Beyond Visual Understanding: Introducing PARROT-360V for Vision Language Model Benchmarking

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.15201v1
• Date: Wed, 20 Nov 2024 01:09:21 GMT
• Title: Beyond Visual Understanding: Introducing PARROT-360V for Vision Language Model Benchmarking
• Authors: Harsha Vardhan Khurdula, Basem Rizk, Indus Khaitan, Janit Anjaria, Aviral Srivastava, Rajvardhan Khaitan,
• Abstract summary: We introduce the PARROT-360V Benchmark, a novel and comprehensive benchmark featuring 2487 challenging visual puzzles. We evaluate leading models: GPT-4o, Claude-3.5-Sonnet, and Gemini-1.5-Pro. State-of-the-art models scored between 28 to 56 percentage on our benchmark, significantly lower than their performance on popular benchmarks.
• Score: 0.12369742273401668
• License:
• Abstract: Current benchmarks for evaluating Vision Language Models (VLMs) often fall short in thoroughly assessing model abilities to understand and process complex visual and textual content. They typically focus on simple tasks that do not require deep reasoning or the integration of multiple data modalities to solve an original problem. To address this gap, we introduce the PARROT-360V Benchmark, a novel and comprehensive benchmark featuring 2487 challenging visual puzzles designed to test VLMs on complex visual reasoning tasks. We evaluated leading models: GPT-4o, Claude-3.5-Sonnet, and Gemini-1.5-Pro, using PARROT-360V to assess their capabilities in combining visual clues with language skills to solve tasks in a manner akin to human problem-solving. Our findings reveal a notable performance gap: state-of-the-art models scored between 28 to 56 percentage on our benchmark, significantly lower than their performance on popular benchmarks. This underscores the limitations of current VLMs in handling complex, multi-step reasoning tasks and highlights the need for more robust evaluation frameworks to advance the field.

Related papers

• VLM$^2$-Bench: A Closer Look at How Well VLMs Implicitly Link Explicit Matching Visual Cues [32.00120712945976]
  VLM$2$-Bench is a benchmark designed to assess whether vision-language models can Visually Link Matching cues. We identify critical challenges in models' ability to link visual cues, highlighting a significant performance gap where even GPT-4o lags 34.80% behind humans.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-17T17:57:50Z)
• iVISPAR -- An Interactive Visual-Spatial Reasoning Benchmark for VLMs [4.381263829108405]
  Vision-Language Models (VLMs) are known to struggle with spatial reasoning and visual alignment. We introduce iVISPAR, an interactive multi-modal benchmark designed to evaluate the spatial reasoning capabilities of VLMs acting as agents.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-05T14:29:01Z)
• LlamaV-o1: Rethinking Step-by-step Visual Reasoning in LLMs [103.0226977561914]
  We propose a comprehensive framework for advancing step-by-step visual reasoning in large language models. We introduce a visual reasoning benchmark specifically designed to evaluate multi-step reasoning tasks. Second, we propose a novel metric that assesses visual reasoning quality at the granularity of individual steps. Third, we present a new multimodal visual reasoning model, named LlamaV-o1, trained using a multi-step curriculum learning approach.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-01-10T18:59:51Z)
• Insight Over Sight? Exploring the Vision-Knowledge Conflicts in Multimodal LLMs [55.74117540987519]
  This paper explores the problem of commonsense-level vision-knowledge conflict in Multimodal Large Language Models (MLLMs) We introduce an automated pipeline, augmented with human-in-the-loop quality control, to establish a benchmark aimed at simulating and assessing the conflicts in MLLMs. We evaluate the conflict-resolution capabilities of nine representative MLLMs across various model families and find a noticeable over-reliance on textual queries.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-10T17:31:17Z)
• VHELM: A Holistic Evaluation of Vision Language Models [75.88987277686914]
  We present the Holistic Evaluation of Vision Language Models (VHELM) VHELM aggregates various datasets to cover one or more of the 9 aspects: visual perception, knowledge, reasoning, bias, fairness, multilinguality, robustness, toxicity, and safety. Our framework is designed to be lightweight and automatic so that evaluation runs are cheap and fast.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-10-09T17:46:34Z)
• Reasoning Paths with Reference Objects Elicit Quantitative Spatial Reasoning in Large Vision-Language Models [61.899791071654654]
  We introduce a benchmark, Q-Spatial Bench, with 271 questions across five categories designed for quantitative spatial reasoning. We investigate the performance of state-of-the-art vision-language models (VLMs) on this task. We develop a zero-shot prompting technique, SpatialPrompt, that encourages VLMs to answer quantitative spatial questions using reference objects as visual cues.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-15T16:45:42Z)
• Benchmarking Multi-Image Understanding in Vision and Language Models: Perception, Knowledge, Reasoning, and Multi-Hop Reasoning [15.296263261737026]
  We introduce a Multi-Image MIRB Benchmark to evaluate visual language models' ability to compare, analyze, and reason across multiple images. Our benchmark encompasses four categories: perception, visual world knowledge, reasoning, and multi-hop reasoning. We demonstrate that while open-source VLMs were shown to approach the GPT-4V in single-image tasks, a significant gap remains in multi-image reasoning tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-06-18T16:02:18Z)
• MARVEL: Multidimensional Abstraction and Reasoning through Visual Evaluation and Learning [22.440669015518015]
  We evaluate whether multi-modal large language models (MLLMs) possess abstract visual reasoning abilities. Similar to the Sudoku puzzles, abstract visual reasoning (AVR) problems require finding high-level patterns. We introduce MARVEL, a benchmark with 770 MLLMs composed of six core knowledge patterns, geometric and abstract shapes, and five different task configurations.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-04-21T09:15:02Z)
• Prismatic VLMs: Investigating the Design Space of Visually-Conditioned Language Models [73.40350756742231]
  Visually-conditioned language models (VLMs) have seen growing adoption in applications such as visual dialogue, scene understanding, and robotic task planning. Despite the volume of new releases, key design decisions around image preprocessing, architecture, and optimization are under-explored.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-02-12T18:21:14Z)
• Behind the Magic, MERLIM: Multi-modal Evaluation Benchmark for Large Image-Language Models [50.653838482083614]
  This paper introduces a scalable test-bed to assess the capabilities of IT-LVLMs on fundamental computer vision tasks. MERLIM contains over 300K image-question pairs and has a strong focus on detecting cross-modal "hallucination" events in IT-LVLMs.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-03T16:39:36Z)
• Lost in Translation: When GPT-4V(ision) Can't See Eye to Eye with Text. A Vision-Language-Consistency Analysis of VLLMs and Beyond [7.760124498553333]
  We study whether vision-language models execute vision and language tasks consistently or independently. We introduce a systematic framework that quantifies the capability disparities between different modalities in the multi-modal setting. We introduce "Vision Description Prompting," a method that effectively improves performance in challenging vision-related tasks.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-10-19T06:45:11Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.