Natural Language Reinforcement Learning

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.14251v3
• Date: Wed, 28 May 2025 00:04:45 GMT
• Title: Natural Language Reinforcement Learning
• Authors: Xidong Feng, Bo Liu, Yan Song, Haotian Fu, Ziyu Wan, Girish A. Koushik, Zhiyuan Hu, Mengyue Yang, Ying Wen, Jun Wang,
• Abstract summary: Natural Language Reinforcement Learning (NLRL) is a framework that extends RL principles into natural language counterparts.<n>Central to NLRL is the Language Value Function (LVF), which redefines value as an interpretable linguistic narrative.<n>NLRL can be practically implemented to achieve RL-like policy and value training through unsupervised environment interactions.
• Score: 27.816215336574803
• License: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/
• Abstract: Artificial intelligence progresses towards the "Era of Experience," where agents are expected to learn from continuous, grounded interaction. We argue that traditional Reinforcement Learning (RL), which typically represents value as a scalar, can restrict agent's deep understanding of environments and hinders the active, deliberative learning crucial for navigating this new paradigm. To address the issue, we introduce Natural Language Reinforcement Learning (NLRL), a framework that extends RL principles into natural language counterparts. Central to NLRL is the Language Value Function (LVF), which redefines value as an interpretable linguistic narrative articulating the rationale behind an evaluation. NLRL further extends this concept to core RL components, including policy, the Bellman equation, and policy iteration. Leveraging recent advancements in Large Language Models (LLMs), NLRL can be practically implemented to achieve RL-like policy and value training through unsupervised environment interactions. Experiments over 4 multi-step agentic tasks demonstrate NLRL's effectiveness, efficiency, and its potential to foster deeper understanding and more active learning strategies.

Related papers

• Inverse Reinforcement Learning Meets Large Language Model Post-Training: Basics, Advances, and Opportunities [62.05713042908654]
  This paper provides a review of advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) alignment through the lens of inverse reinforcement learning (IRL)<n>We highlight the necessity of constructing neural reward models from human data and discuss the formal and practical implications of this paradigm shift.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-17T14:22:24Z)
• Q-SFT: Q-Learning for Language Models via Supervised Fine-Tuning [62.984693936073974]
  Value-based reinforcement learning can learn effective policies for a wide range of multi-turn problems. Current value-based RL methods have proven particularly challenging to scale to the setting of large language models. We propose a novel offline RL algorithm that addresses these drawbacks, casting Q-learning as a modified supervised fine-tuning problem.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-07T21:36:52Z)
• Large Language Models are Interpretable Learners [53.56735770834617]
  In this paper, we show a combination of Large Language Models (LLMs) and symbolic programs can bridge the gap between expressiveness and interpretability. The pretrained LLM with natural language prompts provides a massive set of interpretable modules that can transform raw input into natural language concepts. As the knowledge learned by LSP is a combination of natural language descriptions and symbolic rules, it is easily transferable to humans (interpretable) and other LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-25T02:18:15Z)
• How Can LLM Guide RL? A Value-Based Approach [68.55316627400683]
  Reinforcement learning (RL) has become the de facto standard practice for sequential decision-making problems by improving future acting policies with feedback. Recent developments in large language models (LLMs) have showcased impressive capabilities in language understanding and generation, yet they fall short in exploration and self-improvement capabilities. We develop an algorithm named LINVIT that incorporates LLM guidance as a regularization factor in value-based RL, leading to significant reductions in the amount of data needed for learning.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-25T20:07:13Z)
• Natural Language Reinforcement Learning [25.165291680493844]
  We introduce Natural Language Reinforcement Learning (NLRL), which combines RL principles with natural language representation. Specifically, NLRL redefines RL concepts like task objectives, policy, value function, Bellman equation, and policy iteration in natural language space.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-11T11:03:04Z)
• The RL/LLM Taxonomy Tree: Reviewing Synergies Between Reinforcement Learning and Large Language Models [2.5721733711031978]
  We review research studies that combine Reinforcement Learning (RL) and Large Language Models (LLMs) We propose a novel taxonomy of three main classes based on the way that the two model types interact with each other.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-02T20:01:15Z)
• GLIDE-RL: Grounded Language Instruction through DEmonstration in RL [7.658523833511356]
  Training efficient Reinforcement Learning (RL) agents grounded in natural language has been a long-standing challenge. We present a novel algorithm, Grounded Language Instruction through DEmonstration in RL (GLIDE-RL) that introduces a teacher-instructor-student curriculum learning framework. In this multi-agent framework, the teacher and the student agents learn simultaneously based on the student's current skill level.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-03T17:32:13Z)
• LMRL Gym: Benchmarks for Multi-Turn Reinforcement Learning with Language Models [56.25156596019168]
  This paper introduces the LMRL-Gym benchmark for evaluating multi-turn RL for large language models (LLMs) Our benchmark consists of 8 different language tasks, which require multiple rounds of language interaction and cover a range of tasks in open-ended dialogue and text games.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-11-30T03:59:31Z)
• Natural Language-conditioned Reinforcement Learning with Inside-out Task Language Development and Translation [14.176720914723127]
  Natural Language-conditioned reinforcement learning (RL) enables the agents to follow human instructions. Previous approaches generally implemented language-conditioned RL by providing human instructions in natural language (NL) and training a following policy. We develop an inside-out scheme for natural language-conditioned RL by developing a task language (TL) that is task-related and unique.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-18T15:49:09Z)
• Flexible Attention-Based Multi-Policy Fusion for Efficient Deep Reinforcement Learning [78.31888150539258]
  Reinforcement learning (RL) agents have long sought to approach the efficiency of human learning. Prior studies in RL have incorporated external knowledge policies to help agents improve sample efficiency. We present Knowledge-Grounded RL (KGRL), an RL paradigm fusing multiple knowledge policies and aiming for human-like efficiency and flexibility.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-07T17:56:57Z)
• Is Reinforcement Learning (Not) for Natural Language Processing?: Benchmarks, Baselines, and Building Blocks for Natural Language Policy Optimization [73.74371798168642]
  We introduce an open-source modular library, RL4LMs, for optimizing language generators with reinforcement learning. Next, we present the GRUE benchmark, a set of 6 language generation tasks which are supervised not by target strings, but by reward functions. Finally, we introduce an easy-to-use, performant RL algorithm, NLPO, that learns to effectively reduce the action space in language generation.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-10-03T21:38:29Z)
• Offline RL for Natural Language Generation with Implicit Language Q Learning [87.76695816348027]
  Large language models can be inconsistent when it comes to completing user specified tasks. We propose a novel RL method, that combines both the flexible utility framework of RL with the ability of supervised learning. In addition to empirically validating ILQL, we present a detailed empirical analysis situations where offline RL can be useful in natural language generation settings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-06-05T18:38:42Z)
• Overlap-based Vocabulary Generation Improves Cross-lingual Transfer Among Related Languages [18.862296065737347]
  We argue that relatedness among languages in a language family along the dimension of lexical overlap may be leveraged to overcome some of the corpora limitations of LRLs. We propose Overlap BPE, a simple yet effective modification to the BPE vocabulary generation algorithm which enhances overlap across related languages.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2022-03-03T19:35:24Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.