On algebraic analysis of Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff formula for Quantum Control and Quantum Speed Limit

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.13155v1
• Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 09:45:09 GMT
• Title: On algebraic analysis of Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff formula for Quantum Control and Quantum Speed Limit
• Authors: Go Kato, Masaki Owari, Koji Maruyama,
• Abstract summary: We show that a distance between unitaries can be introduced, allowing us to obtain a lower bound on the control time. We find that, as far as we can compare, this lower bound on control time is tighter (better) than the standard quantum speed limits.
• Score: 2.184775414778289
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: The necessary time required to control a many-body quantum system is a critically important issue for the future development of quantum technologies. However, it is generally quite difficult to analyze directly, since the time evolution operator acting on a quantum system is in the form of time-ordered exponential. In this work, we examine the Baker-Campbell-Hausdorff (BCH) formula in detail and show that a distance between unitaries can be introduced, allowing us to obtain a lower bound on the control time. We find that, as far as we can compare, this lower bound on control time is tighter (better) than the standard quantum speed limits. This is because this distance takes into account the algebraic structure induced by Hamiltonians through the BCH formula, reflecting the curved nature of operator space. Consequently, we can avoid estimates based on shortcuts through algebraically impossible paths, in contrast to geometric methods that estimate the control time solely by looking at the target state or unitary operator.

Related papers

• Identifying quantum coherence in quantum annealers [37.067444579637076]
  We use many-body coherent oscillations (MBCO) as a diagnostic for the identification of system-wide coherence in analog quantum simulators.<n>This work gives a general roadmap for the search for quantum coherence in noisy, large-scale quantum platforms.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2026-02-24T20:39:41Z)
• Topological control of quantum speed limits [55.2480439325792]
  We show that even if the quantum state is completely dispersionless, QFI in this state remains momentum-resolved.<n>We find bounds on quantum speed limit which scales as $sqrt|C|$ in a (dispersionless) topological phase.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-21T18:00:07Z)
• Quantum Speed Limits from Symmetries in Quantum Control [0.0]
  In quantum control, quantum speed limits provide fundamental lower bounds on the time that is needed to implement certain unitary transformations.<n>We link these speed limits to symmetries of the control Hamiltonians and provide quantitative bounds that can be calculated without solving the controlled system dynamics.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-11T18:00:02Z)
• Constant-Time Quantum Search with a Many-Body Quantum System [39.58317527488534]
  We consider a many-body quantum system that naturally effects parallel queries. We show that its parameters can be tuned to search a database in constant time.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-08-09T22:57:59Z)
• Exact and lower bounds for the quantum speed limit in finite dimensional systems [0.0]
  A fundamental problem in quantum engineering is determining the lowest time required to ensure that all possible unitaries can be generated. We use Lie algebra theory, Lie groups and differential geometry to formulate the problem in terms of geodesics on a differentiable manifold. We find a lower bound on the quantum speed limit in the common case where the system is described by a drift Hamiltonian and a single control Hamiltonian.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-04-13T15:37:39Z)
• The Impact of Imperfect Timekeeping on Quantum Control [0.24999074238880484]
  We study how limitations on acquiring knowledge of time impact controlled quantum operations. We show that the quality of timekeeping an agent has access to limits the circuit complexity they are able to achieve. We show that cooling a qubit can be achieved using a timer of arbitrary quality for control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-01-25T18:59:59Z)
• Quantum Speed Limit for Change of Basis [55.500409696028626]
  We extend the notion of quantum speed limits to collections of quantum states. For two-qubit systems, we show that the fastest transformation implements two Hadamards and a swap of the qubits simultaneously. For qutrit systems the evolution time depends on the particular type of the unbiased basis.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-12-23T14:10:13Z)
• Minimum-Time Quantum Control and the Quantum Brachistochrone Equation [3.0616044531734192]
  We present the general solution to the full quantum brachistochrone equation. We prove that the speed of evolution under constraints is reduced with respect to the unrestricted case. We find that solving the quantum brachistochrone equation is closely connected to solving the dynamics of the Lagrange multipliers.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-04-27T09:26:59Z)
• Quantum control landscape for ultrafast generation of single-qubit phase shift quantum gates [68.8204255655161]
  We consider the problem of ultrafast controlled generation of single-qubit phase shift quantum gates. Globally optimal control is a control which realizes the gate with maximal possible fidelity. Trap is a control which is optimal only locally but not globally.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-26T16:38:43Z)
• Information Scrambling in Computationally Complex Quantum Circuits [56.22772134614514]
  We experimentally investigate the dynamics of quantum scrambling on a 53-qubit quantum processor. We show that while operator spreading is captured by an efficient classical model, operator entanglement requires exponentially scaled computational resources to simulate.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-01-21T22:18:49Z)
• Time-optimal quantum transformations with bounded bandwidth [0.0]
  We derive sharp lower bounds, also known as quantum speed limits, for the time it takes to transform a quantum system into a state. In a final section, we use the quantum speed limits to obtain upper bounds on the power with which energy can be extracted from quantum batteries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-11-24T08:42:08Z)
• Boundaries of quantum supremacy via random circuit sampling [69.16452769334367]
  Google's recent quantum supremacy experiment heralded a transition point where quantum computing performed a computational task, random circuit sampling. We examine the constraints of the observed quantum runtime advantage in a larger number of qubits and gates.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-05-05T20:11:53Z)
• Analysis of lower bounds for quantum control times and their relation to the quantum speed limit [0.0]
  Limitations to the speed of evolution of quantum systems, typically referred to as quantum speed limits (QSLs), have important consequences for quantum control problems. In this paper we present a short introductory overview of quantum speed limit for unitary dynamics and its connection to quantum control.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2020-02-25T19:19:29Z)
• Projection evolution and quantum spacetime [68.8204255655161]
  We discuss the problem of time in quantum mechanics. An idea of construction of a quantum spacetime as a special set of the allowed states is presented. An example of a structureless quantum Minkowski-like spacetime is also considered.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2019-10-24T14:54:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.