DPO Meets PPO: Reinforced Token Optimization for RLHF
- URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2404.18922v2
- Date: Sun, 21 Jul 2024 21:48:54 GMT
- Title: DPO Meets PPO: Reinforced Token Optimization for RLHF
- Authors: Han Zhong, Guhao Feng, Wei Xiong, Xinle Cheng, Li Zhao, Di He, Jiang Bian, Liwei Wang,
- Abstract summary: We introduce a framework that models RLHF problems as a Markov decision process (MDP)
Under this framework, we introduce an algorithm, dubbed as Reinforced Token Optimization (textttRTO), which learns the token-wise reward function from preference data.
For its practical implementation, textttRTO innovatively integrates Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) and Proximal Policy Optimization.
- Score: 36.97894955691627
- License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
- Abstract: In the classical Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) framework, Proximal Policy Optimization (PPO) is employed to learn from sparse, sentence-level rewards -- a challenging scenario in traditional deep reinforcement learning. Despite the great successes of PPO in the alignment of state-of-the-art closed-source large language models (LLMs), its open-source implementation is still largely sub-optimal, as widely reported by numerous research studies. To address these issues, we introduce a framework that models RLHF problems as a Markov decision process (MDP), enabling the capture of fine-grained token-wise information. Furthermore, we provide theoretical insights that demonstrate the superiority of our MDP framework over the previous sentence-level bandit formulation. Under this framework, we introduce an algorithm, dubbed as Reinforced Token Optimization (\texttt{RTO}), which learns the token-wise reward function from preference data and performs policy optimization based on this learned token-wise reward signal. Theoretically, \texttt{RTO} is proven to have the capability of finding the near-optimal policy sample-efficiently. For its practical implementation, \texttt{RTO} innovatively integrates Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) and PPO. DPO, originally derived from sparse sentence rewards, surprisingly provides us with a token-wise characterization of response quality, which is seamlessly incorporated into our subsequent PPO training stage. Extensive real-world alignment experiments verify the effectiveness of the proposed approach.
Related papers
- Accelerated Preference Optimization for Large Language Model Alignment [60.22606527763201]
Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) has emerged as a pivotal tool for aligning large language models (LLMs) with human preferences.
Direct Preference Optimization (DPO) formulates RLHF as a policy optimization problem without explicitly estimating the reward function.
We propose a general Accelerated Preference Optimization (APO) framework, which unifies many existing preference optimization algorithms.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-10-08T18:51:01Z) - Provably Mitigating Overoptimization in RLHF: Your SFT Loss is Implicitly an Adversarial Regularizer [52.09480867526656]
We identify the source of misalignment as a form of distributional shift and uncertainty in learning human preferences.
To mitigate overoptimization, we first propose a theoretical algorithm that chooses the best policy for an adversarially chosen reward model.
Using the equivalence between reward models and the corresponding optimal policy, the algorithm features a simple objective that combines a preference optimization loss and a supervised learning loss.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-05-26T05:38:50Z) - From $r$ to $Q^*$: Your Language Model is Secretly a Q-Function [50.812404038684505]
We show that we can derive DPO in the token-level MDP as a general inverse Q-learning algorithm, which satisfies the Bellman equation.
We discuss applications of our work, including information elicitation in multi-turn dialogue, reasoning, agentic applications and end-to-end training of multi-model systems.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-18T17:37:02Z) - Is DPO Superior to PPO for LLM Alignment? A Comprehensive Study [16.99550556866219]
Reinforcement Learning from Human Feedback (RLHF) is currently the most widely used method to align large language models (LLMs) with human preferences.
In academic benchmarks, state-of-the-art results are often achieved via reward-free methods, such as Direct Preference Optimization (DPO)
We show that PPO is able to surpass other alignment methods in all cases and achieve state-of-the-art results in challenging code competitions.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2024-04-16T16:51:53Z) - Preference as Reward, Maximum Preference Optimization with Importance Sampling [3.7040071165219595]
We propose a simple and intuitive off-policy preference optimization algorithm from an importance sampling view, which we call Maximum Preference Optimization (MPO)
MPO achieves the best of both worlds by combining the objectives of RLHF and IPO while being an off-policy algorithm.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-12-27T06:34:54Z) - Secrets of RLHF in Large Language Models Part I: PPO [81.01936993929127]
Large language models (LLMs) have formulated a blueprint for the advancement of artificial general intelligence.
reinforcement learning with human feedback (RLHF) emerges as the pivotal technological paradigm underpinning this pursuit.
In this report, we dissect the framework of RLHF, re-evaluate the inner workings of PPO, and explore how the parts comprising PPO algorithms impact policy agent training.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-07-11T01:55:24Z) - Fine-Tuning Language Models with Advantage-Induced Policy Alignment [80.96507425217472]
We propose a novel algorithm for aligning large language models to human preferences.
We show that it consistently outperforms PPO in language tasks by a large margin.
We also provide a theoretical justification supporting the design of our loss function.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-06-04T01:59:40Z) - Provable Reward-Agnostic Preference-Based Reinforcement Learning [61.39541986848391]
Preference-based Reinforcement Learning (PbRL) is a paradigm in which an RL agent learns to optimize a task using pair-wise preference-based feedback over trajectories.
We propose a theoretical reward-agnostic PbRL framework where exploratory trajectories that enable accurate learning of hidden reward functions are acquired.
arXiv Detail & Related papers (2023-05-29T15:00:09Z)
This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.
This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.