BPO: Towards Balanced Preference Optimization between Knowledge Breadth and Depth in Alignment

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.10914v2
• Date: Thu, 20 Feb 2025 06:07:41 GMT
• Title: BPO: Towards Balanced Preference Optimization between Knowledge Breadth and Depth in Alignment
• Authors: Sizhe Wang, Yongqi Tong, Hengyuan Zhang, Dawei Li, Xin Zhang, Tianlong Chen,
• Abstract summary: We introduce the concepts of knowledge breadth and knowledge depth, which measure the comprehensiveness and depth of a knowledge source.<n>We propose Balanced Preference Optimization (BPO), designed to dynamically augment the knowledge depth of each sample.<n>BPO is motivated by the observation that the usefulness of knowledge varies across samples, necessitating tailored learning of knowledge depth.
• Score: 32.095601071459136
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: Reinforcement Learning with Human Feedback (RLHF) is the key to the success of large language models (LLMs) in recent years. In this work, we first introduce the concepts of knowledge breadth and knowledge depth, which measure the comprehensiveness and depth of an LLM or knowledge source respectively. We reveal that the imbalance in the number of prompts and responses can lead to a potential disparity in breadth and depth learning within alignment tuning datasets by showing that even a simple uniform method for balancing the number of instructions and responses can lead to significant improvements. Building on this, we further propose Balanced Preference Optimization (BPO), designed to dynamically augment the knowledge depth of each sample. BPO is motivated by the observation that the usefulness of knowledge varies across samples, necessitating tailored learning of knowledge depth. To achieve this, we introduce gradient-based clustering, estimating the knowledge informativeness and usefulness of each augmented sample based on the model's optimization direction. Our experimental results across various benchmarks demonstrate that BPO outperforms other baseline methods in alignment tuning while maintaining training efficiency. Furthermore, we conduct a detailed analysis of each component of BPO, providing guidelines for future research in preference data optimization.

Related papers

• Analytical Survey of Learning with Low-Resource Data: From Analysis to Investigation [192.53529928861818]
  Learning with high-resource data has demonstrated substantial success in artificial intelligence (AI)<n>However, the costs associated with data annotation and model training remain significant.<n>This survey employs active sampling theory to analyze the generalization error and label complexity associated with learning from low-resource data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-10-10T03:15:42Z)
• Development of Deep Learning Optimizers: Approaches, Concepts, and Update Rules [0.0]
  This study aims to provide a review of various gradients that have been proposed and received attention in the literature.<n>Momentum, AdamW, Sophia, and Muon are examined individually, and their distinctive features are highlighted.<n>Insights are offered into the open challenges encountered in the optimization of deep learning models.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-09-22T20:29:54Z)
• From Data-Centric to Sample-Centric: Enhancing LLM Reasoning via Progressive Optimization [7.531052649961168]
  Reinforcement learning with verifiable rewards (RLVR) has recently advanced the reasoning capabilities of large language models (LLMs)<n>We investigate RLVR from a sample-centric perspective and introduce LPPO, a framework of progressive optimization techniques.<n>Our work addresses a critical question: how to best leverage a small set of trusted, high-quality demonstrations, rather than simply scaling up data volume.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-09T06:05:28Z)
• The Hidden Link Between RLHF and Contrastive Learning [56.45346439723488]
  We show that Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) and the simple Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) can be interpreted from the perspective of mutual information (MI)<n>Within this framework, both RLHF and DPO can be interpreted as methods that performing contrastive learning based on the positive and negative samples derived from base model.<n>We propose the Mutual Information Optimization (MIO) to mitigate the late-stage decline in chosen-likelihood observed in DPO.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-27T18:51:25Z)
• Understanding the Impact of Sampling Quality in Direct Preference Optimization [4.122673728216191]
  We study how data of higher quality can be leveraged to improve performance in Direct Preference Optimization (DPO)<n>Our analyses show that both the solution space and the convergence behavior of DPO depend on the support and quality of the data-generating distribution.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-03T18:12:40Z)
• Differential Information Distribution: A Bayesian Perspective on Direct Preference Optimization [35.335072390336855]
  We study the goal of preference optimization as learning the differential information required to update a reference policy into a target policy.<n>First, we find that DPO's log-ratio reward is uniquely justified when preferences encode the Differential Information needed to update a reference policy into the target policy.<n>Second, we discuss how commonly observed training dynamics in DPO, including changes in log-likelihood and policy exploration, stem from a power-law DID relationship.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-05-29T17:59:50Z)
• A Survey of Direct Preference Optimization [103.59317151002693]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated unprecedented generative capabilities. Their alignment with human values remains critical for ensuring helpful and harmless deployments. Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) has recently gained prominence as a streamlined alternative.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-12T08:45:15Z)
• Active Learning for Direct Preference Optimization [59.84525302418018]
  Direct preference optimization (DPO) is a form of reinforcement learning from human feedback. We propose an active learning framework for DPO, which can be applied to collect human feedback online or to choose the most informative subset of already collected feedback offline.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-03T00:36:31Z)
• KBAlign: Efficient Self Adaptation on Specific Knowledge Bases [75.78948575957081]
  Large language models (LLMs) usually rely on retrieval-augmented generation to exploit knowledge materials in an instant manner. We propose KBAlign, an approach designed for efficient adaptation to downstream tasks involving knowledge bases. Our method utilizes iterative training with self-annotated data such as Q&A pairs and revision suggestions, enabling the model to grasp the knowledge content efficiently.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-22T08:21:03Z)
• TIS-DPO: Token-level Importance Sampling for Direct Preference Optimization With Estimated Weights [73.9088920210495]
  We propose a token-level importance sampling DPO objective named TIS-DPO that assigns importance weights to each token based on its reward. TIS-DPO significantly outperforms various baseline methods on harmlessness and helpfulness alignment and summarization tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-06T04:03:00Z)
• Self-supervised Preference Optimization: Enhance Your Language Model with Preference Degree Awareness [27.43137305486112]
  We propose a novel Self-supervised Preference Optimization (SPO) framework, which constructs a self-supervised preference degree loss combined with the alignment loss. The results demonstrate that SPO can be seamlessly integrated with existing preference optimization methods to achieve state-of-the-art performance.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-26T12:37:26Z)
• Knowledge Editing in Language Models via Adapted Direct Preference Optimization [50.616875565173274]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) can become outdated over time. Knowledge Editing aims to overcome this challenge using weight updates that do not require expensive retraining.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-14T11:02:21Z)
• Unpacking DPO and PPO: Disentangling Best Practices for Learning from Preference Feedback [110.16220825629749]
  Learning from preference feedback has emerged as an essential step for improving the generation quality and performance of modern language models. In this work, we identify four core aspects of preference-based learning: preference data, learning algorithm, reward model, and policy training prompts. Our findings indicate that all aspects are important for performance, with better preference data leading to the largest improvements.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-13T16:17:21Z)
• Monte Carlo Tree Search Boosts Reasoning via Iterative Preference Learning [55.96599486604344]
  We introduce an approach aimed at enhancing the reasoning capabilities of Large Language Models (LLMs) through an iterative preference learning process. We use Monte Carlo Tree Search (MCTS) to iteratively collect preference data, utilizing its look-ahead ability to break down instance-level rewards into more granular step-level signals. The proposed algorithm employs Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) to update the LLM policy using this newly generated step-level preference data.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-01T11:10:24Z)
• DPO Meets PPO: Reinforced Token Optimization for RLHF [36.97894955691627]
  We introduce a framework that models RLHF problems as a Markov decision process (MDP) Under this framework, we introduce an algorithm, dubbed as Reinforced Token Optimization (textttRTO), which learns the token-wise reward function from preference data. For its practical implementation, textttRTO innovatively integrates Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) and Proximal Policy Optimization.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-29T17:58:30Z)
• Advancing Deep Active Learning & Data Subset Selection: Unifying Principles with Information-Theory Intuitions [3.0539022029583953]
  This thesis aims to enhance the practicality of deep learning by improving the label and training efficiency of deep learning models. We investigate data subset selection techniques, specifically active learning and active sampling, grounded in information-theoretic principles.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-09T01:41:36Z)
• Learning Large-scale Neural Fields via Context Pruned Meta-Learning [60.93679437452872]
  We introduce an efficient optimization-based meta-learning technique for large-scale neural field training. We show how gradient re-scaling at meta-test time allows the learning of extremely high-quality neural fields. Our framework is model-agnostic, intuitive, straightforward to implement, and shows significant reconstruction improvements for a wide range of signals.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-01T17:32:16Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.