Knowledge Graphs, Large Language Models, and Hallucinations: An NLP Perspective

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.14258v1
• Date: Thu, 21 Nov 2024 16:09:05 GMT
• Title: Knowledge Graphs, Large Language Models, and Hallucinations: An NLP Perspective
• Authors: Ernests Lavrinovics, Russa Biswas, Johannes Bjerva, Katja Hose,
• Abstract summary: Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized Natural Language Processing (NLP) based applications including automated text generation, question answering, and others. They face a significant challenge: hallucinations, where models produce plausible-sounding but factually incorrect responses. This paper discusses these open challenges covering state-of-the-art datasets and benchmarks as well as methods for knowledge integration and evaluating hallucinations.
• Score: 5.769786334333616
• License:
• Abstract: Large Language Models (LLMs) have revolutionized Natural Language Processing (NLP) based applications including automated text generation, question answering, chatbots, and others. However, they face a significant challenge: hallucinations, where models produce plausible-sounding but factually incorrect responses. This undermines trust and limits the applicability of LLMs in different domains. Knowledge Graphs (KGs), on the other hand, provide a structured collection of interconnected facts represented as entities (nodes) and their relationships (edges). In recent research, KGs have been leveraged to provide context that can fill gaps in an LLM understanding of certain topics offering a promising approach to mitigate hallucinations in LLMs, enhancing their reliability and accuracy while benefiting from their wide applicability. Nonetheless, it is still a very active area of research with various unresolved open problems. In this paper, we discuss these open challenges covering state-of-the-art datasets and benchmarks as well as methods for knowledge integration and evaluating hallucinations. In our discussion, we consider the current use of KGs in LLM systems and identify future directions within each of these challenges.

Related papers

• Ontology Population using LLMs [0.9894420655516563]
  Knowledge graphs (KGs) are increasingly utilized for data integration, representation, and visualization. LLMs offer promising capabilities for such tasks, excelling in natural language understanding and content generation. This study investigates LLM effectiveness for the KG population, focusing on the Enslaved.org Hub Ontology.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-03T15:39:20Z)
• Combining Knowledge Graphs and Large Language Models [4.991122366385628]
  Large language models (LLMs) show astonishing results in language understanding and generation. They still show some disadvantages, such as hallucinations and lack of domain-specific knowledge. These issues can be effectively mitigated by incorporating knowledge graphs (KGs) This work collected 28 papers outlining methods for KG-powered LLMs, LLM-based KGs, and LLM-KG hybrid approaches.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-07-09T05:42:53Z)
• Knowledge Graph-Enhanced Large Language Models via Path Selection [58.228392005755026]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have shown unprecedented performance in various real-world applications. LLMs are known to generate factually inaccurate outputs, a.k.a. the hallucination problem. We propose a principled framework KELP with three stages to handle the above problems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-19T21:45:20Z)
• Prompting Large Language Models with Knowledge Graphs for Question Answering Involving Long-tail Facts [50.06633829833144]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) are effective in performing various NLP tasks, but struggle to handle tasks that require extensive, real-world knowledge. We propose a benchmark that requires knowledge of long-tail facts for answering the involved questions. Our experiments show that LLMs alone struggle with answering these questions, especially when the long-tail level is high or rich knowledge is required.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-10T15:10:20Z)
• LLMs' Reading Comprehension Is Affected by Parametric Knowledge and Struggles with Hypothetical Statements [59.71218039095155]
  Task of reading comprehension (RC) provides a primary means to assess language models' natural language understanding (NLU) capabilities. If the context aligns with the models' internal knowledge, it is hard to discern whether the models' answers stem from context comprehension or from internal information. To address this issue, we suggest to use RC on imaginary data, based on fictitious facts and entities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-09T13:08:56Z)
• Rethinking Interpretability in the Era of Large Language Models [76.1947554386879]
  Large language models (LLMs) have demonstrated remarkable capabilities across a wide array of tasks. The capability to explain in natural language allows LLMs to expand the scale and complexity of patterns that can be given to a human. These new capabilities raise new challenges, such as hallucinated explanations and immense computational costs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-30T17:38:54Z)
• Context Matters: Pushing the Boundaries of Open-Ended Answer Generation with Graph-Structured Knowledge Context [4.1229332722825]
  This paper introduces a novel framework that combines graph-driven context retrieval in conjunction to knowledge graphs based enhancement. We conduct experiments on various Large Language Models (LLMs) with different parameter sizes to evaluate their ability to ground knowledge and determine factual accuracy in answers to open-ended questions. Our methodology GraphContextGen consistently outperforms dominant text-based retrieval systems, demonstrating its robustness and adaptability to a larger number of use cases.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-23T11:25:34Z)
• A Comprehensive Survey of Hallucination Mitigation Techniques in Large Language Models [7.705767540805267]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) continue to advance in their ability to write human-like text. A key challenge remains around their tendency to hallucinate generating content that appears factual but is ungrounded. This paper presents a survey of over 32 techniques developed to mitigate hallucination in LLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-02T17:56:30Z)
• DIVKNOWQA: Assessing the Reasoning Ability of LLMs via Open-Domain Question Answering over Knowledge Base and Text [73.68051228972024]
  Large Language Models (LLMs) have exhibited impressive generation capabilities, but they suffer from hallucinations when relying on their internal knowledge. Retrieval-augmented LLMs have emerged as a potential solution to ground LLMs in external knowledge.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-31T04:37:57Z)
• Check Your Facts and Try Again: Improving Large Language Models with External Knowledge and Automated Feedback [127.75419038610455]
  Large language models (LLMs) are able to generate human-like, fluent responses for many downstream tasks. This paper proposes a LLM-Augmenter system, which augments a black-box LLM with a set of plug-and-play modules.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-02-24T18:48:43Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.