Poster: From Fort to Foe: The Threat of RCE in RPKI

• URL: http://arxiv.org/abs/2411.16518v1
• Date: Mon, 25 Nov 2024 16:01:02 GMT
• Title: Poster: From Fort to Foe: The Threat of RCE in RPKI
• Authors: Oliver Jacobsen, Haya Schulmann, Niklas Vogel, Michael Waidner,
• Abstract summary: We present a novel severe buffer-overflow vulnerability in the RPKI validator Fort. This vulnerability allows an attacker to achieve Remote Code Execution on the machine running the software.
• Score: 16.84312626844573
• License: http://arxiv.org/licenses/nonexclusive-distrib/1.0/
• Abstract: In this work, we present a novel severe buffer-overflow vulnerability in the RPKI validator Fort, that allows an attacker to achieve Remote Code Execution (RCE) on the machine running the software. We discuss the unique impact of this RCE on networks that use RPKI, illustrating that RCE vulnerabilities are especially severe in the context of RPKI. The design of RPKI makes RCE easy to exploit on a large scale, allows compromise of RPKI validation integrity, and enables a powerful vector for additional attacks on other critical components of the network, like the border routers. We analyze the vulnerability exposing to this RCE and identify indications that the discovered vulnerability could constitute an intentional backdoor to compromise systems running the software over a benign coding mistake. We disclosed the vulnerability, which has been assigned a CVE rated 9.8 critical (CVE-2024-45237).

Related papers

• Pruning the Tree: Rethinking RPKI Architecture From The Ground Up [2.340368527699536]
  Resource Public Key Infrastructure (RPKI) is a critical security mechanism for BGP.<n>RPKI design heavily reuses legacy PKI components, such as X.509 EE-certificates, ASN.1 encoding, and XML-based repository protocols.<n>We show that these design choices, although based on established standards, create significant performance bottlenecks, increase the vulnerability surface, and hinder scalability for wide-scale Internet deployment.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-07-02T08:24:50Z)
• CyberGym: Evaluating AI Agents' Cybersecurity Capabilities with Real-World Vulnerabilities at Scale [46.76144797837242]
  Large language model (LLM) agents are becoming increasingly skilled at handling cybersecurity tasks autonomously.<n>Existing benchmarks fall short, often failing to capture real-world scenarios or being limited in scope.<n>We introduce CyberGym, a large-scale and high-quality cybersecurity evaluation framework featuring 1,507 real-world vulnerabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-06-03T07:35:14Z)
• Fooling the Decoder: An Adversarial Attack on Quantum Error Correction [49.48516314472825]
  In this work, we target a basic RL surface code decoder (DeepQ) to create the first adversarial attack on quantum error correction. We demonstrate an attack that reduces the logical qubit lifetime in memory experiments by up to five orders of magnitude. This attack highlights the susceptibility of machine learning-based QEC and underscores the importance of further research into robust QEC methods.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-04-28T10:10:05Z)
• CVE-Bench: A Benchmark for AI Agents' Ability to Exploit Real-World Web Application Vulnerabilities [6.752938800468733]
  Large language model (LLM) agents are increasingly capable of autonomously conducting cyberattacks. Existing benchmarks fall short as they are limited to abstracted Capture the Flag competitions or lack comprehensive coverage. We introduce CVE-Bench, a real-world cybersecurity benchmark based on critical-severity Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-03-21T17:32:32Z)
• To Think or Not to Think: Exploring the Unthinking Vulnerability in Large Reasoning Models [56.19026073319406]
  Large Reasoning Models (LRMs) are designed to solve complex tasks by generating explicit reasoning traces before producing final answers.<n>We reveal a critical vulnerability in LRMs -- termed Unthinking -- wherein the thinking process can be bypassed by manipulating special tokens.<n>In this paper, we investigate this vulnerability from both malicious and beneficial perspectives.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2025-02-16T10:45:56Z)
• In-Context Experience Replay Facilitates Safety Red-Teaming of Text-to-Image Diffusion Models [97.82118821263825]
  Text-to-image (T2I) models have shown remarkable progress, but their potential to generate harmful content remains a critical concern in the ML community. We propose ICER, a novel red-teaming framework that generates interpretable and semantic meaningful problematic prompts. Our work provides crucial insights for developing more robust safety mechanisms in T2I systems.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-25T04:17:24Z)
• RedCode: Risky Code Execution and Generation Benchmark for Code Agents [50.81206098588923]
  RedCode is a benchmark for risky code execution and generation. RedCode-Exec provides challenging prompts that could lead to risky code execution. RedCode-Gen provides 160 prompts with function signatures and docstrings as input to assess whether code agents will follow instructions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-11-12T13:30:06Z)
• The Impact of SBOM Generators on Vulnerability Assessment in Python: A Comparison and a Novel Approach [56.4040698609393]
  Software Bill of Materials (SBOM) has been promoted as a tool to increase transparency and verifiability in software composition. Current SBOM generation tools often suffer from inaccuracies in identifying components and dependencies. We propose PIP-sbom, a novel pip-inspired solution that addresses their shortcomings.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-09-10T10:12:37Z)
• Securing the Open RAN Infrastructure: Exploring Vulnerabilities in Kubernetes Deployments [60.51751612363882]
  We investigate the security implications of and software-based Open Radio Access Network (RAN) systems. We highlight the presence of potential vulnerabilities and misconfigurations in the infrastructure supporting the Near Real-Time RAN Controller (RIC) cluster.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-05-03T07:18:45Z)
• The Vulnerability Is in the Details: Locating Fine-grained Information of Vulnerable Code Identified by Graph-based Detectors [33.395068754566935]
  VULEXPLAINER is a tool for locating vulnerability-critical code lines from coarse-level vulnerable code snippets. It can flag the vulnerability-triggering code statements with an accuracy of around 90% against eight common C/C++ vulnerabilities.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2024-01-05T10:15:04Z)
• CVE representation to build attack positions graphs [0.39945675027960637]
  In cybersecurity, CVEs (Common Vulnerabilities and Exposures) are publicly disclosed hardware or software vulnerabilities. This article points out that these vulnerabilities should be described in greater detail to understand how they could be chained together in a complete attack scenario.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-05T08:57:14Z)
• The CURE To Vulnerabilities in RPKI Validation [19.36803276657266]
  RPKI has seen increasing adoption, with now 37.8% of the major networks filtering bogus BGP routes. We report a total of 18 vulnerabilities that can be exploited to downgrade RPKI validation in border routers. We generate over 600 million test cases and tested all popular RPs on them.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-12-04T13:09:37Z)
• Execution at RISC: Stealth JOP Attacks on RISC-V Applications [0.5543867614999909]
  This paper demonstrates that RISC-V is sensible to Jump-Oriented Programming, a class of complex code-reuse attacks. A proof-of-concept attack is implemented on an embedded web server compiled for RISC-V.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2023-07-24T09:39:21Z)
• Safe RAN control: A Symbolic Reinforcement Learning Approach [62.997667081978825]
  We present a Symbolic Reinforcement Learning (SRL) based architecture for safety control of Radio Access Network (RAN) applications. We provide a purely automated procedure in which a user can specify high-level logical safety specifications for a given cellular network topology. We introduce a user interface (UI) developed to help a user set intent specifications to the system, and inspect the difference in agent proposed actions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-06-03T16:45:40Z)
• Multi-context Attention Fusion Neural Network for Software Vulnerability Identification [4.05739885420409]
  We propose a deep learning model that learns to detect some of the common categories of security vulnerabilities in source code efficiently. The model builds an accurate understanding of code semantics with a lot less learnable parameters. The proposed AI achieves 98.40% F1-score on specific CWEs from the benchmarked NIST SARD dataset.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-04-19T11:50:36Z)
• Symbolic Reinforcement Learning for Safe RAN Control [62.997667081978825]
  We show a Symbolic Reinforcement Learning (SRL) architecture for safe control in Radio Access Network (RAN) applications. In our tool, a user can select a high-level safety specifications expressed in Linear Temporal Logic (LTL) to shield an RL agent running in a given cellular network. We demonstrate the user interface (UI) helping the user set intent specifications to the architecture and inspect the difference in allowed and blocked actions.
  arXiv  Detail & Related papers  (2021-03-11T10:56:49Z)

This list is automatically generated from the titles and abstracts of the papers in this site.

This site does not guarantee the quality of this site (including all information) and is not responsible for any consequences.