment through Approximated Variational Reward Learning (AVRIL)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-14T10:37:34Z)
• Optimal Design for Reward Modeling in RLHF [83.3614658277817]
  We formalize the reward training model in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback. We frame the selection of an effective dataset as a simple regret minimization task. We derive bounds on the simple regret under appropriate assumptions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-22T14:36:44Z)
• RewardBench: Evaluating Reward Models for Language Modeling [100.28366840977966]
  We present RewardBench, a benchmark dataset and code-base for evaluation of reward models. The dataset is a collection of prompt-chosen-rejected trios spanning chat, reasoning, and safety. On the RewardBench leaderboard, we evaluate reward models trained with a variety of methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-03-20T17:49:54Z)
• Dense Reward for Free in Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback [64.92448888346125]
  We leverage the fact that the reward model contains more information than just its scalar output. We use these attention weights to redistribute the reward along the whole completion. Empirically, we show that it stabilises training, accelerates the rate of learning, and, in practical cases, may lead to better local optima.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-01T17:10:35Z)
• Improving Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback with Efficient Reward Model Ensemble [67.4269821365504]
  Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) is a widely adopted approach for aligning large language models with human values. However, RLHF relies on a reward model that is trained with a limited amount of human preference data. We contribute a reward ensemble method that allows the reward model to make more accurate predictions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-30T00:17:37Z)
• Iterative Data Smoothing: Mitigating Reward Overfitting and Overoptimization in RLHF [79.98542868281471]
  Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) is a technique that aligns language models closely with human-centric values. It is observed that the performance of the reward model degrades after one epoch of training, and optimizing too much against the learned reward model eventually hinders the true objective. This paper delves into these issues, leveraging the theoretical insights to design improved reward learning algorithm termed 'Iterative Data Smoothing' (IDS)
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-29T17:43:42Z)
• Data Driven Reward Initialization for Preference based Reinforcement Learning [20.13307800821161]
  Preference-based Reinforcement Learning (PbRL) methods utilize binary feedback from the human in the loop (HiL) over queried trajectory pairs to learn a reward model. We investigate the issue of a high degree of variability in the reward models which are sensitive to random seeds of the experiment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-17T07:07:07Z)
• Reward Uncertainty for Exploration in Preference-based Reinforcement Learning [88.34958680436552]
  We present an exploration method specifically for preference-based reinforcement learning algorithms. Our main idea is to design an intrinsic reward by measuring the novelty based on learned reward. Our experiments show that exploration bonus from uncertainty in learned reward improves both feedback- and sample-efficiency of preference-based RL algorithms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-05-24T23:22:10Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.